Cargando…
Comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament
This prospective multicenter study, established by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and involving 27 institutions, aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between laminoplasty (LM) and posterior fusion (PF) for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35031694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04727-1 |
_version_ | 1784633298247483392 |
---|---|
author | Nakashima, Hiroaki Imagama, Shiro Yoshii, Toshitaka Egawa, Satoru Sakai, Kenichiro Kusano, Kazuo Nakagawa, Yukihiro Hirai, Takashi Wada, Kanichiro Katsumi, Keiichi Fujii, Kengo Kimura, Atsushi Furuya, Takeo Kanchiku, Tsukasa Nagamoto, Yukitaka Oshima, Yasushi Nagoshi, Narihito Ando, Kei Takahata, Masahiko Mori, Kanji Nakajima, Hideaki Murata, Kazuma Matsunaga, Shunji Kaito, Takashi Yamada, Kei Kobayashi, Sho Kato, Satoshi Ohba, Tetsuro Inami, Satoshi Fujibayashi, Shunsuke Katoh, Hiroyuki Kanno, Haruo Li, Yuanying Yatsuya, Hiroshi Koda, Masao Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu Takeshita, Katsushi Matsumoto, Morio Yamazaki, Masashi Okawa, Atsushi |
author_facet | Nakashima, Hiroaki Imagama, Shiro Yoshii, Toshitaka Egawa, Satoru Sakai, Kenichiro Kusano, Kazuo Nakagawa, Yukihiro Hirai, Takashi Wada, Kanichiro Katsumi, Keiichi Fujii, Kengo Kimura, Atsushi Furuya, Takeo Kanchiku, Tsukasa Nagamoto, Yukitaka Oshima, Yasushi Nagoshi, Narihito Ando, Kei Takahata, Masahiko Mori, Kanji Nakajima, Hideaki Murata, Kazuma Matsunaga, Shunji Kaito, Takashi Yamada, Kei Kobayashi, Sho Kato, Satoshi Ohba, Tetsuro Inami, Satoshi Fujibayashi, Shunsuke Katoh, Hiroyuki Kanno, Haruo Li, Yuanying Yatsuya, Hiroshi Koda, Masao Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu Takeshita, Katsushi Matsumoto, Morio Yamazaki, Masashi Okawa, Atsushi |
author_sort | Nakashima, Hiroaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | This prospective multicenter study, established by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and involving 27 institutions, aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between laminoplasty (LM) and posterior fusion (PF) for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), in order to address the controversy surrounding the role of instrumented fusion in cases of posterior surgical decompression for OPLL. 478 patients were considered for participation in the study; from among them, 189 (137 and 52 patients with LM and PF, respectively) were included and evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, the JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), and radiographical measurements. Basic demographic and radiographical data were reviewed, and the propensity to choose a surgical procedure was calculated. Preoperatively, there were no significant differences among the participants in terms of patient backgrounds, radiographical measurements (K-line or cervical alignment on X-ray, OPLL occupation ratio on computed tomography, increased signal intensity change on magnetic resonance imaging), or clinical status (JOA score and JOACMEQ) after adjustments. The overall risk of perioperative complications was found to be lower with LM (odds ratio [OR] 0.40, p = 0.006), and the rate of C5 palsy occurrence was significantly lower with LM (OR 0.11, p = 0.0002) than with PF. The range of motion (20.91° ± 1.05° and 9.38° ± 1.24°, p < 0.0001) in patients who had PF was significantly smaller than in those who had LM. However, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference among the participants in JOA score, JOA recovery rate, or JOACMEQ improvement at two years. In contrast, OPLL progression was greater in the LM group than in the PF group (OR 2.73, p = 0.0002). Both LM and PF for cervical myelopathy due to OPLL had resulted in comparable postoperative outcomes at 2 years after surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8760337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87603372022-01-18 Comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament Nakashima, Hiroaki Imagama, Shiro Yoshii, Toshitaka Egawa, Satoru Sakai, Kenichiro Kusano, Kazuo Nakagawa, Yukihiro Hirai, Takashi Wada, Kanichiro Katsumi, Keiichi Fujii, Kengo Kimura, Atsushi Furuya, Takeo Kanchiku, Tsukasa Nagamoto, Yukitaka Oshima, Yasushi Nagoshi, Narihito Ando, Kei Takahata, Masahiko Mori, Kanji Nakajima, Hideaki Murata, Kazuma Matsunaga, Shunji Kaito, Takashi Yamada, Kei Kobayashi, Sho Kato, Satoshi Ohba, Tetsuro Inami, Satoshi Fujibayashi, Shunsuke Katoh, Hiroyuki Kanno, Haruo Li, Yuanying Yatsuya, Hiroshi Koda, Masao Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu Takeshita, Katsushi Matsumoto, Morio Yamazaki, Masashi Okawa, Atsushi Sci Rep Article This prospective multicenter study, established by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and involving 27 institutions, aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between laminoplasty (LM) and posterior fusion (PF) for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), in order to address the controversy surrounding the role of instrumented fusion in cases of posterior surgical decompression for OPLL. 478 patients were considered for participation in the study; from among them, 189 (137 and 52 patients with LM and PF, respectively) were included and evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, the JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), and radiographical measurements. Basic demographic and radiographical data were reviewed, and the propensity to choose a surgical procedure was calculated. Preoperatively, there were no significant differences among the participants in terms of patient backgrounds, radiographical measurements (K-line or cervical alignment on X-ray, OPLL occupation ratio on computed tomography, increased signal intensity change on magnetic resonance imaging), or clinical status (JOA score and JOACMEQ) after adjustments. The overall risk of perioperative complications was found to be lower with LM (odds ratio [OR] 0.40, p = 0.006), and the rate of C5 palsy occurrence was significantly lower with LM (OR 0.11, p = 0.0002) than with PF. The range of motion (20.91° ± 1.05° and 9.38° ± 1.24°, p < 0.0001) in patients who had PF was significantly smaller than in those who had LM. However, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference among the participants in JOA score, JOA recovery rate, or JOACMEQ improvement at two years. In contrast, OPLL progression was greater in the LM group than in the PF group (OR 2.73, p = 0.0002). Both LM and PF for cervical myelopathy due to OPLL had resulted in comparable postoperative outcomes at 2 years after surgery. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8760337/ /pubmed/35031694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04727-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Nakashima, Hiroaki Imagama, Shiro Yoshii, Toshitaka Egawa, Satoru Sakai, Kenichiro Kusano, Kazuo Nakagawa, Yukihiro Hirai, Takashi Wada, Kanichiro Katsumi, Keiichi Fujii, Kengo Kimura, Atsushi Furuya, Takeo Kanchiku, Tsukasa Nagamoto, Yukitaka Oshima, Yasushi Nagoshi, Narihito Ando, Kei Takahata, Masahiko Mori, Kanji Nakajima, Hideaki Murata, Kazuma Matsunaga, Shunji Kaito, Takashi Yamada, Kei Kobayashi, Sho Kato, Satoshi Ohba, Tetsuro Inami, Satoshi Fujibayashi, Shunsuke Katoh, Hiroyuki Kanno, Haruo Li, Yuanying Yatsuya, Hiroshi Koda, Masao Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu Takeshita, Katsushi Matsumoto, Morio Yamazaki, Masashi Okawa, Atsushi Comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament |
title | Comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament |
title_full | Comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament |
title_fullStr | Comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament |
title_short | Comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament |
title_sort | comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35031694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04727-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakashimahiroaki comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT imagamashiro comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT yoshiitoshitaka comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT egawasatoru comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT sakaikenichiro comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT kusanokazuo comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT nakagawayukihiro comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT hiraitakashi comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT wadakanichiro comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT katsumikeiichi comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT fujiikengo comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT kimuraatsushi comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT furuyatakeo comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT kanchikutsukasa comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT nagamotoyukitaka comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT oshimayasushi comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT nagoshinarihito comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT andokei comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT takahatamasahiko comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT morikanji comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT nakajimahideaki comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT muratakazuma comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT matsunagashunji comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT kaitotakashi comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT yamadakei comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT kobayashisho comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT katosatoshi comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT ohbatetsuro comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT inamisatoshi comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT fujibayashishunsuke comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT katohhiroyuki comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT kannoharuo comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT liyuanying comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT yatsuyahiroshi comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT kodamasao comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT kawaguchiyoshiharu comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT takeshitakatsushi comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT matsumotomorio comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT yamazakimasashi comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT okawaatsushi comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament AT comparisonoflaminoplastyandposteriorfusionsurgeryforcervicalossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligament |