Cargando…
What do patients experience? Interprofessional collaborative practice for chronic conditions in primary care: an integrative review
BACKGROUND: Improving the patient experience is one of the quadruple aims of healthcare. Therefore, understanding patient experiences and perceptions of healthcare interactions is paramount to quality improvement. This integrative review aimed to explore how patients with chronic conditions experien...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8759162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01595-6 |
_version_ | 1784633055315492864 |
---|---|
author | Davidson, Alexandra R. Kelly, Jaimon Ball, Lauren Morgan, Mark Reidlinger, Dianne P. |
author_facet | Davidson, Alexandra R. Kelly, Jaimon Ball, Lauren Morgan, Mark Reidlinger, Dianne P. |
author_sort | Davidson, Alexandra R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Improving the patient experience is one of the quadruple aims of healthcare. Therefore, understanding patient experiences and perceptions of healthcare interactions is paramount to quality improvement. This integrative review aimed to explore how patients with chronic conditions experience Interprofessional Collaborative Practice in primary care. METHODS: An integrative review was conducted to comprehensively synthesize primary studies that used qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. Databases searched were Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science on June 1st, 2021. Eligible studies were empirical full-text studies in primary care that reported experiences or perceptions of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice by adult patients with a chronic condition, in any language published in any year. Quality appraisal was conducted on included studies using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool. Data on patients’ experiences and perceptions of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice in primary care were extracted, and findings were thematically analyzed through a meta-synthesis. RESULTS: Forty-eight (n = 48) studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of n = 3803 participants. Study quality of individual studies was limited by study design, incomplete reporting, and the potential for positive publication bias. Three themes and their sub-themes were developed inductively: (1) Interacting with Healthcare Teams, subthemes: widening the network, connecting with professionals, looking beyond the condition, and overcoming chronic condition collectively; (2) Valuing Convenient Healthcare, subthemes: sharing space and time, care planning creates structure, coordinating care, valuing the general practitioner role, and affording healthcare; (3) Engaging Self-care, subthemes: engaging passively is circumstantial, and, engaging actively and leading care. CONCLUSIONS: Patients overwhelmingly had positive experiences of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice, signaling it is appropriate for chronic condition management in primary care. The patient role in managing their chronic condition was closely linked to their experience. Future studies should investigate how the patient role impacts the experience of patients, carers, and health professionals in this context. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42020156536. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01595-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8759162 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87591622022-01-18 What do patients experience? Interprofessional collaborative practice for chronic conditions in primary care: an integrative review Davidson, Alexandra R. Kelly, Jaimon Ball, Lauren Morgan, Mark Reidlinger, Dianne P. BMC Prim Care Research BACKGROUND: Improving the patient experience is one of the quadruple aims of healthcare. Therefore, understanding patient experiences and perceptions of healthcare interactions is paramount to quality improvement. This integrative review aimed to explore how patients with chronic conditions experience Interprofessional Collaborative Practice in primary care. METHODS: An integrative review was conducted to comprehensively synthesize primary studies that used qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. Databases searched were Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science on June 1st, 2021. Eligible studies were empirical full-text studies in primary care that reported experiences or perceptions of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice by adult patients with a chronic condition, in any language published in any year. Quality appraisal was conducted on included studies using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool. Data on patients’ experiences and perceptions of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice in primary care were extracted, and findings were thematically analyzed through a meta-synthesis. RESULTS: Forty-eight (n = 48) studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of n = 3803 participants. Study quality of individual studies was limited by study design, incomplete reporting, and the potential for positive publication bias. Three themes and their sub-themes were developed inductively: (1) Interacting with Healthcare Teams, subthemes: widening the network, connecting with professionals, looking beyond the condition, and overcoming chronic condition collectively; (2) Valuing Convenient Healthcare, subthemes: sharing space and time, care planning creates structure, coordinating care, valuing the general practitioner role, and affording healthcare; (3) Engaging Self-care, subthemes: engaging passively is circumstantial, and, engaging actively and leading care. CONCLUSIONS: Patients overwhelmingly had positive experiences of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice, signaling it is appropriate for chronic condition management in primary care. The patient role in managing their chronic condition was closely linked to their experience. Future studies should investigate how the patient role impacts the experience of patients, carers, and health professionals in this context. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42020156536. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01595-6. BioMed Central 2022-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8759162/ /pubmed/35172731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01595-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Davidson, Alexandra R. Kelly, Jaimon Ball, Lauren Morgan, Mark Reidlinger, Dianne P. What do patients experience? Interprofessional collaborative practice for chronic conditions in primary care: an integrative review |
title | What do patients experience? Interprofessional collaborative practice for chronic conditions in primary care: an integrative review |
title_full | What do patients experience? Interprofessional collaborative practice for chronic conditions in primary care: an integrative review |
title_fullStr | What do patients experience? Interprofessional collaborative practice for chronic conditions in primary care: an integrative review |
title_full_unstemmed | What do patients experience? Interprofessional collaborative practice for chronic conditions in primary care: an integrative review |
title_short | What do patients experience? Interprofessional collaborative practice for chronic conditions in primary care: an integrative review |
title_sort | what do patients experience? interprofessional collaborative practice for chronic conditions in primary care: an integrative review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8759162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01595-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davidsonalexandrar whatdopatientsexperienceinterprofessionalcollaborativepracticeforchronicconditionsinprimarycareanintegrativereview AT kellyjaimon whatdopatientsexperienceinterprofessionalcollaborativepracticeforchronicconditionsinprimarycareanintegrativereview AT balllauren whatdopatientsexperienceinterprofessionalcollaborativepracticeforchronicconditionsinprimarycareanintegrativereview AT morganmark whatdopatientsexperienceinterprofessionalcollaborativepracticeforchronicconditionsinprimarycareanintegrativereview AT reidlingerdiannep whatdopatientsexperienceinterprofessionalcollaborativepracticeforchronicconditionsinprimarycareanintegrativereview |