Cargando…

The influence of age on prostate cancer screening index

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify parameters with a higher diagnostic value for early screening of prostate cancer (PCa) at different ages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 294 patients were included and divided into two groups according to the age of patients (≤66 and >66 years). Receiver o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shan, Jiahao, Liu, Ziyang, Geng, Xinyu, Feng, Yuelong, Yang, Xiaobo, Xu, Haoran, Zhou, Xiaojie, Ma, Wenzhuo, Zhu, Hengyu, Shi, Hongbin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34816496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24098
_version_ 1784633527122264064
author Shan, Jiahao
Liu, Ziyang
Geng, Xinyu
Feng, Yuelong
Yang, Xiaobo
Xu, Haoran
Zhou, Xiaojie
Ma, Wenzhuo
Zhu, Hengyu
Shi, Hongbin
author_facet Shan, Jiahao
Liu, Ziyang
Geng, Xinyu
Feng, Yuelong
Yang, Xiaobo
Xu, Haoran
Zhou, Xiaojie
Ma, Wenzhuo
Zhu, Hengyu
Shi, Hongbin
author_sort Shan, Jiahao
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify parameters with a higher diagnostic value for early screening of prostate cancer (PCa) at different ages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 294 patients were included and divided into two groups according to the age of patients (≤66 and >66 years). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of total prostate‐specific antigen (TPSA), free PSA (FPSA), (F/T)PSA, PSA density (PSAD), PSA–AV score, the ratio of patients' age to prostate volume (AVR) and (F/T)/PSAD were constructed. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated, and differences in the AUC values among the above‐mentioned parameters were compared. RESULTS: There were 121 patients in the ≤66 years age group (benign prostatic hyperplasia BPH, 103 patients; PCa 18 patients) and 173 patients in the >66 years age group (BPH, 100 patients; PCa, 73 patients). In the ≤66 years age group, the AUC value of AVR for PCa diagnosis was the highest; however, there was no statistically significant difference compared with the AUC values of PSAD and (F/T)/PSAD; compared with TPSA, FPSA, (F/T)PSA and PSA‐AV, the differences were statistically significant. In the >66 years age group, the AUC values of PSAD and PSA–AV for PCa diagnosis were higher than those of TPSA, FPSA, (F/T)PSA and (F/T)/PSAD, and the difference was statistically significant; however, the difference was not statistically significant when compared with the AUC value of AVR. CONCLUSION: In different age groups, screening indices for PCa diagnosis should be selected according to the age of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8761435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87614352022-01-20 The influence of age on prostate cancer screening index Shan, Jiahao Liu, Ziyang Geng, Xinyu Feng, Yuelong Yang, Xiaobo Xu, Haoran Zhou, Xiaojie Ma, Wenzhuo Zhu, Hengyu Shi, Hongbin J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify parameters with a higher diagnostic value for early screening of prostate cancer (PCa) at different ages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 294 patients were included and divided into two groups according to the age of patients (≤66 and >66 years). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of total prostate‐specific antigen (TPSA), free PSA (FPSA), (F/T)PSA, PSA density (PSAD), PSA–AV score, the ratio of patients' age to prostate volume (AVR) and (F/T)/PSAD were constructed. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated, and differences in the AUC values among the above‐mentioned parameters were compared. RESULTS: There were 121 patients in the ≤66 years age group (benign prostatic hyperplasia BPH, 103 patients; PCa 18 patients) and 173 patients in the >66 years age group (BPH, 100 patients; PCa, 73 patients). In the ≤66 years age group, the AUC value of AVR for PCa diagnosis was the highest; however, there was no statistically significant difference compared with the AUC values of PSAD and (F/T)/PSAD; compared with TPSA, FPSA, (F/T)PSA and PSA‐AV, the differences were statistically significant. In the >66 years age group, the AUC values of PSAD and PSA–AV for PCa diagnosis were higher than those of TPSA, FPSA, (F/T)PSA and (F/T)/PSAD, and the difference was statistically significant; however, the difference was not statistically significant when compared with the AUC value of AVR. CONCLUSION: In different age groups, screening indices for PCa diagnosis should be selected according to the age of patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8761435/ /pubmed/34816496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24098 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Shan, Jiahao
Liu, Ziyang
Geng, Xinyu
Feng, Yuelong
Yang, Xiaobo
Xu, Haoran
Zhou, Xiaojie
Ma, Wenzhuo
Zhu, Hengyu
Shi, Hongbin
The influence of age on prostate cancer screening index
title The influence of age on prostate cancer screening index
title_full The influence of age on prostate cancer screening index
title_fullStr The influence of age on prostate cancer screening index
title_full_unstemmed The influence of age on prostate cancer screening index
title_short The influence of age on prostate cancer screening index
title_sort influence of age on prostate cancer screening index
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34816496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24098
work_keys_str_mv AT shanjiahao theinfluenceofageonprostatecancerscreeningindex
AT liuziyang theinfluenceofageonprostatecancerscreeningindex
AT gengxinyu theinfluenceofageonprostatecancerscreeningindex
AT fengyuelong theinfluenceofageonprostatecancerscreeningindex
AT yangxiaobo theinfluenceofageonprostatecancerscreeningindex
AT xuhaoran theinfluenceofageonprostatecancerscreeningindex
AT zhouxiaojie theinfluenceofageonprostatecancerscreeningindex
AT mawenzhuo theinfluenceofageonprostatecancerscreeningindex
AT zhuhengyu theinfluenceofageonprostatecancerscreeningindex
AT shihongbin theinfluenceofageonprostatecancerscreeningindex
AT shanjiahao influenceofageonprostatecancerscreeningindex
AT liuziyang influenceofageonprostatecancerscreeningindex
AT gengxinyu influenceofageonprostatecancerscreeningindex
AT fengyuelong influenceofageonprostatecancerscreeningindex
AT yangxiaobo influenceofageonprostatecancerscreeningindex
AT xuhaoran influenceofageonprostatecancerscreeningindex
AT zhouxiaojie influenceofageonprostatecancerscreeningindex
AT mawenzhuo influenceofageonprostatecancerscreeningindex
AT zhuhengyu influenceofageonprostatecancerscreeningindex
AT shihongbin influenceofageonprostatecancerscreeningindex