Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies have shown promising prospects in colorectal cancer (CRC) immunotherapy; many clinical trials have been carried out. In this study, we sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICI therapies in CRC by presenting a meta-analysi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34716473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-04028-z |
_version_ | 1784633269382283264 |
---|---|
author | Zeng, Tianni Fang, Xiaojie Lu, Jinhua Zhong, Yazhen Lin, Xianlei Lin, Zechen Wang, Nan Jiang, Jing Lin, Shengyou |
author_facet | Zeng, Tianni Fang, Xiaojie Lu, Jinhua Zhong, Yazhen Lin, Xianlei Lin, Zechen Wang, Nan Jiang, Jing Lin, Shengyou |
author_sort | Zeng, Tianni |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies have shown promising prospects in colorectal cancer (CRC) immunotherapy; many clinical trials have been carried out. In this study, we sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICI therapies in CRC by presenting a meta-analysis of relevant studies. METHODS: Databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies concerning the efficacy and safety of ICI in colorectal cancer. The reported odds ratio (OR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and TRAEs ≥ 3 in the included studies were analyzed by fixed effects/random effects models. RESULTS: Three studies involving 667 patients with colorectal cancer were included in our meta-analysis. No significant difference between the immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies and conventional therapies in OS (WMD = 0.73, 95% CI − 3.09, 4.54; p = 0.71), in ORR (OR = 1.54, 95% CI 0.98, 2.40; p = 0.06), and in DCR (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.36, 2.61; p = 0.95). The median PFS of the ICI therapy group was shorter than that of the conventional therapy group (WMD = − 0.10, 95% CI − 0.18, − 0.02; p = 0.02). At the same time, we also could not find a significant difference between the immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies and conventional therapies in TRAEs (OR = 1.56, 95% CI 0.11, 22.09; p = 0.74) and in TRAEs ≥ 3 (OR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.16, 5.65; p = 0.95). CONCLUSION: Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies could not improve all survival endpoints to advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Whether immune checkpoint inhibitors should be the first choice of therapies for colorectal cancer patients with undetermined microsatellite status or not able to determine microsatellite status needs more related studies to prove. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8760220 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87602202022-01-26 Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zeng, Tianni Fang, Xiaojie Lu, Jinhua Zhong, Yazhen Lin, Xianlei Lin, Zechen Wang, Nan Jiang, Jing Lin, Shengyou Int J Colorectal Dis Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies have shown promising prospects in colorectal cancer (CRC) immunotherapy; many clinical trials have been carried out. In this study, we sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICI therapies in CRC by presenting a meta-analysis of relevant studies. METHODS: Databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies concerning the efficacy and safety of ICI in colorectal cancer. The reported odds ratio (OR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and TRAEs ≥ 3 in the included studies were analyzed by fixed effects/random effects models. RESULTS: Three studies involving 667 patients with colorectal cancer were included in our meta-analysis. No significant difference between the immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies and conventional therapies in OS (WMD = 0.73, 95% CI − 3.09, 4.54; p = 0.71), in ORR (OR = 1.54, 95% CI 0.98, 2.40; p = 0.06), and in DCR (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.36, 2.61; p = 0.95). The median PFS of the ICI therapy group was shorter than that of the conventional therapy group (WMD = − 0.10, 95% CI − 0.18, − 0.02; p = 0.02). At the same time, we also could not find a significant difference between the immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies and conventional therapies in TRAEs (OR = 1.56, 95% CI 0.11, 22.09; p = 0.74) and in TRAEs ≥ 3 (OR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.16, 5.65; p = 0.95). CONCLUSION: Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies could not improve all survival endpoints to advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Whether immune checkpoint inhibitors should be the first choice of therapies for colorectal cancer patients with undetermined microsatellite status or not able to determine microsatellite status needs more related studies to prove. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-10-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8760220/ /pubmed/34716473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-04028-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zeng, Tianni Fang, Xiaojie Lu, Jinhua Zhong, Yazhen Lin, Xianlei Lin, Zechen Wang, Nan Jiang, Jing Lin, Shengyou Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34716473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-04028-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zengtianni efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fangxiaojie efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lujinhua efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhongyazhen efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT linxianlei efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT linzechen efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangnan efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jiangjing efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT linshengyou efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |