Cargando…
Implementing healthy food environment policies in New Zealand: nine years of inaction
BACKGROUND: The INFORMAS [International Network for Food and Obesity/Non-communicable Diseases (NCDs) Research, Monitoring and Action Support] Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) was developed to evaluate the degree of implementation of widely recommended food environment policies by na...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35033119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00809-8 |
_version_ | 1784633350617563136 |
---|---|
author | Mackay, Sally Gerritsen, Sarah Sing, Fiona Vandevijvere, Stefanie Swinburn, Boyd |
author_facet | Mackay, Sally Gerritsen, Sarah Sing, Fiona Vandevijvere, Stefanie Swinburn, Boyd |
author_sort | Mackay, Sally |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The INFORMAS [International Network for Food and Obesity/Non-communicable Diseases (NCDs) Research, Monitoring and Action Support] Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) was developed to evaluate the degree of implementation of widely recommended food environment policies by national governments against international best practice, and has been applied in New Zealand in 2014, 2017 and 2020. This paper outlines the 2020 Food-EPI process and compares policy implementation and recommendations with the 2014 and 2017 Food-EPI. METHODS: In March–April 2020, a national panel of over 50 public health experts participated in Food-EPI. Experts rated the extent of implementation of 47 “good practice” policy and infrastructure support indicators compared to international best practice, using an extensive evidence document verified by government officials. Experts then proposed and prioritized concrete actions needed to address the critical implementation gaps identified. Progress on policy implementation and recommendations made over the three Food-EPIs was compared. RESULTS: In 2020, 60% of the indicators were rated as having “low” or “very little, if any” implementation compared to international benchmarks: less progress than 2017 (47%) and similar to 2014 (61%). Of the nine priority actions proposed in 2014, there was only noticeable action on one (Health Star Ratings). The majority of actions were therefore proposed again in 2017 and 2020. In 2020 the proposed actions were broader, reflecting the need for multisectoral action to improve the food environment, and the need for a mandatory approach in all policy areas. CONCLUSIONS: There has been little to no progress in the past three terms of government (9 years) on the implementation of policies and infrastructure support for healthy food environments, with implementation overall regressing between 2017 and 2020. The proposed actions in 2020 have reflected a growing movement to locate nutrition within the wider context of planetary health and with recognition of the social determinants of health and nutrition, resulting in recommendations that will require the involvement of many government entities to overcome the existing policy inertia. The increase in food insecurity due to COVID-19 lockdowns may provide the impetus to stimulate action on food polices. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-021-00809-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8760574 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87605742022-01-18 Implementing healthy food environment policies in New Zealand: nine years of inaction Mackay, Sally Gerritsen, Sarah Sing, Fiona Vandevijvere, Stefanie Swinburn, Boyd Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: The INFORMAS [International Network for Food and Obesity/Non-communicable Diseases (NCDs) Research, Monitoring and Action Support] Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) was developed to evaluate the degree of implementation of widely recommended food environment policies by national governments against international best practice, and has been applied in New Zealand in 2014, 2017 and 2020. This paper outlines the 2020 Food-EPI process and compares policy implementation and recommendations with the 2014 and 2017 Food-EPI. METHODS: In March–April 2020, a national panel of over 50 public health experts participated in Food-EPI. Experts rated the extent of implementation of 47 “good practice” policy and infrastructure support indicators compared to international best practice, using an extensive evidence document verified by government officials. Experts then proposed and prioritized concrete actions needed to address the critical implementation gaps identified. Progress on policy implementation and recommendations made over the three Food-EPIs was compared. RESULTS: In 2020, 60% of the indicators were rated as having “low” or “very little, if any” implementation compared to international benchmarks: less progress than 2017 (47%) and similar to 2014 (61%). Of the nine priority actions proposed in 2014, there was only noticeable action on one (Health Star Ratings). The majority of actions were therefore proposed again in 2017 and 2020. In 2020 the proposed actions were broader, reflecting the need for multisectoral action to improve the food environment, and the need for a mandatory approach in all policy areas. CONCLUSIONS: There has been little to no progress in the past three terms of government (9 years) on the implementation of policies and infrastructure support for healthy food environments, with implementation overall regressing between 2017 and 2020. The proposed actions in 2020 have reflected a growing movement to locate nutrition within the wider context of planetary health and with recognition of the social determinants of health and nutrition, resulting in recommendations that will require the involvement of many government entities to overcome the existing policy inertia. The increase in food insecurity due to COVID-19 lockdowns may provide the impetus to stimulate action on food polices. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-021-00809-8. BioMed Central 2022-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8760574/ /pubmed/35033119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00809-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Mackay, Sally Gerritsen, Sarah Sing, Fiona Vandevijvere, Stefanie Swinburn, Boyd Implementing healthy food environment policies in New Zealand: nine years of inaction |
title | Implementing healthy food environment policies in New Zealand: nine years of inaction |
title_full | Implementing healthy food environment policies in New Zealand: nine years of inaction |
title_fullStr | Implementing healthy food environment policies in New Zealand: nine years of inaction |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementing healthy food environment policies in New Zealand: nine years of inaction |
title_short | Implementing healthy food environment policies in New Zealand: nine years of inaction |
title_sort | implementing healthy food environment policies in new zealand: nine years of inaction |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35033119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00809-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mackaysally implementinghealthyfoodenvironmentpoliciesinnewzealandnineyearsofinaction AT gerritsensarah implementinghealthyfoodenvironmentpoliciesinnewzealandnineyearsofinaction AT singfiona implementinghealthyfoodenvironmentpoliciesinnewzealandnineyearsofinaction AT vandevijverestefanie implementinghealthyfoodenvironmentpoliciesinnewzealandnineyearsofinaction AT swinburnboyd implementinghealthyfoodenvironmentpoliciesinnewzealandnineyearsofinaction |