Cargando…
MR-guided SBRT boost for patients with locally advanced or recurrent gynecological cancers ineligible for brachytherapy: feasibility and early clinical experience
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by a brachytherapy (BT) boost is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced or recurrent gynecological cancer (LARGC). However, not every patient is suitable for BT. Therefore, we investigated the feasibility of an MR-guided SBRT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35033132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-01981-z |
_version_ | 1784633396518977536 |
---|---|
author | Hadi, Indrawati Eze, Chukwuka Schönecker, Stephan von Bestenbostel, Rieke Rogowski, Paul Nierer, Lukas Bodensohn, Raphael Reiner, Michael Landry, Guillaume Belka, Claus Niyazi, Maximilian Corradini, Stefanie |
author_facet | Hadi, Indrawati Eze, Chukwuka Schönecker, Stephan von Bestenbostel, Rieke Rogowski, Paul Nierer, Lukas Bodensohn, Raphael Reiner, Michael Landry, Guillaume Belka, Claus Niyazi, Maximilian Corradini, Stefanie |
author_sort | Hadi, Indrawati |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by a brachytherapy (BT) boost is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced or recurrent gynecological cancer (LARGC). However, not every patient is suitable for BT. Therefore, we investigated the feasibility of an MR-guided SBRT boost (MRg-SBRT boost) following CRT of the pelvis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients with LARGC were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were not suitable for BT due to extensive infiltration of the pelvic wall (10%), other adjacent organs (30%), or both (50%), or ineligibility for anesthesia (10%). Online-adaptive treatment planning was performed to control for interfractional anatomical changes. Treatment parameters and toxicity were evaluated to assess the feasibility of MRg-SBRT boost. RESULTS: MRg-SBRT boost was delivered to a median total dose of 21.0 Gy in 4 fractions. The median optimized PTV (PTV(opt)) size was 43.5ccm. The median cumulative dose of 73.6Gy(10) was delivered to PTV(opt). The cumulative median D2ccm of the rectum was 63.7 Gy; bladder 72.2 Gy; sigmoid 65.8 Gy; bowel 59.9 Gy (EQD2(3)). The median overall treatment time/fraction was 77 min, including the adaptive workflow in 100% of fractions. The median duration of the entire treatment was 50 days. After a median follow-up of 9 months, we observed no CTCAE ≥ °II toxicities. CONCLUSION: These early results report the feasibility of an MRg-SBRT boost approach in patients with LARGC, who were not candidates for BT. When classical BT-OAR constraints are followed, the therapy was well tolerated. Long-term follow-up is needed to validate the results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8760788 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87607882022-01-18 MR-guided SBRT boost for patients with locally advanced or recurrent gynecological cancers ineligible for brachytherapy: feasibility and early clinical experience Hadi, Indrawati Eze, Chukwuka Schönecker, Stephan von Bestenbostel, Rieke Rogowski, Paul Nierer, Lukas Bodensohn, Raphael Reiner, Michael Landry, Guillaume Belka, Claus Niyazi, Maximilian Corradini, Stefanie Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by a brachytherapy (BT) boost is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced or recurrent gynecological cancer (LARGC). However, not every patient is suitable for BT. Therefore, we investigated the feasibility of an MR-guided SBRT boost (MRg-SBRT boost) following CRT of the pelvis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients with LARGC were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were not suitable for BT due to extensive infiltration of the pelvic wall (10%), other adjacent organs (30%), or both (50%), or ineligibility for anesthesia (10%). Online-adaptive treatment planning was performed to control for interfractional anatomical changes. Treatment parameters and toxicity were evaluated to assess the feasibility of MRg-SBRT boost. RESULTS: MRg-SBRT boost was delivered to a median total dose of 21.0 Gy in 4 fractions. The median optimized PTV (PTV(opt)) size was 43.5ccm. The median cumulative dose of 73.6Gy(10) was delivered to PTV(opt). The cumulative median D2ccm of the rectum was 63.7 Gy; bladder 72.2 Gy; sigmoid 65.8 Gy; bowel 59.9 Gy (EQD2(3)). The median overall treatment time/fraction was 77 min, including the adaptive workflow in 100% of fractions. The median duration of the entire treatment was 50 days. After a median follow-up of 9 months, we observed no CTCAE ≥ °II toxicities. CONCLUSION: These early results report the feasibility of an MRg-SBRT boost approach in patients with LARGC, who were not candidates for BT. When classical BT-OAR constraints are followed, the therapy was well tolerated. Long-term follow-up is needed to validate the results. BioMed Central 2022-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8760788/ /pubmed/35033132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-01981-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Hadi, Indrawati Eze, Chukwuka Schönecker, Stephan von Bestenbostel, Rieke Rogowski, Paul Nierer, Lukas Bodensohn, Raphael Reiner, Michael Landry, Guillaume Belka, Claus Niyazi, Maximilian Corradini, Stefanie MR-guided SBRT boost for patients with locally advanced or recurrent gynecological cancers ineligible for brachytherapy: feasibility and early clinical experience |
title | MR-guided SBRT boost for patients with locally advanced or recurrent gynecological cancers ineligible for brachytherapy: feasibility and early clinical experience |
title_full | MR-guided SBRT boost for patients with locally advanced or recurrent gynecological cancers ineligible for brachytherapy: feasibility and early clinical experience |
title_fullStr | MR-guided SBRT boost for patients with locally advanced or recurrent gynecological cancers ineligible for brachytherapy: feasibility and early clinical experience |
title_full_unstemmed | MR-guided SBRT boost for patients with locally advanced or recurrent gynecological cancers ineligible for brachytherapy: feasibility and early clinical experience |
title_short | MR-guided SBRT boost for patients with locally advanced or recurrent gynecological cancers ineligible for brachytherapy: feasibility and early clinical experience |
title_sort | mr-guided sbrt boost for patients with locally advanced or recurrent gynecological cancers ineligible for brachytherapy: feasibility and early clinical experience |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35033132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-01981-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hadiindrawati mrguidedsbrtboostforpatientswithlocallyadvancedorrecurrentgynecologicalcancersineligibleforbrachytherapyfeasibilityandearlyclinicalexperience AT ezechukwuka mrguidedsbrtboostforpatientswithlocallyadvancedorrecurrentgynecologicalcancersineligibleforbrachytherapyfeasibilityandearlyclinicalexperience AT schoneckerstephan mrguidedsbrtboostforpatientswithlocallyadvancedorrecurrentgynecologicalcancersineligibleforbrachytherapyfeasibilityandearlyclinicalexperience AT vonbestenbostelrieke mrguidedsbrtboostforpatientswithlocallyadvancedorrecurrentgynecologicalcancersineligibleforbrachytherapyfeasibilityandearlyclinicalexperience AT rogowskipaul mrguidedsbrtboostforpatientswithlocallyadvancedorrecurrentgynecologicalcancersineligibleforbrachytherapyfeasibilityandearlyclinicalexperience AT niererlukas mrguidedsbrtboostforpatientswithlocallyadvancedorrecurrentgynecologicalcancersineligibleforbrachytherapyfeasibilityandearlyclinicalexperience AT bodensohnraphael mrguidedsbrtboostforpatientswithlocallyadvancedorrecurrentgynecologicalcancersineligibleforbrachytherapyfeasibilityandearlyclinicalexperience AT reinermichael mrguidedsbrtboostforpatientswithlocallyadvancedorrecurrentgynecologicalcancersineligibleforbrachytherapyfeasibilityandearlyclinicalexperience AT landryguillaume mrguidedsbrtboostforpatientswithlocallyadvancedorrecurrentgynecologicalcancersineligibleforbrachytherapyfeasibilityandearlyclinicalexperience AT belkaclaus mrguidedsbrtboostforpatientswithlocallyadvancedorrecurrentgynecologicalcancersineligibleforbrachytherapyfeasibilityandearlyclinicalexperience AT niyazimaximilian mrguidedsbrtboostforpatientswithlocallyadvancedorrecurrentgynecologicalcancersineligibleforbrachytherapyfeasibilityandearlyclinicalexperience AT corradinistefanie mrguidedsbrtboostforpatientswithlocallyadvancedorrecurrentgynecologicalcancersineligibleforbrachytherapyfeasibilityandearlyclinicalexperience |