Cargando…

Dynamic changes of IgM and IgG antibodies in asymptomatic patients as an effective way to detect SARS‐CoV‐2 infection

BACKGROUND: COVID‐19 has become a global pandemic, and close contacts and asymptomatic patients are worthy of attention. METHODS: A total of 1844 people in close contacts with 76 COVID‐19 patients were investigated, and nasopharyngeal swabs and venous blood were collected for centralized medical qua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Ping, Shen, Ge, Zhu, Zhenhua, Shi, Shengjie, Hu, Yan, Zeng, Ziyan, Zhou, Hui, Li, Qiong, Zhu, Pan, Yang, Gang, Liu, Zugui, Fu, Huiyuan, Hu, Junyu, He, Ying, Yang, Qingting, Dai, Miao, Zhou, Dan, Lu, Qingqing, Xie, Xiaobing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34914135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24080
_version_ 1784633523211075584
author Li, Ping
Shen, Ge
Zhu, Zhenhua
Shi, Shengjie
Hu, Yan
Zeng, Ziyan
Zhou, Hui
Li, Qiong
Zhu, Pan
Yang, Gang
Liu, Zugui
Fu, Huiyuan
Hu, Junyu
He, Ying
Yang, Qingting
Dai, Miao
Zhou, Dan
Lu, Qingqing
Xie, Xiaobing
author_facet Li, Ping
Shen, Ge
Zhu, Zhenhua
Shi, Shengjie
Hu, Yan
Zeng, Ziyan
Zhou, Hui
Li, Qiong
Zhu, Pan
Yang, Gang
Liu, Zugui
Fu, Huiyuan
Hu, Junyu
He, Ying
Yang, Qingting
Dai, Miao
Zhou, Dan
Lu, Qingqing
Xie, Xiaobing
author_sort Li, Ping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: COVID‐19 has become a global pandemic, and close contacts and asymptomatic patients are worthy of attention. METHODS: A total of 1844 people in close contacts with 76 COVID‐19 patients were investigated, and nasopharyngeal swabs and venous blood were collected for centralized medical quarantine observation. Real‐time fluorescence was used to detect SARS‐CoV‐2 nucleic acid in nasopharyngeal swabs of all close contacts, and the colloidal gold method was used to detect serum‐specific antibodies. Levels of IgM‐ and IgG‐specific antibodies were detected quantitatively through chemiluminescence from the first nucleic acid turned negative date (0 week) and on weekly intervals of ≤1 week, 1–2 weeks, 2–3 weeks, 3–4 weeks, 4–5 weeks, 5–6 weeks, and 6–7 weeks. RESULTS: The total positive rate of the colloidal gold method (88.5%, 23/26) was significantly higher (χ(2) = 59.182, p < 0.001) than that of the healthy control group (2.0%, 1/50). There was significant difference in IgG concentration at different time points (0–7 weeks) after negative nucleic acid conversion (χ(2) = 14.034, p = 0.029). Serum IgG levels were significantly higher at weekly time points of 4–5 weeks (Z = −2.399, p = 0.016), 5–6 weeks (Z = −2.049, p = 0.040), and 6–7 weeks (Z = −2.197, p = 0.028) compared with 1–2 weeks after negative nucleic acid conversion. However, there was no significant difference (χ(2) = 4.936, p = 0.552) in IgM concentration between time points tested (0–7 weeks) after negative nucleic acid conversion. The positive rates of IgM and IgG in asymptomatic patients (χ(2) = 84.660, p < 0.001) were significantly higher than those in the healthy control group (χ(2) = 9.201, p = 0.002) within 7 weeks of negative nucleic acid conversion. CONCLUSIONS: The IgG concentration in asymptomatic cases remained at a high level after nucleic acid turned negative. Nucleic acid detection combined with IgM and IgG antibody detection is an effective way to screen asymptomatic infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8761420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87614202022-01-20 Dynamic changes of IgM and IgG antibodies in asymptomatic patients as an effective way to detect SARS‐CoV‐2 infection Li, Ping Shen, Ge Zhu, Zhenhua Shi, Shengjie Hu, Yan Zeng, Ziyan Zhou, Hui Li, Qiong Zhu, Pan Yang, Gang Liu, Zugui Fu, Huiyuan Hu, Junyu He, Ying Yang, Qingting Dai, Miao Zhou, Dan Lu, Qingqing Xie, Xiaobing J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles BACKGROUND: COVID‐19 has become a global pandemic, and close contacts and asymptomatic patients are worthy of attention. METHODS: A total of 1844 people in close contacts with 76 COVID‐19 patients were investigated, and nasopharyngeal swabs and venous blood were collected for centralized medical quarantine observation. Real‐time fluorescence was used to detect SARS‐CoV‐2 nucleic acid in nasopharyngeal swabs of all close contacts, and the colloidal gold method was used to detect serum‐specific antibodies. Levels of IgM‐ and IgG‐specific antibodies were detected quantitatively through chemiluminescence from the first nucleic acid turned negative date (0 week) and on weekly intervals of ≤1 week, 1–2 weeks, 2–3 weeks, 3–4 weeks, 4–5 weeks, 5–6 weeks, and 6–7 weeks. RESULTS: The total positive rate of the colloidal gold method (88.5%, 23/26) was significantly higher (χ(2) = 59.182, p < 0.001) than that of the healthy control group (2.0%, 1/50). There was significant difference in IgG concentration at different time points (0–7 weeks) after negative nucleic acid conversion (χ(2) = 14.034, p = 0.029). Serum IgG levels were significantly higher at weekly time points of 4–5 weeks (Z = −2.399, p = 0.016), 5–6 weeks (Z = −2.049, p = 0.040), and 6–7 weeks (Z = −2.197, p = 0.028) compared with 1–2 weeks after negative nucleic acid conversion. However, there was no significant difference (χ(2) = 4.936, p = 0.552) in IgM concentration between time points tested (0–7 weeks) after negative nucleic acid conversion. The positive rates of IgM and IgG in asymptomatic patients (χ(2) = 84.660, p < 0.001) were significantly higher than those in the healthy control group (χ(2) = 9.201, p = 0.002) within 7 weeks of negative nucleic acid conversion. CONCLUSIONS: The IgG concentration in asymptomatic cases remained at a high level after nucleic acid turned negative. Nucleic acid detection combined with IgM and IgG antibody detection is an effective way to screen asymptomatic infections. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8761420/ /pubmed/34914135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24080 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Li, Ping
Shen, Ge
Zhu, Zhenhua
Shi, Shengjie
Hu, Yan
Zeng, Ziyan
Zhou, Hui
Li, Qiong
Zhu, Pan
Yang, Gang
Liu, Zugui
Fu, Huiyuan
Hu, Junyu
He, Ying
Yang, Qingting
Dai, Miao
Zhou, Dan
Lu, Qingqing
Xie, Xiaobing
Dynamic changes of IgM and IgG antibodies in asymptomatic patients as an effective way to detect SARS‐CoV‐2 infection
title Dynamic changes of IgM and IgG antibodies in asymptomatic patients as an effective way to detect SARS‐CoV‐2 infection
title_full Dynamic changes of IgM and IgG antibodies in asymptomatic patients as an effective way to detect SARS‐CoV‐2 infection
title_fullStr Dynamic changes of IgM and IgG antibodies in asymptomatic patients as an effective way to detect SARS‐CoV‐2 infection
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic changes of IgM and IgG antibodies in asymptomatic patients as an effective way to detect SARS‐CoV‐2 infection
title_short Dynamic changes of IgM and IgG antibodies in asymptomatic patients as an effective way to detect SARS‐CoV‐2 infection
title_sort dynamic changes of igm and igg antibodies in asymptomatic patients as an effective way to detect sars‐cov‐2 infection
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34914135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24080
work_keys_str_mv AT liping dynamicchangesofigmandiggantibodiesinasymptomaticpatientsasaneffectivewaytodetectsarscov2infection
AT shenge dynamicchangesofigmandiggantibodiesinasymptomaticpatientsasaneffectivewaytodetectsarscov2infection
AT zhuzhenhua dynamicchangesofigmandiggantibodiesinasymptomaticpatientsasaneffectivewaytodetectsarscov2infection
AT shishengjie dynamicchangesofigmandiggantibodiesinasymptomaticpatientsasaneffectivewaytodetectsarscov2infection
AT huyan dynamicchangesofigmandiggantibodiesinasymptomaticpatientsasaneffectivewaytodetectsarscov2infection
AT zengziyan dynamicchangesofigmandiggantibodiesinasymptomaticpatientsasaneffectivewaytodetectsarscov2infection
AT zhouhui dynamicchangesofigmandiggantibodiesinasymptomaticpatientsasaneffectivewaytodetectsarscov2infection
AT liqiong dynamicchangesofigmandiggantibodiesinasymptomaticpatientsasaneffectivewaytodetectsarscov2infection
AT zhupan dynamicchangesofigmandiggantibodiesinasymptomaticpatientsasaneffectivewaytodetectsarscov2infection
AT yanggang dynamicchangesofigmandiggantibodiesinasymptomaticpatientsasaneffectivewaytodetectsarscov2infection
AT liuzugui dynamicchangesofigmandiggantibodiesinasymptomaticpatientsasaneffectivewaytodetectsarscov2infection
AT fuhuiyuan dynamicchangesofigmandiggantibodiesinasymptomaticpatientsasaneffectivewaytodetectsarscov2infection
AT hujunyu dynamicchangesofigmandiggantibodiesinasymptomaticpatientsasaneffectivewaytodetectsarscov2infection
AT heying dynamicchangesofigmandiggantibodiesinasymptomaticpatientsasaneffectivewaytodetectsarscov2infection
AT yangqingting dynamicchangesofigmandiggantibodiesinasymptomaticpatientsasaneffectivewaytodetectsarscov2infection
AT daimiao dynamicchangesofigmandiggantibodiesinasymptomaticpatientsasaneffectivewaytodetectsarscov2infection
AT zhoudan dynamicchangesofigmandiggantibodiesinasymptomaticpatientsasaneffectivewaytodetectsarscov2infection
AT luqingqing dynamicchangesofigmandiggantibodiesinasymptomaticpatientsasaneffectivewaytodetectsarscov2infection
AT xiexiaobing dynamicchangesofigmandiggantibodiesinasymptomaticpatientsasaneffectivewaytodetectsarscov2infection