Cargando…
A blinded evaluation of privacy preserving record linkage with Bloom filters
BACKGROUND: Privacy preserving record linkage (PPRL) methods using Bloom filters have shown promise for use in operational linkage settings. However real-world evaluations are required to confirm their suitability in practice. METHODS: An extract of records from the Western Australian (WA) Hospital...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35034615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01510-2 |
_version_ | 1784633504815906816 |
---|---|
author | Randall, Sean Wichmann, Helen Brown, Adrian Boyd, James Eitelhuber, Tom Merchant, Alexandra Ferrante, Anna |
author_facet | Randall, Sean Wichmann, Helen Brown, Adrian Boyd, James Eitelhuber, Tom Merchant, Alexandra Ferrante, Anna |
author_sort | Randall, Sean |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Privacy preserving record linkage (PPRL) methods using Bloom filters have shown promise for use in operational linkage settings. However real-world evaluations are required to confirm their suitability in practice. METHODS: An extract of records from the Western Australian (WA) Hospital Morbidity Data Collection 2011–2015 and WA Death Registrations 2011–2015 were encoded to Bloom filters, and then linked using privacy-preserving methods. Results were compared to a traditional, un-encoded linkage of the same datasets using the same blocking criteria to enable direct investigation of the comparison step. The encoded linkage was carried out in a blinded setting, where there was no access to un-encoded data or a ‘truth set’. RESULTS: The PPRL method using Bloom filters provided similar linkage quality to the traditional un-encoded linkage, with 99.3% of ‘groupings’ identical between privacy preserving and clear-text linkage. CONCLUSION: The Bloom filter method appears suitable for use in situations where clear-text identifiers cannot be provided for linkage. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01510-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8761329 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87613292022-01-18 A blinded evaluation of privacy preserving record linkage with Bloom filters Randall, Sean Wichmann, Helen Brown, Adrian Boyd, James Eitelhuber, Tom Merchant, Alexandra Ferrante, Anna BMC Med Res Methodol Research BACKGROUND: Privacy preserving record linkage (PPRL) methods using Bloom filters have shown promise for use in operational linkage settings. However real-world evaluations are required to confirm their suitability in practice. METHODS: An extract of records from the Western Australian (WA) Hospital Morbidity Data Collection 2011–2015 and WA Death Registrations 2011–2015 were encoded to Bloom filters, and then linked using privacy-preserving methods. Results were compared to a traditional, un-encoded linkage of the same datasets using the same blocking criteria to enable direct investigation of the comparison step. The encoded linkage was carried out in a blinded setting, where there was no access to un-encoded data or a ‘truth set’. RESULTS: The PPRL method using Bloom filters provided similar linkage quality to the traditional un-encoded linkage, with 99.3% of ‘groupings’ identical between privacy preserving and clear-text linkage. CONCLUSION: The Bloom filter method appears suitable for use in situations where clear-text identifiers cannot be provided for linkage. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01510-2. BioMed Central 2022-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8761329/ /pubmed/35034615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01510-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Randall, Sean Wichmann, Helen Brown, Adrian Boyd, James Eitelhuber, Tom Merchant, Alexandra Ferrante, Anna A blinded evaluation of privacy preserving record linkage with Bloom filters |
title | A blinded evaluation of privacy preserving record linkage with Bloom filters |
title_full | A blinded evaluation of privacy preserving record linkage with Bloom filters |
title_fullStr | A blinded evaluation of privacy preserving record linkage with Bloom filters |
title_full_unstemmed | A blinded evaluation of privacy preserving record linkage with Bloom filters |
title_short | A blinded evaluation of privacy preserving record linkage with Bloom filters |
title_sort | blinded evaluation of privacy preserving record linkage with bloom filters |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35034615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01510-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT randallsean ablindedevaluationofprivacypreservingrecordlinkagewithbloomfilters AT wichmannhelen ablindedevaluationofprivacypreservingrecordlinkagewithbloomfilters AT brownadrian ablindedevaluationofprivacypreservingrecordlinkagewithbloomfilters AT boydjames ablindedevaluationofprivacypreservingrecordlinkagewithbloomfilters AT eitelhubertom ablindedevaluationofprivacypreservingrecordlinkagewithbloomfilters AT merchantalexandra ablindedevaluationofprivacypreservingrecordlinkagewithbloomfilters AT ferranteanna ablindedevaluationofprivacypreservingrecordlinkagewithbloomfilters AT randallsean blindedevaluationofprivacypreservingrecordlinkagewithbloomfilters AT wichmannhelen blindedevaluationofprivacypreservingrecordlinkagewithbloomfilters AT brownadrian blindedevaluationofprivacypreservingrecordlinkagewithbloomfilters AT boydjames blindedevaluationofprivacypreservingrecordlinkagewithbloomfilters AT eitelhubertom blindedevaluationofprivacypreservingrecordlinkagewithbloomfilters AT merchantalexandra blindedevaluationofprivacypreservingrecordlinkagewithbloomfilters AT ferranteanna blindedevaluationofprivacypreservingrecordlinkagewithbloomfilters |