Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen test for COVID-19 in an emergency department

Use of antigen tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 has become widespread. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the nasopharyngeal rapid antigen diagnostic (RAD) immunoassay LumiraDx UK in an Emergency Department (ED). All patients admitted to our ED between November 11 an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elli, Silvia, Blasi, Francesco, Brignolo, Barbara, Ceriotti, Ferruccio, Gori, Andrea, Piatti, Alessandra, Solbiati, Monica, Costantino, Giorgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35216863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115635
_version_ 1784633468374745088
author Elli, Silvia
Blasi, Francesco
Brignolo, Barbara
Ceriotti, Ferruccio
Gori, Andrea
Piatti, Alessandra
Solbiati, Monica
Costantino, Giorgio
author_facet Elli, Silvia
Blasi, Francesco
Brignolo, Barbara
Ceriotti, Ferruccio
Gori, Andrea
Piatti, Alessandra
Solbiati, Monica
Costantino, Giorgio
author_sort Elli, Silvia
collection PubMed
description Use of antigen tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 has become widespread. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the nasopharyngeal rapid antigen diagnostic (RAD) immunoassay LumiraDx UK in an Emergency Department (ED). All patients admitted to our ED between November 11 and December 8, 2020, and had both a RAD test and a real-time-reverse-transcription-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) test were enrolled. RAD was considered as the index test and RT-PCR test was used as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, and likelihood ratios were calculated with the 95% confidence interval. The sensitivity and specificity of RAD were 34.2% and 92.3%. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 4.4 and 0.71. Our results demonstrate that the diagnostic accuracy of the LumiraDx RAD test is too low for routine use as a diagnostic method in the ED.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8761115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87611152022-01-18 Diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen test for COVID-19 in an emergency department Elli, Silvia Blasi, Francesco Brignolo, Barbara Ceriotti, Ferruccio Gori, Andrea Piatti, Alessandra Solbiati, Monica Costantino, Giorgio Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Article Use of antigen tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 has become widespread. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the nasopharyngeal rapid antigen diagnostic (RAD) immunoassay LumiraDx UK in an Emergency Department (ED). All patients admitted to our ED between November 11 and December 8, 2020, and had both a RAD test and a real-time-reverse-transcription-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) test were enrolled. RAD was considered as the index test and RT-PCR test was used as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, and likelihood ratios were calculated with the 95% confidence interval. The sensitivity and specificity of RAD were 34.2% and 92.3%. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 4.4 and 0.71. Our results demonstrate that the diagnostic accuracy of the LumiraDx RAD test is too low for routine use as a diagnostic method in the ED. Elsevier Inc. 2022-04 2022-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8761115/ /pubmed/35216863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115635 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Elli, Silvia
Blasi, Francesco
Brignolo, Barbara
Ceriotti, Ferruccio
Gori, Andrea
Piatti, Alessandra
Solbiati, Monica
Costantino, Giorgio
Diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen test for COVID-19 in an emergency department
title Diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen test for COVID-19 in an emergency department
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen test for COVID-19 in an emergency department
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen test for COVID-19 in an emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen test for COVID-19 in an emergency department
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen test for COVID-19 in an emergency department
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen test for covid-19 in an emergency department
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35216863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115635
work_keys_str_mv AT ellisilvia diagnosticaccuracyofrapidantigentestforcovid19inanemergencydepartment
AT blasifrancesco diagnosticaccuracyofrapidantigentestforcovid19inanemergencydepartment
AT brignolobarbara diagnosticaccuracyofrapidantigentestforcovid19inanemergencydepartment
AT ceriottiferruccio diagnosticaccuracyofrapidantigentestforcovid19inanemergencydepartment
AT goriandrea diagnosticaccuracyofrapidantigentestforcovid19inanemergencydepartment
AT piattialessandra diagnosticaccuracyofrapidantigentestforcovid19inanemergencydepartment
AT solbiatimonica diagnosticaccuracyofrapidantigentestforcovid19inanemergencydepartment
AT costantinogiorgio diagnosticaccuracyofrapidantigentestforcovid19inanemergencydepartment