Cargando…

Combination of artificial intelligence‐based endoscopy and miR148a methylation for gastric indefinite dysplasia diagnosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Gastrointestinal endoscopy and biopsy‐based pathological findings are needed to diagnose early gastric cancer. However, the information of biopsy specimen is limited because of the topical procedure; therefore, pathology doctors sometimes diagnose as gastric indefinite for dyspla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watanabe, Yoshiyuki, Oikawa, Ritsuko, Agawa, Shuhei, Matsuo, Yasumasa, Oda, Ichiro, Futagami, Seiji, Yamamoto, Hiroyuki, Tada, Tomohiro, Itoh, Fumio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34811809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24122
_version_ 1784633535238242304
author Watanabe, Yoshiyuki
Oikawa, Ritsuko
Agawa, Shuhei
Matsuo, Yasumasa
Oda, Ichiro
Futagami, Seiji
Yamamoto, Hiroyuki
Tada, Tomohiro
Itoh, Fumio
author_facet Watanabe, Yoshiyuki
Oikawa, Ritsuko
Agawa, Shuhei
Matsuo, Yasumasa
Oda, Ichiro
Futagami, Seiji
Yamamoto, Hiroyuki
Tada, Tomohiro
Itoh, Fumio
author_sort Watanabe, Yoshiyuki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Gastrointestinal endoscopy and biopsy‐based pathological findings are needed to diagnose early gastric cancer. However, the information of biopsy specimen is limited because of the topical procedure; therefore, pathology doctors sometimes diagnose as gastric indefinite for dysplasia (GIN). METHODS: We compared the accuracy of physician‐performed endoscopy (trainee, n = 3; specialists, n = 3), artificial intelligence (AI)‐based endoscopy, and/or molecular markers (DNA methylation: BARHL2, MINT31, TET1, miR‐148a, miR‐124a‐3, NKX6‐1; mutations: TP53; and microsatellite instability) in diagnosing GIN lesions. We enrolled 24,388 patients who underwent endoscopy, and 71 patients were diagnosed with GIN lesions. Thirty‐two cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in 71 GIN lesions and 32 endoscopically resected tissues were assessed by endoscopists, AI, and molecular markers to identify benign or malignant lesions. RESULTS: The board‐certified endoscopic physicians group showed the highest accuracy in the receiver operative characteristic curve (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.931), followed by a combination of AI and miR148a DNA methylation (AUC: 0.825), and finally trainee endoscopists (AUC: 0.588). CONCLUSION: AI with miR148s DNA methylation‐based diagnosis is a potential modality for diagnosing GIN.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8761468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87614682022-01-20 Combination of artificial intelligence‐based endoscopy and miR148a methylation for gastric indefinite dysplasia diagnosis Watanabe, Yoshiyuki Oikawa, Ritsuko Agawa, Shuhei Matsuo, Yasumasa Oda, Ichiro Futagami, Seiji Yamamoto, Hiroyuki Tada, Tomohiro Itoh, Fumio J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles BACKGROUND AND AIM: Gastrointestinal endoscopy and biopsy‐based pathological findings are needed to diagnose early gastric cancer. However, the information of biopsy specimen is limited because of the topical procedure; therefore, pathology doctors sometimes diagnose as gastric indefinite for dysplasia (GIN). METHODS: We compared the accuracy of physician‐performed endoscopy (trainee, n = 3; specialists, n = 3), artificial intelligence (AI)‐based endoscopy, and/or molecular markers (DNA methylation: BARHL2, MINT31, TET1, miR‐148a, miR‐124a‐3, NKX6‐1; mutations: TP53; and microsatellite instability) in diagnosing GIN lesions. We enrolled 24,388 patients who underwent endoscopy, and 71 patients were diagnosed with GIN lesions. Thirty‐two cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in 71 GIN lesions and 32 endoscopically resected tissues were assessed by endoscopists, AI, and molecular markers to identify benign or malignant lesions. RESULTS: The board‐certified endoscopic physicians group showed the highest accuracy in the receiver operative characteristic curve (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.931), followed by a combination of AI and miR148a DNA methylation (AUC: 0.825), and finally trainee endoscopists (AUC: 0.588). CONCLUSION: AI with miR148s DNA methylation‐based diagnosis is a potential modality for diagnosing GIN. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8761468/ /pubmed/34811809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24122 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Watanabe, Yoshiyuki
Oikawa, Ritsuko
Agawa, Shuhei
Matsuo, Yasumasa
Oda, Ichiro
Futagami, Seiji
Yamamoto, Hiroyuki
Tada, Tomohiro
Itoh, Fumio
Combination of artificial intelligence‐based endoscopy and miR148a methylation for gastric indefinite dysplasia diagnosis
title Combination of artificial intelligence‐based endoscopy and miR148a methylation for gastric indefinite dysplasia diagnosis
title_full Combination of artificial intelligence‐based endoscopy and miR148a methylation for gastric indefinite dysplasia diagnosis
title_fullStr Combination of artificial intelligence‐based endoscopy and miR148a methylation for gastric indefinite dysplasia diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Combination of artificial intelligence‐based endoscopy and miR148a methylation for gastric indefinite dysplasia diagnosis
title_short Combination of artificial intelligence‐based endoscopy and miR148a methylation for gastric indefinite dysplasia diagnosis
title_sort combination of artificial intelligence‐based endoscopy and mir148a methylation for gastric indefinite dysplasia diagnosis
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34811809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24122
work_keys_str_mv AT watanabeyoshiyuki combinationofartificialintelligencebasedendoscopyandmir148amethylationforgastricindefinitedysplasiadiagnosis
AT oikawaritsuko combinationofartificialintelligencebasedendoscopyandmir148amethylationforgastricindefinitedysplasiadiagnosis
AT agawashuhei combinationofartificialintelligencebasedendoscopyandmir148amethylationforgastricindefinitedysplasiadiagnosis
AT matsuoyasumasa combinationofartificialintelligencebasedendoscopyandmir148amethylationforgastricindefinitedysplasiadiagnosis
AT odaichiro combinationofartificialintelligencebasedendoscopyandmir148amethylationforgastricindefinitedysplasiadiagnosis
AT futagamiseiji combinationofartificialintelligencebasedendoscopyandmir148amethylationforgastricindefinitedysplasiadiagnosis
AT yamamotohiroyuki combinationofartificialintelligencebasedendoscopyandmir148amethylationforgastricindefinitedysplasiadiagnosis
AT tadatomohiro combinationofartificialintelligencebasedendoscopyandmir148amethylationforgastricindefinitedysplasiadiagnosis
AT itohfumio combinationofartificialintelligencebasedendoscopyandmir148amethylationforgastricindefinitedysplasiadiagnosis