Cargando…

Patient Reported Outcome Measures After Breast Augmentation – Using the BREAST-Q IS

PURPOSE: Cosmetic breast augmentation procedures are commonly performed breast device surgeries. The Australian Breast Device Registry (ABDR) administers a five-question patient reported outcome measure (PROM), the BREAST-Q Implant Surveillance module (BREAST-Q IS), to patients 1, 2 and 5 years afte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jayasinghe, Randi T, Ruseckaite, Rasa, Gartoulla, Pragya, Elder, Elisabeth, Hopper, Ingrid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35046741
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S330163
_version_ 1784633450246963200
author Jayasinghe, Randi T
Ruseckaite, Rasa
Gartoulla, Pragya
Elder, Elisabeth
Hopper, Ingrid
author_facet Jayasinghe, Randi T
Ruseckaite, Rasa
Gartoulla, Pragya
Elder, Elisabeth
Hopper, Ingrid
author_sort Jayasinghe, Randi T
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Cosmetic breast augmentation procedures are commonly performed breast device surgeries. The Australian Breast Device Registry (ABDR) administers a five-question patient reported outcome measure (PROM), the BREAST-Q Implant Surveillance module (BREAST-Q IS), to patients 1, 2 and 5 years after breast device surgery. The measure includes an open-ended question to add any comments. This study aimed to use the responses to this open-ended question to assess participants’ experiences of breast devices 1 and 2 years after breast augmentation. The secondary objective was to identify emerging and important issues relating to breast augmentation and devices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This qualitative descriptive study was conducted using a randomly selected sample of 268 responses to the open-ended question in the BREAST-Q IS, from the ABDR database. These responses were from patients who underwent breast augmentation between 2015 and 2018. Comments were analyzed using conventional content analysis in NVivo 12. RESULTS: Four major themes were identified: satisfaction following breast augmentation, dissatisfaction following breast augmentation, complications and breast symptoms following breast augmentation and other comments. Two dominant themes were regarding satisfaction (n = 112) with overall surgical outcome, medical team, and post-operative appearance and complications and breast symptoms (n = 177) following breast augmentation. Emerging issues identified were rippling of breast implants and breast implant illness (BII). CONCLUSION: PROMs can be used to understand patients’ perspectives on various aspects of their own surgical experiences. Participants provided responses regarding complications and breast symptoms experienced, and rippling of the breast implants and BII are emerging issues after breast augmentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8761034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87610342022-01-18 Patient Reported Outcome Measures After Breast Augmentation – Using the BREAST-Q IS Jayasinghe, Randi T Ruseckaite, Rasa Gartoulla, Pragya Elder, Elisabeth Hopper, Ingrid Patient Relat Outcome Meas Original Research PURPOSE: Cosmetic breast augmentation procedures are commonly performed breast device surgeries. The Australian Breast Device Registry (ABDR) administers a five-question patient reported outcome measure (PROM), the BREAST-Q Implant Surveillance module (BREAST-Q IS), to patients 1, 2 and 5 years after breast device surgery. The measure includes an open-ended question to add any comments. This study aimed to use the responses to this open-ended question to assess participants’ experiences of breast devices 1 and 2 years after breast augmentation. The secondary objective was to identify emerging and important issues relating to breast augmentation and devices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This qualitative descriptive study was conducted using a randomly selected sample of 268 responses to the open-ended question in the BREAST-Q IS, from the ABDR database. These responses were from patients who underwent breast augmentation between 2015 and 2018. Comments were analyzed using conventional content analysis in NVivo 12. RESULTS: Four major themes were identified: satisfaction following breast augmentation, dissatisfaction following breast augmentation, complications and breast symptoms following breast augmentation and other comments. Two dominant themes were regarding satisfaction (n = 112) with overall surgical outcome, medical team, and post-operative appearance and complications and breast symptoms (n = 177) following breast augmentation. Emerging issues identified were rippling of breast implants and breast implant illness (BII). CONCLUSION: PROMs can be used to understand patients’ perspectives on various aspects of their own surgical experiences. Participants provided responses regarding complications and breast symptoms experienced, and rippling of the breast implants and BII are emerging issues after breast augmentation. Dove 2022-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8761034/ /pubmed/35046741 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S330163 Text en © 2022 Jayasinghe et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Jayasinghe, Randi T
Ruseckaite, Rasa
Gartoulla, Pragya
Elder, Elisabeth
Hopper, Ingrid
Patient Reported Outcome Measures After Breast Augmentation – Using the BREAST-Q IS
title Patient Reported Outcome Measures After Breast Augmentation – Using the BREAST-Q IS
title_full Patient Reported Outcome Measures After Breast Augmentation – Using the BREAST-Q IS
title_fullStr Patient Reported Outcome Measures After Breast Augmentation – Using the BREAST-Q IS
title_full_unstemmed Patient Reported Outcome Measures After Breast Augmentation – Using the BREAST-Q IS
title_short Patient Reported Outcome Measures After Breast Augmentation – Using the BREAST-Q IS
title_sort patient reported outcome measures after breast augmentation – using the breast-q is
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35046741
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S330163
work_keys_str_mv AT jayasingherandit patientreportedoutcomemeasuresafterbreastaugmentationusingthebreastqis
AT ruseckaiterasa patientreportedoutcomemeasuresafterbreastaugmentationusingthebreastqis
AT gartoullapragya patientreportedoutcomemeasuresafterbreastaugmentationusingthebreastqis
AT elderelisabeth patientreportedoutcomemeasuresafterbreastaugmentationusingthebreastqis
AT hopperingrid patientreportedoutcomemeasuresafterbreastaugmentationusingthebreastqis