Cargando…
Do pharmacy practice standards effectively describe behaviour? Reviewing practice standards using a behavioural specificity framework
BACKGROUND: Guidelines and practice standards exist to communicate the conduct and behaviour expected of health care professionals and ensure consistent quality practice. It is important that they describe behaviours explicitly so they can be interpreted, enacted and measured with ease. The AACTT fr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35031027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07358-4 |
_version_ | 1784633381351325696 |
---|---|
author | Mill, Deanna Page, Amy Johnson, Jacinta Lee, Kenneth Salter, Sandra M. Seubert, Liza Clifford, Rhonda D’Lima, Danielle |
author_facet | Mill, Deanna Page, Amy Johnson, Jacinta Lee, Kenneth Salter, Sandra M. Seubert, Liza Clifford, Rhonda D’Lima, Danielle |
author_sort | Mill, Deanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Guidelines and practice standards exist to communicate the conduct and behaviour expected of health care professionals and ensure consistent quality practice. It is important that they describe behaviours explicitly so they can be interpreted, enacted and measured with ease. The AACTT framework specifies behaviour in terms of the: Action to be performed, Actor who performs the action, Context where the action occurs, Target who the action is performed with/for and Time when the action is performed (AACTT). It provides the most up to date framework for specifying behaviours and is particularly relevant to complex behavioural problems that involve sequences of behaviours performed by different people. Behavioural specificity within pharmacy practice standards has not been explored. AIM: To determine if behaviours described in the Professional Practice Standards for Australian Pharmacists specify Action, Actor, Context, Target and Time. METHODS: Two researchers independently reviewed the scope and structure of the practice standards and one extracted action statements (behaviours) verbatim. Through an iterative process, the researchers modified and developed the existing AACTT definitions to operationalise them for application to review of the action statements in the practice standards. The operational definitions, decision criteria and curated examples were combined in a codebook. The definitions were consistently applied through a directed content analysis approach to evaluate all extracted action statements by one researcher. For consistency 20% was independently checked for agreement by a second researcher. RESULTS: A novel codebook to apply AACTT criteria to evaluate practice standards was developed. Application of this codebook identified 768 independent behaviours. Of these, 300 (39%) described at least one discrete observable action, none specified an actor, 25 (3%) specified context, 131 (17%) specified target and 88 (11%) specified time. CONCLUSION(S): The behaviours detailed in practice standards for Australian pharmacists do not consistently specify behaviours in terms of Action, Actor, Context, Target and Time. Developers in the pharmacy profession, and beyond, should consider the behavioural specificity of their documents to improve interpretability, usability and adherence to the behaviours detailed. This also has implications for the development and evaluation of interventions to change such behaviours and improve quality of care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8760715 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87607152022-01-18 Do pharmacy practice standards effectively describe behaviour? Reviewing practice standards using a behavioural specificity framework Mill, Deanna Page, Amy Johnson, Jacinta Lee, Kenneth Salter, Sandra M. Seubert, Liza Clifford, Rhonda D’Lima, Danielle BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Guidelines and practice standards exist to communicate the conduct and behaviour expected of health care professionals and ensure consistent quality practice. It is important that they describe behaviours explicitly so they can be interpreted, enacted and measured with ease. The AACTT framework specifies behaviour in terms of the: Action to be performed, Actor who performs the action, Context where the action occurs, Target who the action is performed with/for and Time when the action is performed (AACTT). It provides the most up to date framework for specifying behaviours and is particularly relevant to complex behavioural problems that involve sequences of behaviours performed by different people. Behavioural specificity within pharmacy practice standards has not been explored. AIM: To determine if behaviours described in the Professional Practice Standards for Australian Pharmacists specify Action, Actor, Context, Target and Time. METHODS: Two researchers independently reviewed the scope and structure of the practice standards and one extracted action statements (behaviours) verbatim. Through an iterative process, the researchers modified and developed the existing AACTT definitions to operationalise them for application to review of the action statements in the practice standards. The operational definitions, decision criteria and curated examples were combined in a codebook. The definitions were consistently applied through a directed content analysis approach to evaluate all extracted action statements by one researcher. For consistency 20% was independently checked for agreement by a second researcher. RESULTS: A novel codebook to apply AACTT criteria to evaluate practice standards was developed. Application of this codebook identified 768 independent behaviours. Of these, 300 (39%) described at least one discrete observable action, none specified an actor, 25 (3%) specified context, 131 (17%) specified target and 88 (11%) specified time. CONCLUSION(S): The behaviours detailed in practice standards for Australian pharmacists do not consistently specify behaviours in terms of Action, Actor, Context, Target and Time. Developers in the pharmacy profession, and beyond, should consider the behavioural specificity of their documents to improve interpretability, usability and adherence to the behaviours detailed. This also has implications for the development and evaluation of interventions to change such behaviours and improve quality of care. BioMed Central 2022-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8760715/ /pubmed/35031027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07358-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Mill, Deanna Page, Amy Johnson, Jacinta Lee, Kenneth Salter, Sandra M. Seubert, Liza Clifford, Rhonda D’Lima, Danielle Do pharmacy practice standards effectively describe behaviour? Reviewing practice standards using a behavioural specificity framework |
title | Do pharmacy practice standards effectively describe behaviour? Reviewing practice standards using a behavioural specificity framework |
title_full | Do pharmacy practice standards effectively describe behaviour? Reviewing practice standards using a behavioural specificity framework |
title_fullStr | Do pharmacy practice standards effectively describe behaviour? Reviewing practice standards using a behavioural specificity framework |
title_full_unstemmed | Do pharmacy practice standards effectively describe behaviour? Reviewing practice standards using a behavioural specificity framework |
title_short | Do pharmacy practice standards effectively describe behaviour? Reviewing practice standards using a behavioural specificity framework |
title_sort | do pharmacy practice standards effectively describe behaviour? reviewing practice standards using a behavioural specificity framework |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35031027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07358-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT milldeanna dopharmacypracticestandardseffectivelydescribebehaviourreviewingpracticestandardsusingabehaviouralspecificityframework AT pageamy dopharmacypracticestandardseffectivelydescribebehaviourreviewingpracticestandardsusingabehaviouralspecificityframework AT johnsonjacinta dopharmacypracticestandardseffectivelydescribebehaviourreviewingpracticestandardsusingabehaviouralspecificityframework AT leekenneth dopharmacypracticestandardseffectivelydescribebehaviourreviewingpracticestandardsusingabehaviouralspecificityframework AT saltersandram dopharmacypracticestandardseffectivelydescribebehaviourreviewingpracticestandardsusingabehaviouralspecificityframework AT seubertliza dopharmacypracticestandardseffectivelydescribebehaviourreviewingpracticestandardsusingabehaviouralspecificityframework AT cliffordrhonda dopharmacypracticestandardseffectivelydescribebehaviourreviewingpracticestandardsusingabehaviouralspecificityframework AT dlimadanielle dopharmacypracticestandardseffectivelydescribebehaviourreviewingpracticestandardsusingabehaviouralspecificityframework |