Cargando…

Augmented reality visualization in brain lesions: a prospective randomized controlled evaluation of its potential and current limitations in navigated microneurosurgery

BACKGROUND: Augmented reality (AR) has the potential to support complex neurosurgical interventions by including visual information seamlessly. This study examines intraoperative visualization parameters and clinical impact of AR in brain tumor surgery. METHODS: Fifty-five intracranial lesions, oper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roethe, Anna L., Rösler, Judith, Misch, Martin, Vajkoczy, Peter, Picht, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34904183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-05045-1
_version_ 1784633473835728896
author Roethe, Anna L.
Rösler, Judith
Misch, Martin
Vajkoczy, Peter
Picht, Thomas
author_facet Roethe, Anna L.
Rösler, Judith
Misch, Martin
Vajkoczy, Peter
Picht, Thomas
author_sort Roethe, Anna L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Augmented reality (AR) has the potential to support complex neurosurgical interventions by including visual information seamlessly. This study examines intraoperative visualization parameters and clinical impact of AR in brain tumor surgery. METHODS: Fifty-five intracranial lesions, operated either with AR-navigated microscope (n = 39) or conventional neuronavigation (n = 16) after randomization, have been included prospectively. Surgical resection time, duration/type/mode of AR, displayed objects (n, type), pointer-based navigation checks (n), usability of control, quality indicators, and overall surgical usefulness of AR have been assessed. RESULTS: AR display has been used in 44.4% of resection time. Predominant AR type was navigation view (75.7%), followed by target volumes (20.1%). Predominant AR mode was picture-in-picture (PiP) (72.5%), followed by 23.3% overlay display. In 43.6% of cases, vision of important anatomical structures has been partially or entirely blocked by AR information. A total of 7.7% of cases used MRI navigation only, 30.8% used one, 23.1% used two, and 38.5% used three or more object segmentations in AR navigation. A total of 66.7% of surgeons found AR visualization helpful in the individual surgical case. AR depth information and accuracy have been rated acceptable (median 3.0 vs. median 5.0 in conventional neuronavigation). The mean utilization of the navigation pointer was 2.6 × /resection hour (AR) vs. 9.7 × /resection hour (neuronavigation); navigation effort was significantly reduced in AR (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The main benefit of HUD-based AR visualization in brain tumor surgery is the integrated continuous display allowing for pointer-less navigation. Navigation view (PiP) provides the highest usability while blocking the operative field less frequently. Visualization quality will benefit from improvements in registration accuracy and depth impression. GERMAN CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER. DRKS00016955. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-021-05045-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8761141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87611412022-01-26 Augmented reality visualization in brain lesions: a prospective randomized controlled evaluation of its potential and current limitations in navigated microneurosurgery Roethe, Anna L. Rösler, Judith Misch, Martin Vajkoczy, Peter Picht, Thomas Acta Neurochir (Wien) Original Article - Neurosurgical technique evaluation BACKGROUND: Augmented reality (AR) has the potential to support complex neurosurgical interventions by including visual information seamlessly. This study examines intraoperative visualization parameters and clinical impact of AR in brain tumor surgery. METHODS: Fifty-five intracranial lesions, operated either with AR-navigated microscope (n = 39) or conventional neuronavigation (n = 16) after randomization, have been included prospectively. Surgical resection time, duration/type/mode of AR, displayed objects (n, type), pointer-based navigation checks (n), usability of control, quality indicators, and overall surgical usefulness of AR have been assessed. RESULTS: AR display has been used in 44.4% of resection time. Predominant AR type was navigation view (75.7%), followed by target volumes (20.1%). Predominant AR mode was picture-in-picture (PiP) (72.5%), followed by 23.3% overlay display. In 43.6% of cases, vision of important anatomical structures has been partially or entirely blocked by AR information. A total of 7.7% of cases used MRI navigation only, 30.8% used one, 23.1% used two, and 38.5% used three or more object segmentations in AR navigation. A total of 66.7% of surgeons found AR visualization helpful in the individual surgical case. AR depth information and accuracy have been rated acceptable (median 3.0 vs. median 5.0 in conventional neuronavigation). The mean utilization of the navigation pointer was 2.6 × /resection hour (AR) vs. 9.7 × /resection hour (neuronavigation); navigation effort was significantly reduced in AR (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The main benefit of HUD-based AR visualization in brain tumor surgery is the integrated continuous display allowing for pointer-less navigation. Navigation view (PiP) provides the highest usability while blocking the operative field less frequently. Visualization quality will benefit from improvements in registration accuracy and depth impression. GERMAN CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER. DRKS00016955. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-021-05045-1. Springer Vienna 2021-12-13 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8761141/ /pubmed/34904183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-05045-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article - Neurosurgical technique evaluation
Roethe, Anna L.
Rösler, Judith
Misch, Martin
Vajkoczy, Peter
Picht, Thomas
Augmented reality visualization in brain lesions: a prospective randomized controlled evaluation of its potential and current limitations in navigated microneurosurgery
title Augmented reality visualization in brain lesions: a prospective randomized controlled evaluation of its potential and current limitations in navigated microneurosurgery
title_full Augmented reality visualization in brain lesions: a prospective randomized controlled evaluation of its potential and current limitations in navigated microneurosurgery
title_fullStr Augmented reality visualization in brain lesions: a prospective randomized controlled evaluation of its potential and current limitations in navigated microneurosurgery
title_full_unstemmed Augmented reality visualization in brain lesions: a prospective randomized controlled evaluation of its potential and current limitations in navigated microneurosurgery
title_short Augmented reality visualization in brain lesions: a prospective randomized controlled evaluation of its potential and current limitations in navigated microneurosurgery
title_sort augmented reality visualization in brain lesions: a prospective randomized controlled evaluation of its potential and current limitations in navigated microneurosurgery
topic Original Article - Neurosurgical technique evaluation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34904183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-05045-1
work_keys_str_mv AT roetheannal augmentedrealityvisualizationinbrainlesionsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledevaluationofitspotentialandcurrentlimitationsinnavigatedmicroneurosurgery
AT roslerjudith augmentedrealityvisualizationinbrainlesionsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledevaluationofitspotentialandcurrentlimitationsinnavigatedmicroneurosurgery
AT mischmartin augmentedrealityvisualizationinbrainlesionsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledevaluationofitspotentialandcurrentlimitationsinnavigatedmicroneurosurgery
AT vajkoczypeter augmentedrealityvisualizationinbrainlesionsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledevaluationofitspotentialandcurrentlimitationsinnavigatedmicroneurosurgery
AT pichtthomas augmentedrealityvisualizationinbrainlesionsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledevaluationofitspotentialandcurrentlimitationsinnavigatedmicroneurosurgery