Cargando…

Desertification risk fuels spatial polarization in ‘affected’ and ‘unaffected’ landscapes in Italy

Southern Europe is a hotspot for desertification risk because of the intimate impact of soil deterioration, landscape transformations, rising human pressure, and climate change. In this context, large-scale empirical analyses linking landscape fragmentation with desertification risk assume that incr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nickayin, Samaneh Sadat, Coluzzi, Rosa, Marucci, Alvaro, Bianchini, Leonardo, Salvati, Luca, Cudlin, Pavel, Imbrenda, Vito
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35031625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04638-1
_version_ 1784633281774354432
author Nickayin, Samaneh Sadat
Coluzzi, Rosa
Marucci, Alvaro
Bianchini, Leonardo
Salvati, Luca
Cudlin, Pavel
Imbrenda, Vito
author_facet Nickayin, Samaneh Sadat
Coluzzi, Rosa
Marucci, Alvaro
Bianchini, Leonardo
Salvati, Luca
Cudlin, Pavel
Imbrenda, Vito
author_sort Nickayin, Samaneh Sadat
collection PubMed
description Southern Europe is a hotspot for desertification risk because of the intimate impact of soil deterioration, landscape transformations, rising human pressure, and climate change. In this context, large-scale empirical analyses linking landscape fragmentation with desertification risk assume that increasing levels of land vulnerability to degradation are associated with significant changes in landscape structure. Using a traditional approach of landscape ecology, this study evaluates the spatial structure of a simulated landscape based on different levels of vulnerability to land degradation using 15 metrics calculated at three time points (early-1960s, early-1990s, early-2010s) in Italy. While the (average) level of land vulnerability increased over time almost in all Italian regions, vulnerable landscapes demonstrated to be increasingly fragmented, as far as the number of homogeneous patches and mean patch size are concerned. The spatial balance in affected and unaffected areas—typically observed in the 1960s—was progressively replaced with an intrinsically disordered landscape, and this process was more intense in regions exposed to higher (and increasing) levels of land degradation. The spread of larger land patches exposed to intrinsic degradation brings to important consequences since (1) the rising number of hotspots may increase the probability of local-scale degradation processes, and (2) the buffering effect of neighbouring (unaffected) land can be less effective on bigger hotspots, promoting a downward spiral toward desertification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8760270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87602702022-01-18 Desertification risk fuels spatial polarization in ‘affected’ and ‘unaffected’ landscapes in Italy Nickayin, Samaneh Sadat Coluzzi, Rosa Marucci, Alvaro Bianchini, Leonardo Salvati, Luca Cudlin, Pavel Imbrenda, Vito Sci Rep Article Southern Europe is a hotspot for desertification risk because of the intimate impact of soil deterioration, landscape transformations, rising human pressure, and climate change. In this context, large-scale empirical analyses linking landscape fragmentation with desertification risk assume that increasing levels of land vulnerability to degradation are associated with significant changes in landscape structure. Using a traditional approach of landscape ecology, this study evaluates the spatial structure of a simulated landscape based on different levels of vulnerability to land degradation using 15 metrics calculated at three time points (early-1960s, early-1990s, early-2010s) in Italy. While the (average) level of land vulnerability increased over time almost in all Italian regions, vulnerable landscapes demonstrated to be increasingly fragmented, as far as the number of homogeneous patches and mean patch size are concerned. The spatial balance in affected and unaffected areas—typically observed in the 1960s—was progressively replaced with an intrinsically disordered landscape, and this process was more intense in regions exposed to higher (and increasing) levels of land degradation. The spread of larger land patches exposed to intrinsic degradation brings to important consequences since (1) the rising number of hotspots may increase the probability of local-scale degradation processes, and (2) the buffering effect of neighbouring (unaffected) land can be less effective on bigger hotspots, promoting a downward spiral toward desertification. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8760270/ /pubmed/35031625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04638-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Nickayin, Samaneh Sadat
Coluzzi, Rosa
Marucci, Alvaro
Bianchini, Leonardo
Salvati, Luca
Cudlin, Pavel
Imbrenda, Vito
Desertification risk fuels spatial polarization in ‘affected’ and ‘unaffected’ landscapes in Italy
title Desertification risk fuels spatial polarization in ‘affected’ and ‘unaffected’ landscapes in Italy
title_full Desertification risk fuels spatial polarization in ‘affected’ and ‘unaffected’ landscapes in Italy
title_fullStr Desertification risk fuels spatial polarization in ‘affected’ and ‘unaffected’ landscapes in Italy
title_full_unstemmed Desertification risk fuels spatial polarization in ‘affected’ and ‘unaffected’ landscapes in Italy
title_short Desertification risk fuels spatial polarization in ‘affected’ and ‘unaffected’ landscapes in Italy
title_sort desertification risk fuels spatial polarization in ‘affected’ and ‘unaffected’ landscapes in italy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35031625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04638-1
work_keys_str_mv AT nickayinsamanehsadat desertificationriskfuelsspatialpolarizationinaffectedandunaffectedlandscapesinitaly
AT coluzzirosa desertificationriskfuelsspatialpolarizationinaffectedandunaffectedlandscapesinitaly
AT maruccialvaro desertificationriskfuelsspatialpolarizationinaffectedandunaffectedlandscapesinitaly
AT bianchinileonardo desertificationriskfuelsspatialpolarizationinaffectedandunaffectedlandscapesinitaly
AT salvatiluca desertificationriskfuelsspatialpolarizationinaffectedandunaffectedlandscapesinitaly
AT cudlinpavel desertificationriskfuelsspatialpolarizationinaffectedandunaffectedlandscapesinitaly
AT imbrendavito desertificationriskfuelsspatialpolarizationinaffectedandunaffectedlandscapesinitaly