Cargando…
The contribution of tipping fees to the operation, maintenance, and management of fecal sludge treatment plants: The case of Ghana
Globally, collection of tipping fees is being promoted as a solution to sustain the operation of fecal sludge treatment plants (FSTPs). Currently, there are six large-scale FSTPs in Ghana, of which five were in operation in June 2017. In Kumasi, Sekondi-Takoradi and Tamale, fecal sludge (FS) is co-t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academic Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8759011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34844055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114125 |
_version_ | 1784633024616333312 |
---|---|
author | Tanoh, Rebecca Nikiema, Josiane Asiedu, Zipporah Jayathilake, Nilanthi Cofie, Olufunke |
author_facet | Tanoh, Rebecca Nikiema, Josiane Asiedu, Zipporah Jayathilake, Nilanthi Cofie, Olufunke |
author_sort | Tanoh, Rebecca |
collection | PubMed |
description | Globally, collection of tipping fees is being promoted as a solution to sustain the operation of fecal sludge treatment plants (FSTPs). Currently, there are six large-scale FSTPs in Ghana, of which five were in operation in June 2017. In Kumasi, Sekondi-Takoradi and Tamale, fecal sludge (FS) is co-treated with landfill leachate using waste stabilization ponds (WSPs). In Tema and Accra, FS is treated using WSPs and a mechanical dewatering system coupled with an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB). The focus of this study is FSTPs and to assess how, and if, the tipping fees set by the municipalities could enable cost recovery to sustain their long-term operation. Using a questionnaire survey to interview plant managers from the public and private sectors, and directors of waste management departments, we found that the overall average operation, maintenance and management (OM&M) costs per 1000 m(3) of treated waste (FS or FS + leachate) in 2017 were USD89 in Kumasi, USD150 in Tamale, USD179 in Tema, USD244 in Sekondi-Takoradi and USD1,743 in Accra. There were important disparities between FSTPs due to their scale, age, and level of treatment and monitoring. Currently, most FSTPs charge tipping fees that range between USD310 and USD530/1000 m(3) of FS, averaging USD421 ± 98/1000 m(3) of FS discharged at FSTPs. Our study also showed that the OM&M costs of large-scale intensive FSTPs cannot be sustained by relying solely on tipping fees. However, there could be potential to cover the routine expenditures associated with operating smaller FSTPs that relying on WSP technologies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8759011 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Academic Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87590112022-02-01 The contribution of tipping fees to the operation, maintenance, and management of fecal sludge treatment plants: The case of Ghana Tanoh, Rebecca Nikiema, Josiane Asiedu, Zipporah Jayathilake, Nilanthi Cofie, Olufunke J Environ Manage Article Globally, collection of tipping fees is being promoted as a solution to sustain the operation of fecal sludge treatment plants (FSTPs). Currently, there are six large-scale FSTPs in Ghana, of which five were in operation in June 2017. In Kumasi, Sekondi-Takoradi and Tamale, fecal sludge (FS) is co-treated with landfill leachate using waste stabilization ponds (WSPs). In Tema and Accra, FS is treated using WSPs and a mechanical dewatering system coupled with an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB). The focus of this study is FSTPs and to assess how, and if, the tipping fees set by the municipalities could enable cost recovery to sustain their long-term operation. Using a questionnaire survey to interview plant managers from the public and private sectors, and directors of waste management departments, we found that the overall average operation, maintenance and management (OM&M) costs per 1000 m(3) of treated waste (FS or FS + leachate) in 2017 were USD89 in Kumasi, USD150 in Tamale, USD179 in Tema, USD244 in Sekondi-Takoradi and USD1,743 in Accra. There were important disparities between FSTPs due to their scale, age, and level of treatment and monitoring. Currently, most FSTPs charge tipping fees that range between USD310 and USD530/1000 m(3) of FS, averaging USD421 ± 98/1000 m(3) of FS discharged at FSTPs. Our study also showed that the OM&M costs of large-scale intensive FSTPs cannot be sustained by relying solely on tipping fees. However, there could be potential to cover the routine expenditures associated with operating smaller FSTPs that relying on WSP technologies. Academic Press 2022-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8759011/ /pubmed/34844055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114125 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Tanoh, Rebecca Nikiema, Josiane Asiedu, Zipporah Jayathilake, Nilanthi Cofie, Olufunke The contribution of tipping fees to the operation, maintenance, and management of fecal sludge treatment plants: The case of Ghana |
title | The contribution of tipping fees to the operation, maintenance, and management of fecal sludge treatment plants: The case of Ghana |
title_full | The contribution of tipping fees to the operation, maintenance, and management of fecal sludge treatment plants: The case of Ghana |
title_fullStr | The contribution of tipping fees to the operation, maintenance, and management of fecal sludge treatment plants: The case of Ghana |
title_full_unstemmed | The contribution of tipping fees to the operation, maintenance, and management of fecal sludge treatment plants: The case of Ghana |
title_short | The contribution of tipping fees to the operation, maintenance, and management of fecal sludge treatment plants: The case of Ghana |
title_sort | contribution of tipping fees to the operation, maintenance, and management of fecal sludge treatment plants: the case of ghana |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8759011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34844055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114125 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanohrebecca thecontributionoftippingfeestotheoperationmaintenanceandmanagementoffecalsludgetreatmentplantsthecaseofghana AT nikiemajosiane thecontributionoftippingfeestotheoperationmaintenanceandmanagementoffecalsludgetreatmentplantsthecaseofghana AT asieduzipporah thecontributionoftippingfeestotheoperationmaintenanceandmanagementoffecalsludgetreatmentplantsthecaseofghana AT jayathilakenilanthi thecontributionoftippingfeestotheoperationmaintenanceandmanagementoffecalsludgetreatmentplantsthecaseofghana AT cofieolufunke thecontributionoftippingfeestotheoperationmaintenanceandmanagementoffecalsludgetreatmentplantsthecaseofghana AT tanohrebecca contributionoftippingfeestotheoperationmaintenanceandmanagementoffecalsludgetreatmentplantsthecaseofghana AT nikiemajosiane contributionoftippingfeestotheoperationmaintenanceandmanagementoffecalsludgetreatmentplantsthecaseofghana AT asieduzipporah contributionoftippingfeestotheoperationmaintenanceandmanagementoffecalsludgetreatmentplantsthecaseofghana AT jayathilakenilanthi contributionoftippingfeestotheoperationmaintenanceandmanagementoffecalsludgetreatmentplantsthecaseofghana AT cofieolufunke contributionoftippingfeestotheoperationmaintenanceandmanagementoffecalsludgetreatmentplantsthecaseofghana |