Cargando…

Projected New-Onset Cardiovascular Disease by Socioeconomic Group in Australia

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic status has an important effect on cardiovascular disease (CVD). Data on the economic implications of CVD by socioeconomic status are needed to inform healthcare planning. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to project new-onset CVD and related health economic outcomes in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hastings, Kaitlyn, Marquina, Clara, Morton, Jedidiah, Abushanab, Dina, Berkovic, Danielle, Talic, Stella, Zomer, Ella, Liew, Danny, Ademi, Zanfina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35037191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-021-01127-1
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic status has an important effect on cardiovascular disease (CVD). Data on the economic implications of CVD by socioeconomic status are needed to inform healthcare planning. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to project new-onset CVD and related health economic outcomes in Australia by socioeconomic status from 2021 to 2030. METHODS: A dynamic population model was built to project annual new-onset CVD by socioeconomic quintile in Australians aged 40–79 years from 2021 to 2030. Cardiovascular risk was estimated using the Pooled Cohort Equation (PCE) from Australian-specific data, stratified for each socioeconomic quintile. The model projected years of life lived, quality- adjusted life-years (QALYs), acute healthcare medical costs, and productivity losses due to new-onset CVD. All outcomes were discounted by 5% annually. RESULTS: PCE estimates showed that 8.4% of people in the most disadvantaged quintile were at high risk of CVD, compared with 3.7% in the least disadvantaged quintile (p < 0.001). From 2021 to 2030, the model projected 32% more cardiovascular events in the most disadvantaged quintile compared with the least disadvantaged (127,070 in SE 1 vs. 96,222 in SE 5). Acute healthcare costs in the most disadvantaged quintile were Australian dollars (AU$) 183 million higher than the least disadvantaged, and the difference in productivity costs was AU$959 million. Removing the equity gap (by applying the cardiovascular risk from the least disadvantaged quintile to the whole population) would prevent 114,822 cardiovascular events and save AU$704 million of healthcare costs and AU$3844 million of lost earnings over the next 10 years. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight the pressing need to implement primary prevention interventions to reduce cardiovascular health inequity. This model provides a platform to incorporate socioeconomic status into health economic models by estimating which interventions are likely to yield more benefits in each socioeconomic quintile. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40273-021-01127-1.