Cargando…

Agreement on grading of normal clivus using magnetic resonance imaging among radiologists

PURPOSE: The present study was aimed to evaluate the agreement on grading normal clivus on MRI among radiologists. METHODS: A retrospective study included patients who underwent MRI brain during January 1, 2015 to October 31, 2019. Two hundred forty-four patients who had no marrow pathology on MRI w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tinnut, Sujitra, Galassi, Waneerat, Oilmungmool, Nongluk, Chattrapiban, Thanin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35059474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2022.100395
_version_ 1784633345377828864
author Tinnut, Sujitra
Galassi, Waneerat
Oilmungmool, Nongluk
Chattrapiban, Thanin
author_facet Tinnut, Sujitra
Galassi, Waneerat
Oilmungmool, Nongluk
Chattrapiban, Thanin
author_sort Tinnut, Sujitra
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The present study was aimed to evaluate the agreement on grading normal clivus on MRI among radiologists. METHODS: A retrospective study included patients who underwent MRI brain during January 1, 2015 to October 31, 2019. Two hundred forty-four patients who had no marrow pathology on MRI were included and divided into 8 age groups by decades. Three radiologists independently reviewed the signal intensity of clivus in mid sagittal T1-weighted image. The signal intensity was classified into three grades (Grade I-III). Fleiss’ kappa coefficients (k) were calculated to assess interrater agreement. RESULTS: Of 244 patients, there were 123 (50.4%) males and 121 (49.6%) females. Age ranged from 1 to 79 years old. Clivus Grade II was more frequently reported (> 50%) by radiologists. The agreement (kappa) among all three radiologists on evaluation of clivus irrespective of the grading equals to 0.67 (95%CI: 0.60–0.74). In stratified analyses by the grade of clivus, the kappa values for Grade I to III and were 0.73, 0.62, and 0.69 respectively. CONCLUSION: Interrater agreement of MRI evaluation of normal clivus among radiologists was good. The visual grading criteria to classify the clivus is sufficient to distinguish the marrow maturation. However, the consensus reading should be made whenever normal clivus Grade II is read.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8760553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87605532022-01-19 Agreement on grading of normal clivus using magnetic resonance imaging among radiologists Tinnut, Sujitra Galassi, Waneerat Oilmungmool, Nongluk Chattrapiban, Thanin Eur J Radiol Open Original Article PURPOSE: The present study was aimed to evaluate the agreement on grading normal clivus on MRI among radiologists. METHODS: A retrospective study included patients who underwent MRI brain during January 1, 2015 to October 31, 2019. Two hundred forty-four patients who had no marrow pathology on MRI were included and divided into 8 age groups by decades. Three radiologists independently reviewed the signal intensity of clivus in mid sagittal T1-weighted image. The signal intensity was classified into three grades (Grade I-III). Fleiss’ kappa coefficients (k) were calculated to assess interrater agreement. RESULTS: Of 244 patients, there were 123 (50.4%) males and 121 (49.6%) females. Age ranged from 1 to 79 years old. Clivus Grade II was more frequently reported (> 50%) by radiologists. The agreement (kappa) among all three radiologists on evaluation of clivus irrespective of the grading equals to 0.67 (95%CI: 0.60–0.74). In stratified analyses by the grade of clivus, the kappa values for Grade I to III and were 0.73, 0.62, and 0.69 respectively. CONCLUSION: Interrater agreement of MRI evaluation of normal clivus among radiologists was good. The visual grading criteria to classify the clivus is sufficient to distinguish the marrow maturation. However, the consensus reading should be made whenever normal clivus Grade II is read. Elsevier 2022-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8760553/ /pubmed/35059474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2022.100395 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Tinnut, Sujitra
Galassi, Waneerat
Oilmungmool, Nongluk
Chattrapiban, Thanin
Agreement on grading of normal clivus using magnetic resonance imaging among radiologists
title Agreement on grading of normal clivus using magnetic resonance imaging among radiologists
title_full Agreement on grading of normal clivus using magnetic resonance imaging among radiologists
title_fullStr Agreement on grading of normal clivus using magnetic resonance imaging among radiologists
title_full_unstemmed Agreement on grading of normal clivus using magnetic resonance imaging among radiologists
title_short Agreement on grading of normal clivus using magnetic resonance imaging among radiologists
title_sort agreement on grading of normal clivus using magnetic resonance imaging among radiologists
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35059474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2022.100395
work_keys_str_mv AT tinnutsujitra agreementongradingofnormalclivususingmagneticresonanceimagingamongradiologists
AT galassiwaneerat agreementongradingofnormalclivususingmagneticresonanceimagingamongradiologists
AT oilmungmoolnongluk agreementongradingofnormalclivususingmagneticresonanceimagingamongradiologists
AT chattrapibanthanin agreementongradingofnormalclivususingmagneticresonanceimagingamongradiologists