Cargando…

Do pharmacy practice standards effectively describe behaviour? Reviewing practice standards using a behavioural specificity framework

BACKGROUND: Guidelines and practice standards exist to communicate the conduct and behaviour expected of health care professionals and ensure consistent quality practice. It is important that they describe behaviours explicitly so they can be interpreted, enacted and measured with ease. The AACTT fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mill, Deanna, Page, Amy, Johnson, Jacinta, Lee, Kenneth, Salter, Sandra M., Seubert, Liza, Clifford, Rhonda, D’Lima, Danielle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35031027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07358-4
_version_ 1784633381351325696
author Mill, Deanna
Page, Amy
Johnson, Jacinta
Lee, Kenneth
Salter, Sandra M.
Seubert, Liza
Clifford, Rhonda
D’Lima, Danielle
author_facet Mill, Deanna
Page, Amy
Johnson, Jacinta
Lee, Kenneth
Salter, Sandra M.
Seubert, Liza
Clifford, Rhonda
D’Lima, Danielle
author_sort Mill, Deanna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Guidelines and practice standards exist to communicate the conduct and behaviour expected of health care professionals and ensure consistent quality practice. It is important that they describe behaviours explicitly so they can be interpreted, enacted and measured with ease. The AACTT framework specifies behaviour in terms of the: Action to be performed, Actor who performs the action, Context where the action occurs, Target who the action is performed with/for and Time when the action is performed (AACTT). It provides the most up to date framework for specifying behaviours and is particularly relevant to complex behavioural problems that involve sequences of behaviours performed by different people. Behavioural specificity within pharmacy practice standards has not been explored. AIM: To determine if behaviours described in the Professional Practice Standards for Australian Pharmacists specify Action, Actor, Context, Target and Time. METHODS: Two researchers independently reviewed the scope and structure of the practice standards and one extracted action statements (behaviours) verbatim. Through an iterative process, the researchers modified and developed the existing AACTT definitions to operationalise them for application to review of the action statements in the practice standards. The operational definitions, decision criteria and curated examples were combined in a codebook. The definitions were consistently applied through a directed content analysis approach to evaluate all extracted action statements by one researcher. For consistency 20% was independently checked for agreement by a second researcher. RESULTS: A novel codebook to apply AACTT criteria to evaluate practice standards was developed. Application of this codebook identified 768 independent behaviours. Of these, 300 (39%) described at least one discrete observable action, none specified an actor, 25 (3%) specified context, 131 (17%) specified target and 88 (11%) specified time. CONCLUSION(S): The behaviours detailed in practice standards for Australian pharmacists do not consistently specify behaviours in terms of Action, Actor, Context, Target and Time. Developers in the pharmacy profession, and beyond, should consider the behavioural specificity of their documents to improve interpretability, usability and adherence to the behaviours detailed. This also has implications for the development and evaluation of interventions to change such behaviours and improve quality of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8760715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87607152022-01-18 Do pharmacy practice standards effectively describe behaviour? Reviewing practice standards using a behavioural specificity framework Mill, Deanna Page, Amy Johnson, Jacinta Lee, Kenneth Salter, Sandra M. Seubert, Liza Clifford, Rhonda D’Lima, Danielle BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Guidelines and practice standards exist to communicate the conduct and behaviour expected of health care professionals and ensure consistent quality practice. It is important that they describe behaviours explicitly so they can be interpreted, enacted and measured with ease. The AACTT framework specifies behaviour in terms of the: Action to be performed, Actor who performs the action, Context where the action occurs, Target who the action is performed with/for and Time when the action is performed (AACTT). It provides the most up to date framework for specifying behaviours and is particularly relevant to complex behavioural problems that involve sequences of behaviours performed by different people. Behavioural specificity within pharmacy practice standards has not been explored. AIM: To determine if behaviours described in the Professional Practice Standards for Australian Pharmacists specify Action, Actor, Context, Target and Time. METHODS: Two researchers independently reviewed the scope and structure of the practice standards and one extracted action statements (behaviours) verbatim. Through an iterative process, the researchers modified and developed the existing AACTT definitions to operationalise them for application to review of the action statements in the practice standards. The operational definitions, decision criteria and curated examples were combined in a codebook. The definitions were consistently applied through a directed content analysis approach to evaluate all extracted action statements by one researcher. For consistency 20% was independently checked for agreement by a second researcher. RESULTS: A novel codebook to apply AACTT criteria to evaluate practice standards was developed. Application of this codebook identified 768 independent behaviours. Of these, 300 (39%) described at least one discrete observable action, none specified an actor, 25 (3%) specified context, 131 (17%) specified target and 88 (11%) specified time. CONCLUSION(S): The behaviours detailed in practice standards for Australian pharmacists do not consistently specify behaviours in terms of Action, Actor, Context, Target and Time. Developers in the pharmacy profession, and beyond, should consider the behavioural specificity of their documents to improve interpretability, usability and adherence to the behaviours detailed. This also has implications for the development and evaluation of interventions to change such behaviours and improve quality of care. BioMed Central 2022-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8760715/ /pubmed/35031027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07358-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mill, Deanna
Page, Amy
Johnson, Jacinta
Lee, Kenneth
Salter, Sandra M.
Seubert, Liza
Clifford, Rhonda
D’Lima, Danielle
Do pharmacy practice standards effectively describe behaviour? Reviewing practice standards using a behavioural specificity framework
title Do pharmacy practice standards effectively describe behaviour? Reviewing practice standards using a behavioural specificity framework
title_full Do pharmacy practice standards effectively describe behaviour? Reviewing practice standards using a behavioural specificity framework
title_fullStr Do pharmacy practice standards effectively describe behaviour? Reviewing practice standards using a behavioural specificity framework
title_full_unstemmed Do pharmacy practice standards effectively describe behaviour? Reviewing practice standards using a behavioural specificity framework
title_short Do pharmacy practice standards effectively describe behaviour? Reviewing practice standards using a behavioural specificity framework
title_sort do pharmacy practice standards effectively describe behaviour? reviewing practice standards using a behavioural specificity framework
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35031027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07358-4
work_keys_str_mv AT milldeanna dopharmacypracticestandardseffectivelydescribebehaviourreviewingpracticestandardsusingabehaviouralspecificityframework
AT pageamy dopharmacypracticestandardseffectivelydescribebehaviourreviewingpracticestandardsusingabehaviouralspecificityframework
AT johnsonjacinta dopharmacypracticestandardseffectivelydescribebehaviourreviewingpracticestandardsusingabehaviouralspecificityframework
AT leekenneth dopharmacypracticestandardseffectivelydescribebehaviourreviewingpracticestandardsusingabehaviouralspecificityframework
AT saltersandram dopharmacypracticestandardseffectivelydescribebehaviourreviewingpracticestandardsusingabehaviouralspecificityframework
AT seubertliza dopharmacypracticestandardseffectivelydescribebehaviourreviewingpracticestandardsusingabehaviouralspecificityframework
AT cliffordrhonda dopharmacypracticestandardseffectivelydescribebehaviourreviewingpracticestandardsusingabehaviouralspecificityframework
AT dlimadanielle dopharmacypracticestandardseffectivelydescribebehaviourreviewingpracticestandardsusingabehaviouralspecificityframework