Cargando…

Treatment status of extremely premature infants with gestational age < 28 weeks in a Chinese perinatal center from 2010 to 2019

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of studies conducted in China on the outcomes of all live-birth extremely premature infants (EPIs) and there is no unified recommendation on the active treatment of the minimum gestational age in the field of perinatal medicine in China. We aimed to investigate the cur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Wen-Wen, Yu, Yong-Hui, Dong, Xiao-Yu, Reddy, Simmy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34767193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12519-021-00481-6
_version_ 1784633475856334848
author Zhang, Wen-Wen
Yu, Yong-Hui
Dong, Xiao-Yu
Reddy, Simmy
author_facet Zhang, Wen-Wen
Yu, Yong-Hui
Dong, Xiao-Yu
Reddy, Simmy
author_sort Zhang, Wen-Wen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of studies conducted in China on the outcomes of all live-birth extremely premature infants (EPIs) and there is no unified recommendation on the active treatment of the minimum gestational age in the field of perinatal medicine in China. We aimed to investigate the current treatment situation of EPIs and to provide evidence for formulating reasonable treatment recommendations. METHODS: We established a real-world ambispective cohort study of all live births in delivery rooms with gestational age (GA) between 24(+0) and 27(+6) weeks from 2010 to 2019. RESULTS: Of the 1163 EPIs included in our study, 241 (20.7%) survived, while 849 (73.0%) died in the delivery room and 73 (6.3%) died in the neonatal intensive care unit. Among all included EPIs, 862 (74.1%) died from withholding or withdrawal of care. Regardless of stratification according to GA or birth weight, the proportion of total mortality attributable to withdrawal of care is high. For infants with the GA of 24 weeks, active treatment did not extend their survival time (P = 0.224). The survival time without severe morbidity of the active treatment was significantly longer than that of withdrawing care for infants older than 25 weeks (P < 0.001). Over time, the survival rate improved, and the withdrawal of care caused by socioeconomic factors and primary nonintervention were reduced significantly (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The mortality rate of EPIs is still high. Withdrawal of care is common for EPIs with smaller GA, especially in the delivery room. It is necessary to use a multi-center, large sample of real-world data to find the survival limit of active treatment based on our treatment capabilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8761149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87611492022-01-26 Treatment status of extremely premature infants with gestational age < 28 weeks in a Chinese perinatal center from 2010 to 2019 Zhang, Wen-Wen Yu, Yong-Hui Dong, Xiao-Yu Reddy, Simmy World J Pediatr Original Article BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of studies conducted in China on the outcomes of all live-birth extremely premature infants (EPIs) and there is no unified recommendation on the active treatment of the minimum gestational age in the field of perinatal medicine in China. We aimed to investigate the current treatment situation of EPIs and to provide evidence for formulating reasonable treatment recommendations. METHODS: We established a real-world ambispective cohort study of all live births in delivery rooms with gestational age (GA) between 24(+0) and 27(+6) weeks from 2010 to 2019. RESULTS: Of the 1163 EPIs included in our study, 241 (20.7%) survived, while 849 (73.0%) died in the delivery room and 73 (6.3%) died in the neonatal intensive care unit. Among all included EPIs, 862 (74.1%) died from withholding or withdrawal of care. Regardless of stratification according to GA or birth weight, the proportion of total mortality attributable to withdrawal of care is high. For infants with the GA of 24 weeks, active treatment did not extend their survival time (P = 0.224). The survival time without severe morbidity of the active treatment was significantly longer than that of withdrawing care for infants older than 25 weeks (P < 0.001). Over time, the survival rate improved, and the withdrawal of care caused by socioeconomic factors and primary nonintervention were reduced significantly (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The mortality rate of EPIs is still high. Withdrawal of care is common for EPIs with smaller GA, especially in the delivery room. It is necessary to use a multi-center, large sample of real-world data to find the survival limit of active treatment based on our treatment capabilities. Springer Singapore 2021-11-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8761149/ /pubmed/34767193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12519-021-00481-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhang, Wen-Wen
Yu, Yong-Hui
Dong, Xiao-Yu
Reddy, Simmy
Treatment status of extremely premature infants with gestational age < 28 weeks in a Chinese perinatal center from 2010 to 2019
title Treatment status of extremely premature infants with gestational age < 28 weeks in a Chinese perinatal center from 2010 to 2019
title_full Treatment status of extremely premature infants with gestational age < 28 weeks in a Chinese perinatal center from 2010 to 2019
title_fullStr Treatment status of extremely premature infants with gestational age < 28 weeks in a Chinese perinatal center from 2010 to 2019
title_full_unstemmed Treatment status of extremely premature infants with gestational age < 28 weeks in a Chinese perinatal center from 2010 to 2019
title_short Treatment status of extremely premature infants with gestational age < 28 weeks in a Chinese perinatal center from 2010 to 2019
title_sort treatment status of extremely premature infants with gestational age < 28 weeks in a chinese perinatal center from 2010 to 2019
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34767193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12519-021-00481-6
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangwenwen treatmentstatusofextremelyprematureinfantswithgestationalage28weeksinachineseperinatalcenterfrom2010to2019
AT yuyonghui treatmentstatusofextremelyprematureinfantswithgestationalage28weeksinachineseperinatalcenterfrom2010to2019
AT dongxiaoyu treatmentstatusofextremelyprematureinfantswithgestationalage28weeksinachineseperinatalcenterfrom2010to2019
AT reddysimmy treatmentstatusofextremelyprematureinfantswithgestationalage28weeksinachineseperinatalcenterfrom2010to2019