Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies have shown promising prospects in colorectal cancer (CRC) immunotherapy; many clinical trials have been carried out. In this study, we sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICI therapies in CRC by presenting a meta-analysi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeng, Tianni, Fang, Xiaojie, Lu, Jinhua, Zhong, Yazhen, Lin, Xianlei, Lin, Zechen, Wang, Nan, Jiang, Jing, Lin, Shengyou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34716473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-04028-z
_version_ 1784633269382283264
author Zeng, Tianni
Fang, Xiaojie
Lu, Jinhua
Zhong, Yazhen
Lin, Xianlei
Lin, Zechen
Wang, Nan
Jiang, Jing
Lin, Shengyou
author_facet Zeng, Tianni
Fang, Xiaojie
Lu, Jinhua
Zhong, Yazhen
Lin, Xianlei
Lin, Zechen
Wang, Nan
Jiang, Jing
Lin, Shengyou
author_sort Zeng, Tianni
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies have shown promising prospects in colorectal cancer (CRC) immunotherapy; many clinical trials have been carried out. In this study, we sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICI therapies in CRC by presenting a meta-analysis of relevant studies. METHODS: Databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies concerning the efficacy and safety of ICI in colorectal cancer. The reported odds ratio (OR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and TRAEs ≥ 3 in the included studies were analyzed by fixed effects/random effects models. RESULTS: Three studies involving 667 patients with colorectal cancer were included in our meta-analysis. No significant difference between the immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies and conventional therapies in OS (WMD = 0.73, 95% CI − 3.09, 4.54; p = 0.71), in ORR (OR = 1.54, 95% CI 0.98, 2.40; p = 0.06), and in DCR (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.36, 2.61; p = 0.95). The median PFS of the ICI therapy group was shorter than that of the conventional therapy group (WMD =  − 0.10, 95% CI − 0.18, − 0.02; p = 0.02). At the same time, we also could not find a significant difference between the immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies and conventional therapies in TRAEs (OR = 1.56, 95% CI 0.11, 22.09; p = 0.74) and in TRAEs ≥ 3 (OR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.16, 5.65; p = 0.95). CONCLUSION: Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies could not improve all survival endpoints to advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Whether immune checkpoint inhibitors should be the first choice of therapies for colorectal cancer patients with undetermined microsatellite status or not able to determine microsatellite status needs more related studies to prove.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8760220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87602202022-01-26 Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zeng, Tianni Fang, Xiaojie Lu, Jinhua Zhong, Yazhen Lin, Xianlei Lin, Zechen Wang, Nan Jiang, Jing Lin, Shengyou Int J Colorectal Dis Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies have shown promising prospects in colorectal cancer (CRC) immunotherapy; many clinical trials have been carried out. In this study, we sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICI therapies in CRC by presenting a meta-analysis of relevant studies. METHODS: Databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies concerning the efficacy and safety of ICI in colorectal cancer. The reported odds ratio (OR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and TRAEs ≥ 3 in the included studies were analyzed by fixed effects/random effects models. RESULTS: Three studies involving 667 patients with colorectal cancer were included in our meta-analysis. No significant difference between the immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies and conventional therapies in OS (WMD = 0.73, 95% CI − 3.09, 4.54; p = 0.71), in ORR (OR = 1.54, 95% CI 0.98, 2.40; p = 0.06), and in DCR (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.36, 2.61; p = 0.95). The median PFS of the ICI therapy group was shorter than that of the conventional therapy group (WMD =  − 0.10, 95% CI − 0.18, − 0.02; p = 0.02). At the same time, we also could not find a significant difference between the immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies and conventional therapies in TRAEs (OR = 1.56, 95% CI 0.11, 22.09; p = 0.74) and in TRAEs ≥ 3 (OR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.16, 5.65; p = 0.95). CONCLUSION: Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies could not improve all survival endpoints to advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Whether immune checkpoint inhibitors should be the first choice of therapies for colorectal cancer patients with undetermined microsatellite status or not able to determine microsatellite status needs more related studies to prove. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-10-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8760220/ /pubmed/34716473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-04028-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Zeng, Tianni
Fang, Xiaojie
Lu, Jinhua
Zhong, Yazhen
Lin, Xianlei
Lin, Zechen
Wang, Nan
Jiang, Jing
Lin, Shengyou
Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34716473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-04028-z
work_keys_str_mv AT zengtianni efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fangxiaojie efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lujinhua efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhongyazhen efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linxianlei efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linzechen efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangnan efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiangjing efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linshengyou efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis