Cargando…

Women’s health behaviour change after receiving breast cancer risk estimates with tailored screening and prevention recommendations

BACKGROUND: The Predicting Risk of Cancer at Screening (PROCAS) study provided women who were eligible for breast cancer screening in Greater Manchester (United Kingdom) with their 10-year risk of breast cancer, i.e., low (≤1.5%), average (1.5–4.99%), moderate (5.-7.99%) or high (≥8%). The aim of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rainey, Linda, van der Waal, Daniëlle, Donnelly, Louise S., Southworth, Jake, French, David P., Evans, D. Gareth, Broeders, Mireille J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35033023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09174-3
_version_ 1784633500769452032
author Rainey, Linda
van der Waal, Daniëlle
Donnelly, Louise S.
Southworth, Jake
French, David P.
Evans, D. Gareth
Broeders, Mireille J. M.
author_facet Rainey, Linda
van der Waal, Daniëlle
Donnelly, Louise S.
Southworth, Jake
French, David P.
Evans, D. Gareth
Broeders, Mireille J. M.
author_sort Rainey, Linda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Predicting Risk of Cancer at Screening (PROCAS) study provided women who were eligible for breast cancer screening in Greater Manchester (United Kingdom) with their 10-year risk of breast cancer, i.e., low (≤1.5%), average (1.5–4.99%), moderate (5.-7.99%) or high (≥8%). The aim of this study is to explore which factors were associated with women’s uptake of screening and prevention recommendations. Additionally, we evaluated women’s organisational preferences regarding tailored screening. METHODS: A total of 325 women with a self-reported low (n = 60), average (n = 125), moderate (n = 80), or high (n = 60) risk completed a two-part web-based survey. The first part contained questions about personal characteristics. For the second part women were asked about uptake of early detection and preventive behaviours after breast cancer risk communication. Additional questions were posed to explore preferences regarding the organisation of risk-stratified screening and prevention. We performed exploratory univariable and multivariable regression analyses to assess which factors were associated with uptake of primary and secondary breast cancer preventive behaviours, stratified by breast cancer risk. Organisational preferences are presented using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Self-reported breast cancer risk predicted uptake of (a) supplemental screening and breast self-examination, (b) risk-reducing medication and (c) preventive lifestyle behaviours. Further predictors were (a) having a first degree relative with breast cancer, (b) higher age, and (c) higher body mass index (BMI). Women’s organisational preferences for tailored screening emphasised a desire for more intensive screening for women at increased risk by further shortening the screening interval and moving the starting age forward. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer risk communication predicts the uptake of key tailored primary and secondary preventive behaviours. Effective communication of breast cancer risk information is essential to optimise the population-wide impact of tailored screening. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09174-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8761310
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87613102022-01-18 Women’s health behaviour change after receiving breast cancer risk estimates with tailored screening and prevention recommendations Rainey, Linda van der Waal, Daniëlle Donnelly, Louise S. Southworth, Jake French, David P. Evans, D. Gareth Broeders, Mireille J. M. BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: The Predicting Risk of Cancer at Screening (PROCAS) study provided women who were eligible for breast cancer screening in Greater Manchester (United Kingdom) with their 10-year risk of breast cancer, i.e., low (≤1.5%), average (1.5–4.99%), moderate (5.-7.99%) or high (≥8%). The aim of this study is to explore which factors were associated with women’s uptake of screening and prevention recommendations. Additionally, we evaluated women’s organisational preferences regarding tailored screening. METHODS: A total of 325 women with a self-reported low (n = 60), average (n = 125), moderate (n = 80), or high (n = 60) risk completed a two-part web-based survey. The first part contained questions about personal characteristics. For the second part women were asked about uptake of early detection and preventive behaviours after breast cancer risk communication. Additional questions were posed to explore preferences regarding the organisation of risk-stratified screening and prevention. We performed exploratory univariable and multivariable regression analyses to assess which factors were associated with uptake of primary and secondary breast cancer preventive behaviours, stratified by breast cancer risk. Organisational preferences are presented using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Self-reported breast cancer risk predicted uptake of (a) supplemental screening and breast self-examination, (b) risk-reducing medication and (c) preventive lifestyle behaviours. Further predictors were (a) having a first degree relative with breast cancer, (b) higher age, and (c) higher body mass index (BMI). Women’s organisational preferences for tailored screening emphasised a desire for more intensive screening for women at increased risk by further shortening the screening interval and moving the starting age forward. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer risk communication predicts the uptake of key tailored primary and secondary preventive behaviours. Effective communication of breast cancer risk information is essential to optimise the population-wide impact of tailored screening. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09174-3. BioMed Central 2022-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8761310/ /pubmed/35033023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09174-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Rainey, Linda
van der Waal, Daniëlle
Donnelly, Louise S.
Southworth, Jake
French, David P.
Evans, D. Gareth
Broeders, Mireille J. M.
Women’s health behaviour change after receiving breast cancer risk estimates with tailored screening and prevention recommendations
title Women’s health behaviour change after receiving breast cancer risk estimates with tailored screening and prevention recommendations
title_full Women’s health behaviour change after receiving breast cancer risk estimates with tailored screening and prevention recommendations
title_fullStr Women’s health behaviour change after receiving breast cancer risk estimates with tailored screening and prevention recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Women’s health behaviour change after receiving breast cancer risk estimates with tailored screening and prevention recommendations
title_short Women’s health behaviour change after receiving breast cancer risk estimates with tailored screening and prevention recommendations
title_sort women’s health behaviour change after receiving breast cancer risk estimates with tailored screening and prevention recommendations
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35033023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09174-3
work_keys_str_mv AT raineylinda womenshealthbehaviourchangeafterreceivingbreastcancerriskestimateswithtailoredscreeningandpreventionrecommendations
AT vanderwaaldanielle womenshealthbehaviourchangeafterreceivingbreastcancerriskestimateswithtailoredscreeningandpreventionrecommendations
AT donnellylouises womenshealthbehaviourchangeafterreceivingbreastcancerriskestimateswithtailoredscreeningandpreventionrecommendations
AT southworthjake womenshealthbehaviourchangeafterreceivingbreastcancerriskestimateswithtailoredscreeningandpreventionrecommendations
AT frenchdavidp womenshealthbehaviourchangeafterreceivingbreastcancerriskestimateswithtailoredscreeningandpreventionrecommendations
AT evansdgareth womenshealthbehaviourchangeafterreceivingbreastcancerriskestimateswithtailoredscreeningandpreventionrecommendations
AT broedersmireillejm womenshealthbehaviourchangeafterreceivingbreastcancerriskestimateswithtailoredscreeningandpreventionrecommendations