Cargando…

Comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament

This prospective multicenter study, established by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and involving 27 institutions, aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between laminoplasty (LM) and posterior fusion (PF) for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakashima, Hiroaki, Imagama, Shiro, Yoshii, Toshitaka, Egawa, Satoru, Sakai, Kenichiro, Kusano, Kazuo, Nakagawa, Yukihiro, Hirai, Takashi, Wada, Kanichiro, Katsumi, Keiichi, Fujii, Kengo, Kimura, Atsushi, Furuya, Takeo, Kanchiku, Tsukasa, Nagamoto, Yukitaka, Oshima, Yasushi, Nagoshi, Narihito, Ando, Kei, Takahata, Masahiko, Mori, Kanji, Nakajima, Hideaki, Murata, Kazuma, Matsunaga, Shunji, Kaito, Takashi, Yamada, Kei, Kobayashi, Sho, Kato, Satoshi, Ohba, Tetsuro, Inami, Satoshi, Fujibayashi, Shunsuke, Katoh, Hiroyuki, Kanno, Haruo, Li, Yuanying, Yatsuya, Hiroshi, Koda, Masao, Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu, Takeshita, Katsushi, Matsumoto, Morio, Yamazaki, Masashi, Okawa, Atsushi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35031694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04727-1
_version_ 1784633298247483392
author Nakashima, Hiroaki
Imagama, Shiro
Yoshii, Toshitaka
Egawa, Satoru
Sakai, Kenichiro
Kusano, Kazuo
Nakagawa, Yukihiro
Hirai, Takashi
Wada, Kanichiro
Katsumi, Keiichi
Fujii, Kengo
Kimura, Atsushi
Furuya, Takeo
Kanchiku, Tsukasa
Nagamoto, Yukitaka
Oshima, Yasushi
Nagoshi, Narihito
Ando, Kei
Takahata, Masahiko
Mori, Kanji
Nakajima, Hideaki
Murata, Kazuma
Matsunaga, Shunji
Kaito, Takashi
Yamada, Kei
Kobayashi, Sho
Kato, Satoshi
Ohba, Tetsuro
Inami, Satoshi
Fujibayashi, Shunsuke
Katoh, Hiroyuki
Kanno, Haruo
Li, Yuanying
Yatsuya, Hiroshi
Koda, Masao
Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu
Takeshita, Katsushi
Matsumoto, Morio
Yamazaki, Masashi
Okawa, Atsushi
author_facet Nakashima, Hiroaki
Imagama, Shiro
Yoshii, Toshitaka
Egawa, Satoru
Sakai, Kenichiro
Kusano, Kazuo
Nakagawa, Yukihiro
Hirai, Takashi
Wada, Kanichiro
Katsumi, Keiichi
Fujii, Kengo
Kimura, Atsushi
Furuya, Takeo
Kanchiku, Tsukasa
Nagamoto, Yukitaka
Oshima, Yasushi
Nagoshi, Narihito
Ando, Kei
Takahata, Masahiko
Mori, Kanji
Nakajima, Hideaki
Murata, Kazuma
Matsunaga, Shunji
Kaito, Takashi
Yamada, Kei
Kobayashi, Sho
Kato, Satoshi
Ohba, Tetsuro
Inami, Satoshi
Fujibayashi, Shunsuke
Katoh, Hiroyuki
Kanno, Haruo
Li, Yuanying
Yatsuya, Hiroshi
Koda, Masao
Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu
Takeshita, Katsushi
Matsumoto, Morio
Yamazaki, Masashi
Okawa, Atsushi
author_sort Nakashima, Hiroaki
collection PubMed
description This prospective multicenter study, established by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and involving 27 institutions, aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between laminoplasty (LM) and posterior fusion (PF) for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), in order to address the controversy surrounding the role of instrumented fusion in cases of posterior surgical decompression for OPLL. 478 patients were considered for participation in the study; from among them, 189 (137 and 52 patients with LM and PF, respectively) were included and evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, the JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), and radiographical measurements. Basic demographic and radiographical data were reviewed, and the propensity to choose a surgical procedure was calculated. Preoperatively, there were no significant differences among the participants in terms of patient backgrounds, radiographical measurements (K-line or cervical alignment on X-ray, OPLL occupation ratio on computed tomography, increased signal intensity change on magnetic resonance imaging), or clinical status (JOA score and JOACMEQ) after adjustments. The overall risk of perioperative complications was found to be lower with LM (odds ratio [OR] 0.40, p = 0.006), and the rate of C5 palsy occurrence was significantly lower with LM (OR 0.11, p = 0.0002) than with PF. The range of motion (20.91° ± 1.05° and 9.38° ± 1.24°, p < 0.0001) in patients who had PF was significantly smaller than in those who had LM. However, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference among the participants in JOA score, JOA recovery rate, or JOACMEQ improvement at two years. In contrast, OPLL progression was greater in the LM group than in the PF group (OR 2.73, p = 0.0002). Both LM and PF for cervical myelopathy due to OPLL had resulted in comparable postoperative outcomes at 2 years after surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8760337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87603372022-01-18 Comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament Nakashima, Hiroaki Imagama, Shiro Yoshii, Toshitaka Egawa, Satoru Sakai, Kenichiro Kusano, Kazuo Nakagawa, Yukihiro Hirai, Takashi Wada, Kanichiro Katsumi, Keiichi Fujii, Kengo Kimura, Atsushi Furuya, Takeo Kanchiku, Tsukasa Nagamoto, Yukitaka Oshima, Yasushi Nagoshi, Narihito Ando, Kei Takahata, Masahiko Mori, Kanji Nakajima, Hideaki Murata, Kazuma Matsunaga, Shunji Kaito, Takashi Yamada, Kei Kobayashi, Sho Kato, Satoshi Ohba, Tetsuro Inami, Satoshi Fujibayashi, Shunsuke Katoh, Hiroyuki Kanno, Haruo Li, Yuanying Yatsuya, Hiroshi Koda, Masao Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu Takeshita, Katsushi Matsumoto, Morio Yamazaki, Masashi Okawa, Atsushi Sci Rep Article This prospective multicenter study, established by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and involving 27 institutions, aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between laminoplasty (LM) and posterior fusion (PF) for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), in order to address the controversy surrounding the role of instrumented fusion in cases of posterior surgical decompression for OPLL. 478 patients were considered for participation in the study; from among them, 189 (137 and 52 patients with LM and PF, respectively) were included and evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, the JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), and radiographical measurements. Basic demographic and radiographical data were reviewed, and the propensity to choose a surgical procedure was calculated. Preoperatively, there were no significant differences among the participants in terms of patient backgrounds, radiographical measurements (K-line or cervical alignment on X-ray, OPLL occupation ratio on computed tomography, increased signal intensity change on magnetic resonance imaging), or clinical status (JOA score and JOACMEQ) after adjustments. The overall risk of perioperative complications was found to be lower with LM (odds ratio [OR] 0.40, p = 0.006), and the rate of C5 palsy occurrence was significantly lower with LM (OR 0.11, p = 0.0002) than with PF. The range of motion (20.91° ± 1.05° and 9.38° ± 1.24°, p < 0.0001) in patients who had PF was significantly smaller than in those who had LM. However, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference among the participants in JOA score, JOA recovery rate, or JOACMEQ improvement at two years. In contrast, OPLL progression was greater in the LM group than in the PF group (OR 2.73, p = 0.0002). Both LM and PF for cervical myelopathy due to OPLL had resulted in comparable postoperative outcomes at 2 years after surgery. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8760337/ /pubmed/35031694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04727-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Nakashima, Hiroaki
Imagama, Shiro
Yoshii, Toshitaka
Egawa, Satoru
Sakai, Kenichiro
Kusano, Kazuo
Nakagawa, Yukihiro
Hirai, Takashi
Wada, Kanichiro
Katsumi, Keiichi
Fujii, Kengo
Kimura, Atsushi
Furuya, Takeo
Kanchiku, Tsukasa
Nagamoto, Yukitaka
Oshima, Yasushi
Nagoshi, Narihito
Ando, Kei
Takahata, Masahiko
Mori, Kanji
Nakajima, Hideaki
Murata, Kazuma
Matsunaga, Shunji
Kaito, Takashi
Yamada, Kei
Kobayashi, Sho
Kato, Satoshi
Ohba, Tetsuro
Inami, Satoshi
Fujibayashi, Shunsuke
Katoh, Hiroyuki
Kanno, Haruo
Li, Yuanying
Yatsuya, Hiroshi
Koda, Masao
Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu
Takeshita, Katsushi
Matsumoto, Morio
Yamazaki, Masashi
Okawa, Atsushi
Comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament
title Comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament
title_full Comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament
title_fullStr Comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament
title_short Comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament
title_sort comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35031694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04727-1
work_keys_str_mv AT nakashimahiroaki comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT imagamashiro comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT yoshiitoshitaka comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT egawasatoru comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT sakaikenichiro comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT kusanokazuo comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT nakagawayukihiro comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT hiraitakashi comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT wadakanichiro comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT katsumikeiichi comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT fujiikengo comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT kimuraatsushi comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT furuyatakeo comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT kanchikutsukasa comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT nagamotoyukitaka comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT oshimayasushi comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT nagoshinarihito comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT andokei comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT takahatamasahiko comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT morikanji comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT nakajimahideaki comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT muratakazuma comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT matsunagashunji comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT kaitotakashi comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT yamadakei comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT kobayashisho comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT katosatoshi comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT ohbatetsuro comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT inamisatoshi comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT fujibayashishunsuke comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT katohhiroyuki comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT kannoharuo comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT liyuanying comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT yatsuyahiroshi comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT kodamasao comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT kawaguchiyoshiharu comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT takeshitakatsushi comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT matsumotomorio comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT yamazakimasashi comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT okawaatsushi comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament
AT comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament