Cargando…

Prediction of Pancreatic Cancer in Diabetes Patients with Worsening Glycemic Control

BACKGROUND: Worsening glycemic control indicates elevated risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We developed prediction models for PDAC among those with worsening glycemic control after diabetes diagnosis. METHODS: In 2000–2016 records within the Veterans Affairs Health System (VA), we id...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeon, Christie Y., Kim, Sungjin, Lin, Yu-Chen, Risch, Harvey A., Goodarzi, Mark O., Nuckols, Teryl K., Freedland, Stephen J., Pandol, Stephen J., Pisegna, Joseph R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association for Cancer Research 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8759109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34728468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0712
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Worsening glycemic control indicates elevated risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We developed prediction models for PDAC among those with worsening glycemic control after diabetes diagnosis. METHODS: In 2000–2016 records within the Veterans Affairs Health System (VA), we identified three cohorts with progression of diabetes: (i) insulin initiation (n = 449,685), (ii) initiation of combination oral hypoglycemic medication (n = 414,460), and (iii) hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥8% with ≥Δ1% within 15 months (n = 593,401). We computed 12-, 36-, and 60-month incidence of PDAC and developed prediction models separately for males and females, with consideration of >30 demographic, behavioral, clinical, and laboratory variables. Models were selected to optimize Akaike's Information Criterion, and performance for predicting 12-, 36-, and 60-month incident PDAC was evaluated by bootstrap. RESULTS: Incidence of PDAC was highest for insulin initiators and greater in males than in females. Optimism-corrected c-indices of the models for predicting 36-month incidence of PDAC in the male population were: (i) 0.72, (ii) 0.70, and (iii) 0.71, respectively. Models performed better for predicting 12-month incident PDAC [c-index (i) 0.78, (ii) 0.73, (iii) 0.76 for males], and worse for predicting 60-month incident PDAC [c-index (i) 0.69, (ii) 0.67, (iii) 0.68 for males]. Model performance was lower among females. For subjects whose model-predicted 36-month PDAC risks were ≥1%, the observed incidences were (i) 1.9%, (ii) 2.2%, and (iii) 1.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Sex-specific models for PDAC can estimate risk of PDAC at the time of progression of diabetes. IMPACT: Our models can identify diabetes patients who would benefit from PDAC screening.