Cargando…

Surgical Clipping Versus Endovascular Coiling in the Management of Intracranial Aneurysms

Intracranial aneurysms are pathological dilatations of intracranial arteries and prevail in around 3.2% of the general population. The worst outcome of an aneurysm is its rupture. Its prevention and management can be accomplished by two broad modalities: surgical clipping and endovascular coiling. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Belavadi, Rishab, Gudigopuram, Sri Vallabh Reddy, Raguthu, Ciri C, Gajjela, Harini, Kela, Iljena, Kakarala, Chandra L, Hassan, Mohammad, Sange, Ibrahim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35047297
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20478
_version_ 1784633225066315776
author Belavadi, Rishab
Gudigopuram, Sri Vallabh Reddy
Raguthu, Ciri C
Gajjela, Harini
Kela, Iljena
Kakarala, Chandra L
Hassan, Mohammad
Sange, Ibrahim
author_facet Belavadi, Rishab
Gudigopuram, Sri Vallabh Reddy
Raguthu, Ciri C
Gajjela, Harini
Kela, Iljena
Kakarala, Chandra L
Hassan, Mohammad
Sange, Ibrahim
author_sort Belavadi, Rishab
collection PubMed
description Intracranial aneurysms are pathological dilatations of intracranial arteries and prevail in around 3.2% of the general population. The worst outcome of an aneurysm is its rupture. Its prevention and management can be accomplished by two broad modalities: surgical clipping and endovascular coiling. This review has explored each of these approaches individually and has then directly compared them to provide a good understanding of their respective advantages and disadvantages over one another. Clipping is associated with a higher rate of occlusion of the aneurysm and lower rates of residual and recurrent aneurysms, whereas coiling is associated with lower morbidity and mortality and a better postoperative course. The risks and benefits of each of these procedures must be thoroughly examined in each case. This article has stressed the need to consider all contributing patient, procedure-related, surgeon-related, and hospital factors before arriving at a final decision to manage a specific case.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8760002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87600022022-01-18 Surgical Clipping Versus Endovascular Coiling in the Management of Intracranial Aneurysms Belavadi, Rishab Gudigopuram, Sri Vallabh Reddy Raguthu, Ciri C Gajjela, Harini Kela, Iljena Kakarala, Chandra L Hassan, Mohammad Sange, Ibrahim Cureus Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery Intracranial aneurysms are pathological dilatations of intracranial arteries and prevail in around 3.2% of the general population. The worst outcome of an aneurysm is its rupture. Its prevention and management can be accomplished by two broad modalities: surgical clipping and endovascular coiling. This review has explored each of these approaches individually and has then directly compared them to provide a good understanding of their respective advantages and disadvantages over one another. Clipping is associated with a higher rate of occlusion of the aneurysm and lower rates of residual and recurrent aneurysms, whereas coiling is associated with lower morbidity and mortality and a better postoperative course. The risks and benefits of each of these procedures must be thoroughly examined in each case. This article has stressed the need to consider all contributing patient, procedure-related, surgeon-related, and hospital factors before arriving at a final decision to manage a specific case. Cureus 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8760002/ /pubmed/35047297 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20478 Text en Copyright © 2021, Belavadi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery
Belavadi, Rishab
Gudigopuram, Sri Vallabh Reddy
Raguthu, Ciri C
Gajjela, Harini
Kela, Iljena
Kakarala, Chandra L
Hassan, Mohammad
Sange, Ibrahim
Surgical Clipping Versus Endovascular Coiling in the Management of Intracranial Aneurysms
title Surgical Clipping Versus Endovascular Coiling in the Management of Intracranial Aneurysms
title_full Surgical Clipping Versus Endovascular Coiling in the Management of Intracranial Aneurysms
title_fullStr Surgical Clipping Versus Endovascular Coiling in the Management of Intracranial Aneurysms
title_full_unstemmed Surgical Clipping Versus Endovascular Coiling in the Management of Intracranial Aneurysms
title_short Surgical Clipping Versus Endovascular Coiling in the Management of Intracranial Aneurysms
title_sort surgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in the management of intracranial aneurysms
topic Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35047297
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20478
work_keys_str_mv AT belavadirishab surgicalclippingversusendovascularcoilinginthemanagementofintracranialaneurysms
AT gudigopuramsrivallabhreddy surgicalclippingversusendovascularcoilinginthemanagementofintracranialaneurysms
AT raguthuciric surgicalclippingversusendovascularcoilinginthemanagementofintracranialaneurysms
AT gajjelaharini surgicalclippingversusendovascularcoilinginthemanagementofintracranialaneurysms
AT kelailjena surgicalclippingversusendovascularcoilinginthemanagementofintracranialaneurysms
AT kakaralachandral surgicalclippingversusendovascularcoilinginthemanagementofintracranialaneurysms
AT hassanmohammad surgicalclippingversusendovascularcoilinginthemanagementofintracranialaneurysms
AT sangeibrahim surgicalclippingversusendovascularcoilinginthemanagementofintracranialaneurysms