Cargando…

One year into COVID-19: What have we learned about child maltreatment reports and child protective service responses?

BACKGROUND: A year has passed since COVID-19 began disrupting systems. Although children are not considered a risk population for the virus, there is accumulating knowledge regarding children's escalating risk for maltreatment during the pandemic. OBJECTIVE: The current study is part of a large...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katz, Ilan, Priolo-Filho, Sidnei, Katz, Carmit, Andresen, Sabine, Bérubé, Annie, Cohen, Noa, Connell, Christian M., Collin-Vézina, Delphine, Fallon, Barbara, Fouche, Ansie, Fujiwara, Takeo, Haffejee, Sadiyya, Korbin, Jill E., Maguire-Jack, Katie, Massarweh, Nadia, Munoz, Pablo, Tarabulsy, George M., Tiwari, Ashwini, Truter, Elmien, Varela, Natalia, Wekerle, Christine, Yamaoka, Yui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8760954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34996621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105473
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: A year has passed since COVID-19 began disrupting systems. Although children are not considered a risk population for the virus, there is accumulating knowledge regarding children's escalating risk for maltreatment during the pandemic. OBJECTIVE: The current study is part of a larger initiative using an international platform to examine child maltreatment (CM) reports and child protective service (CPS) responses in various countries. The first data collection, which included a comparison between eight countries after the pandemic's first wave (March–June 2020), illustrated a worrisome picture regarding children's wellbeing. The current study presents the second wave of data across 12 regions via population data (Australia [New South Wales], Brazil, United States [California, Pennsylvania], Colombia, England, Germany, Israel, Japan, Canada [Ontario, Quebec], South Africa). METHOD: Regional information was gathered, including demographics, economic situation, and CPS responses to COVID-19. A descriptive analysis was conducted to provide an overview of the phenomenon. RESULTS: Across all of the countries, COVID-19 had a substantial negative impact on the operation of CPSs and the children and families they serve by disrupting in-person services. One year into the COVID-19 pandemic, new reports of CM varied across the regions. In some, the impact of COVID-19 on CPS was low to moderate, while in others, more significant changes created multiple challenges for CPS services. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 created a barrier for CPS to access and protect children. The dramatic variance between the regions demonstrated how social, economic and structural contexts impact both CM reports and CPS responses.