Cargando…

The contribution of tipping fees to the operation, maintenance, and management of fecal sludge treatment plants: The case of Ghana

Globally, collection of tipping fees is being promoted as a solution to sustain the operation of fecal sludge treatment plants (FSTPs). Currently, there are six large-scale FSTPs in Ghana, of which five were in operation in June 2017. In Kumasi, Sekondi-Takoradi and Tamale, fecal sludge (FS) is co-t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanoh, Rebecca, Nikiema, Josiane, Asiedu, Zipporah, Jayathilake, Nilanthi, Cofie, Olufunke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8759011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34844055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114125
_version_ 1784633024616333312
author Tanoh, Rebecca
Nikiema, Josiane
Asiedu, Zipporah
Jayathilake, Nilanthi
Cofie, Olufunke
author_facet Tanoh, Rebecca
Nikiema, Josiane
Asiedu, Zipporah
Jayathilake, Nilanthi
Cofie, Olufunke
author_sort Tanoh, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description Globally, collection of tipping fees is being promoted as a solution to sustain the operation of fecal sludge treatment plants (FSTPs). Currently, there are six large-scale FSTPs in Ghana, of which five were in operation in June 2017. In Kumasi, Sekondi-Takoradi and Tamale, fecal sludge (FS) is co-treated with landfill leachate using waste stabilization ponds (WSPs). In Tema and Accra, FS is treated using WSPs and a mechanical dewatering system coupled with an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB). The focus of this study is FSTPs and to assess how, and if, the tipping fees set by the municipalities could enable cost recovery to sustain their long-term operation. Using a questionnaire survey to interview plant managers from the public and private sectors, and directors of waste management departments, we found that the overall average operation, maintenance and management (OM&M) costs per 1000 m(3) of treated waste (FS or FS + leachate) in 2017 were USD89 in Kumasi, USD150 in Tamale, USD179 in Tema, USD244 in Sekondi-Takoradi and USD1,743 in Accra. There were important disparities between FSTPs due to their scale, age, and level of treatment and monitoring. Currently, most FSTPs charge tipping fees that range between USD310 and USD530/1000 m(3) of FS, averaging USD421 ± 98/1000 m(3) of FS discharged at FSTPs. Our study also showed that the OM&M costs of large-scale intensive FSTPs cannot be sustained by relying solely on tipping fees. However, there could be potential to cover the routine expenditures associated with operating smaller FSTPs that relying on WSP technologies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8759011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87590112022-02-01 The contribution of tipping fees to the operation, maintenance, and management of fecal sludge treatment plants: The case of Ghana Tanoh, Rebecca Nikiema, Josiane Asiedu, Zipporah Jayathilake, Nilanthi Cofie, Olufunke J Environ Manage Article Globally, collection of tipping fees is being promoted as a solution to sustain the operation of fecal sludge treatment plants (FSTPs). Currently, there are six large-scale FSTPs in Ghana, of which five were in operation in June 2017. In Kumasi, Sekondi-Takoradi and Tamale, fecal sludge (FS) is co-treated with landfill leachate using waste stabilization ponds (WSPs). In Tema and Accra, FS is treated using WSPs and a mechanical dewatering system coupled with an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB). The focus of this study is FSTPs and to assess how, and if, the tipping fees set by the municipalities could enable cost recovery to sustain their long-term operation. Using a questionnaire survey to interview plant managers from the public and private sectors, and directors of waste management departments, we found that the overall average operation, maintenance and management (OM&M) costs per 1000 m(3) of treated waste (FS or FS + leachate) in 2017 were USD89 in Kumasi, USD150 in Tamale, USD179 in Tema, USD244 in Sekondi-Takoradi and USD1,743 in Accra. There were important disparities between FSTPs due to their scale, age, and level of treatment and monitoring. Currently, most FSTPs charge tipping fees that range between USD310 and USD530/1000 m(3) of FS, averaging USD421 ± 98/1000 m(3) of FS discharged at FSTPs. Our study also showed that the OM&M costs of large-scale intensive FSTPs cannot be sustained by relying solely on tipping fees. However, there could be potential to cover the routine expenditures associated with operating smaller FSTPs that relying on WSP technologies. Academic Press 2022-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8759011/ /pubmed/34844055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114125 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tanoh, Rebecca
Nikiema, Josiane
Asiedu, Zipporah
Jayathilake, Nilanthi
Cofie, Olufunke
The contribution of tipping fees to the operation, maintenance, and management of fecal sludge treatment plants: The case of Ghana
title The contribution of tipping fees to the operation, maintenance, and management of fecal sludge treatment plants: The case of Ghana
title_full The contribution of tipping fees to the operation, maintenance, and management of fecal sludge treatment plants: The case of Ghana
title_fullStr The contribution of tipping fees to the operation, maintenance, and management of fecal sludge treatment plants: The case of Ghana
title_full_unstemmed The contribution of tipping fees to the operation, maintenance, and management of fecal sludge treatment plants: The case of Ghana
title_short The contribution of tipping fees to the operation, maintenance, and management of fecal sludge treatment plants: The case of Ghana
title_sort contribution of tipping fees to the operation, maintenance, and management of fecal sludge treatment plants: the case of ghana
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8759011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34844055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114125
work_keys_str_mv AT tanohrebecca thecontributionoftippingfeestotheoperationmaintenanceandmanagementoffecalsludgetreatmentplantsthecaseofghana
AT nikiemajosiane thecontributionoftippingfeestotheoperationmaintenanceandmanagementoffecalsludgetreatmentplantsthecaseofghana
AT asieduzipporah thecontributionoftippingfeestotheoperationmaintenanceandmanagementoffecalsludgetreatmentplantsthecaseofghana
AT jayathilakenilanthi thecontributionoftippingfeestotheoperationmaintenanceandmanagementoffecalsludgetreatmentplantsthecaseofghana
AT cofieolufunke thecontributionoftippingfeestotheoperationmaintenanceandmanagementoffecalsludgetreatmentplantsthecaseofghana
AT tanohrebecca contributionoftippingfeestotheoperationmaintenanceandmanagementoffecalsludgetreatmentplantsthecaseofghana
AT nikiemajosiane contributionoftippingfeestotheoperationmaintenanceandmanagementoffecalsludgetreatmentplantsthecaseofghana
AT asieduzipporah contributionoftippingfeestotheoperationmaintenanceandmanagementoffecalsludgetreatmentplantsthecaseofghana
AT jayathilakenilanthi contributionoftippingfeestotheoperationmaintenanceandmanagementoffecalsludgetreatmentplantsthecaseofghana
AT cofieolufunke contributionoftippingfeestotheoperationmaintenanceandmanagementoffecalsludgetreatmentplantsthecaseofghana