Cargando…

Are Chinese social scientists concerned about climate change? A bibliometric analysis and literature review

China has been the world’s largest emitter of carbon dioxide since 2006. To achieve the goal of carbon neutrality by 2060, social scientists must become involved in China’s deep decarbonization process. However, Chinese social scientists have given little attention to climate change in their bibliom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhong, Fanglei, Cheng, Wenru, Guo, Aijun, Song, Xiaoyu, Cheng, Qingping, Ullah, Asmat, Song, Yuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35031995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18010-3
_version_ 1784633254137036800
author Zhong, Fanglei
Cheng, Wenru
Guo, Aijun
Song, Xiaoyu
Cheng, Qingping
Ullah, Asmat
Song, Yuan
author_facet Zhong, Fanglei
Cheng, Wenru
Guo, Aijun
Song, Xiaoyu
Cheng, Qingping
Ullah, Asmat
Song, Yuan
author_sort Zhong, Fanglei
collection PubMed
description China has been the world’s largest emitter of carbon dioxide since 2006. To achieve the goal of carbon neutrality by 2060, social scientists must become involved in China’s deep decarbonization process. However, Chinese social scientists have given little attention to climate change in their bibliometric research. Based on the Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index journal catalog of the four essential social sciences, namely, management, economics, politics, and sociology, we used the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database to quantify the extent to which Chinese social scientists are concerned about climate change. The results showed that from 1978 to 2020, 1179 articles on climate change were published in management, economics, politics, and sociology journals, which represented only 26.8% of the 4397 articles published on pollution in the same journals. Politics journals published the most articles (38.76%), while sociology journals published the fewest (2.37%). Thus, Chinese social scientists rarely considered climate change, mainly because this topic remains controversial in some fields and because of the influence of international politics in addition to the promotion and incentive mechanisms for researchers. We analyzed the keywords and evolution of climate change research in the four social sciences and our results show that social scientists should give greater emphasis to climate change in their research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8760126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87601262022-01-18 Are Chinese social scientists concerned about climate change? A bibliometric analysis and literature review Zhong, Fanglei Cheng, Wenru Guo, Aijun Song, Xiaoyu Cheng, Qingping Ullah, Asmat Song, Yuan Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Review Article China has been the world’s largest emitter of carbon dioxide since 2006. To achieve the goal of carbon neutrality by 2060, social scientists must become involved in China’s deep decarbonization process. However, Chinese social scientists have given little attention to climate change in their bibliometric research. Based on the Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index journal catalog of the four essential social sciences, namely, management, economics, politics, and sociology, we used the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database to quantify the extent to which Chinese social scientists are concerned about climate change. The results showed that from 1978 to 2020, 1179 articles on climate change were published in management, economics, politics, and sociology journals, which represented only 26.8% of the 4397 articles published on pollution in the same journals. Politics journals published the most articles (38.76%), while sociology journals published the fewest (2.37%). Thus, Chinese social scientists rarely considered climate change, mainly because this topic remains controversial in some fields and because of the influence of international politics in addition to the promotion and incentive mechanisms for researchers. We analyzed the keywords and evolution of climate change research in the four social sciences and our results show that social scientists should give greater emphasis to climate change in their research. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-01-15 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8760126/ /pubmed/35031995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18010-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Review Article
Zhong, Fanglei
Cheng, Wenru
Guo, Aijun
Song, Xiaoyu
Cheng, Qingping
Ullah, Asmat
Song, Yuan
Are Chinese social scientists concerned about climate change? A bibliometric analysis and literature review
title Are Chinese social scientists concerned about climate change? A bibliometric analysis and literature review
title_full Are Chinese social scientists concerned about climate change? A bibliometric analysis and literature review
title_fullStr Are Chinese social scientists concerned about climate change? A bibliometric analysis and literature review
title_full_unstemmed Are Chinese social scientists concerned about climate change? A bibliometric analysis and literature review
title_short Are Chinese social scientists concerned about climate change? A bibliometric analysis and literature review
title_sort are chinese social scientists concerned about climate change? a bibliometric analysis and literature review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35031995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18010-3
work_keys_str_mv AT zhongfanglei arechinesesocialscientistsconcernedaboutclimatechangeabibliometricanalysisandliteraturereview
AT chengwenru arechinesesocialscientistsconcernedaboutclimatechangeabibliometricanalysisandliteraturereview
AT guoaijun arechinesesocialscientistsconcernedaboutclimatechangeabibliometricanalysisandliteraturereview
AT songxiaoyu arechinesesocialscientistsconcernedaboutclimatechangeabibliometricanalysisandliteraturereview
AT chengqingping arechinesesocialscientistsconcernedaboutclimatechangeabibliometricanalysisandliteraturereview
AT ullahasmat arechinesesocialscientistsconcernedaboutclimatechangeabibliometricanalysisandliteraturereview
AT songyuan arechinesesocialscientistsconcernedaboutclimatechangeabibliometricanalysisandliteraturereview