Cargando…

Comparison of chest CT severity scoring systems for COVID-19

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance and inter-observer agreement of five different CT chest severity scoring systems for COVID-19 to find the most precise one with the least interpretation time. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This retrospective study included 85 patients (54 male and 31 female) w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elmokadem, Ali H., Mounir, Ahmad M., Ramadan, Zainab A., Elsedeiq, Mahmoud, Saleh, Gehad A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35031841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08432-5
_version_ 1784633255978336256
author Elmokadem, Ali H.
Mounir, Ahmad M.
Ramadan, Zainab A.
Elsedeiq, Mahmoud
Saleh, Gehad A.
author_facet Elmokadem, Ali H.
Mounir, Ahmad M.
Ramadan, Zainab A.
Elsedeiq, Mahmoud
Saleh, Gehad A.
author_sort Elmokadem, Ali H.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance and inter-observer agreement of five different CT chest severity scoring systems for COVID-19 to find the most precise one with the least interpretation time. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This retrospective study included 85 patients (54 male and 31 female) with PCR-confirmed COVID-19. They underwent CT to assess the severity of pulmonary involvement. Three readers were asked to assess the pulmonary abnormalities and score the severity using five different systems, including chest CT severity score (CT-SS), chest CT score, total severity score (TSS), modified total severity score (m-TSS), and 3-level chest CT severity score. Time consumption on reporting of each system was calculated. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-five observations were reported for each system. There was a statistically significant inter-observer agreement in assessing qualitative lung involvement using the m-TSS and the other four quantitative systems. The ROC curves revealed excellent and very good diagnostic accuracy for all systems when cutoff values for detection severe cases were > 22, > 17, > 12, and > 26 for CT-SS, chest CT score, TSS, and 3-level CT severity score. The AUC was very good (0.86), excellent (0.90), very good (0.89), and very good (0.86), respectively. Chest CT score showed the highest specificity (95.2%) in discrimination of severe cases. Time consumption on reporting was significantly different (< 0.001): CT-SS > 3L-CT-SS > chest CT score > TSS. CONCLUSION: All chest CT severity scoring systems in this study demonstrated excellent inter-observer agreement and reasonable performance to assess COVID-19 in relation to the clinical severity. CT-SS and TSS had the highest specificity and least time for interpretation. KEY POINTS: • All chest CT severity scoring systems discussed in this study revealed excellent inter-observer agreement and reasonable performance to assess COVID-19 in relation to the clinical severity. • Chest CT scoring system and TSS had the highest specificity. • Both TSS and m-TSS consumed the least time compared to the other three scoring systems. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-08432-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8760133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87601332022-01-18 Comparison of chest CT severity scoring systems for COVID-19 Elmokadem, Ali H. Mounir, Ahmad M. Ramadan, Zainab A. Elsedeiq, Mahmoud Saleh, Gehad A. Eur Radiol Chest PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance and inter-observer agreement of five different CT chest severity scoring systems for COVID-19 to find the most precise one with the least interpretation time. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This retrospective study included 85 patients (54 male and 31 female) with PCR-confirmed COVID-19. They underwent CT to assess the severity of pulmonary involvement. Three readers were asked to assess the pulmonary abnormalities and score the severity using five different systems, including chest CT severity score (CT-SS), chest CT score, total severity score (TSS), modified total severity score (m-TSS), and 3-level chest CT severity score. Time consumption on reporting of each system was calculated. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-five observations were reported for each system. There was a statistically significant inter-observer agreement in assessing qualitative lung involvement using the m-TSS and the other four quantitative systems. The ROC curves revealed excellent and very good diagnostic accuracy for all systems when cutoff values for detection severe cases were > 22, > 17, > 12, and > 26 for CT-SS, chest CT score, TSS, and 3-level CT severity score. The AUC was very good (0.86), excellent (0.90), very good (0.89), and very good (0.86), respectively. Chest CT score showed the highest specificity (95.2%) in discrimination of severe cases. Time consumption on reporting was significantly different (< 0.001): CT-SS > 3L-CT-SS > chest CT score > TSS. CONCLUSION: All chest CT severity scoring systems in this study demonstrated excellent inter-observer agreement and reasonable performance to assess COVID-19 in relation to the clinical severity. CT-SS and TSS had the highest specificity and least time for interpretation. KEY POINTS: • All chest CT severity scoring systems discussed in this study revealed excellent inter-observer agreement and reasonable performance to assess COVID-19 in relation to the clinical severity. • Chest CT scoring system and TSS had the highest specificity. • Both TSS and m-TSS consumed the least time compared to the other three scoring systems. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-08432-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-01-15 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8760133/ /pubmed/35031841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08432-5 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Chest
Elmokadem, Ali H.
Mounir, Ahmad M.
Ramadan, Zainab A.
Elsedeiq, Mahmoud
Saleh, Gehad A.
Comparison of chest CT severity scoring systems for COVID-19
title Comparison of chest CT severity scoring systems for COVID-19
title_full Comparison of chest CT severity scoring systems for COVID-19
title_fullStr Comparison of chest CT severity scoring systems for COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of chest CT severity scoring systems for COVID-19
title_short Comparison of chest CT severity scoring systems for COVID-19
title_sort comparison of chest ct severity scoring systems for covid-19
topic Chest
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35031841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08432-5
work_keys_str_mv AT elmokademalih comparisonofchestctseverityscoringsystemsforcovid19
AT mounirahmadm comparisonofchestctseverityscoringsystemsforcovid19
AT ramadanzainaba comparisonofchestctseverityscoringsystemsforcovid19
AT elsedeiqmahmoud comparisonofchestctseverityscoringsystemsforcovid19
AT salehgehada comparisonofchestctseverityscoringsystemsforcovid19