Cargando…

Surgical Outcomes of Vaginal or Cervical Melanoma

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of radical resection compared with non-radical resection for vaginal or cervical melanoma. Methods: We retrospectively analysed the clinical data of post-operative patients with primary lower genital tract melanoma hospitalised at Peking University Cancer Hos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tian, Hui, Wang, Xuan, Lian, Bin, Si, Lu, Gao, Min, Zheng, Hong, Chi, Zhihong, Kong, Yan, Mao, Lili, Bai, Xue, Tang, Bixia, Yan, Xieqiao, Li, Siming, Zhou, Li, Dai, Jie, Sun, Yangchun, Wu, Lingying, Guo, Jun, Cui, Chuanliang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35047550
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.771160
_version_ 1784633615051653120
author Tian, Hui
Wang, Xuan
Lian, Bin
Si, Lu
Gao, Min
Zheng, Hong
Chi, Zhihong
Kong, Yan
Mao, Lili
Bai, Xue
Tang, Bixia
Yan, Xieqiao
Li, Siming
Zhou, Li
Dai, Jie
Sun, Yangchun
Wu, Lingying
Guo, Jun
Cui, Chuanliang
author_facet Tian, Hui
Wang, Xuan
Lian, Bin
Si, Lu
Gao, Min
Zheng, Hong
Chi, Zhihong
Kong, Yan
Mao, Lili
Bai, Xue
Tang, Bixia
Yan, Xieqiao
Li, Siming
Zhou, Li
Dai, Jie
Sun, Yangchun
Wu, Lingying
Guo, Jun
Cui, Chuanliang
author_sort Tian, Hui
collection PubMed
description Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of radical resection compared with non-radical resection for vaginal or cervical melanoma. Methods: We retrospectively analysed the clinical data of post-operative patients with primary lower genital tract melanoma hospitalised at Peking University Cancer Hospital between Jan 2014 and Dec 2020. The study endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan–Meier method-plotted survival curves and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify the factors associated with RFS and OS, and to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Results: A total of 80 patients were included. Thirty-one patients had received non-radical resection, and 49 patients had received radical resection. The median patient age was 55.5 (IQR 45.3–60.0) years. Sixty-two (77.5%) patients had vaginal melanoma. Sixty-four patients (80.0%) had received post-operative adjuvant therapy. The median follow-up time was 36.0 months (95% CI 10.1–62.1 months). Sixty-four patients developed recurrence, and 44 patients died. The median RFS (mRFS) was 6.0 months (95% CI 3.4–8.6 m), and the RFS for the radical resection group was longer than that for the non-radical resection group (9.5 vs. 5.3 m), with no significant difference (P > 0.05). The median OS (mOS) was 25.9 months (95% CI 14.4–37.4 m). The mOS was 24.6 months (95% CI 10.3–38.9 m) and 25.9 months (95% CI 10.9–40.9 m) in the non-radical resection group and the radical resection group, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that surgical approach, infiltration depth of the tumour, lymph node metastasis, and post-operative adjuvant therapy were independent risk factors for RFS and that post-operative adjuvant therapy was an independent risk factor for OS. Conclusion: By performing multivariate analysis, which corrected for potential confounding factors, we identified surgical procedures that were associated with RFS, and we found that RFS and OS in patients with vaginal melanoma and cervical melanoma benefitted from post-operative adjuvant therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8761811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87618112022-01-18 Surgical Outcomes of Vaginal or Cervical Melanoma Tian, Hui Wang, Xuan Lian, Bin Si, Lu Gao, Min Zheng, Hong Chi, Zhihong Kong, Yan Mao, Lili Bai, Xue Tang, Bixia Yan, Xieqiao Li, Siming Zhou, Li Dai, Jie Sun, Yangchun Wu, Lingying Guo, Jun Cui, Chuanliang Front Surg Surgery Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of radical resection compared with non-radical resection for vaginal or cervical melanoma. Methods: We retrospectively analysed the clinical data of post-operative patients with primary lower genital tract melanoma hospitalised at Peking University Cancer Hospital between Jan 2014 and Dec 2020. The study endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan–Meier method-plotted survival curves and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify the factors associated with RFS and OS, and to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Results: A total of 80 patients were included. Thirty-one patients had received non-radical resection, and 49 patients had received radical resection. The median patient age was 55.5 (IQR 45.3–60.0) years. Sixty-two (77.5%) patients had vaginal melanoma. Sixty-four patients (80.0%) had received post-operative adjuvant therapy. The median follow-up time was 36.0 months (95% CI 10.1–62.1 months). Sixty-four patients developed recurrence, and 44 patients died. The median RFS (mRFS) was 6.0 months (95% CI 3.4–8.6 m), and the RFS for the radical resection group was longer than that for the non-radical resection group (9.5 vs. 5.3 m), with no significant difference (P > 0.05). The median OS (mOS) was 25.9 months (95% CI 14.4–37.4 m). The mOS was 24.6 months (95% CI 10.3–38.9 m) and 25.9 months (95% CI 10.9–40.9 m) in the non-radical resection group and the radical resection group, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that surgical approach, infiltration depth of the tumour, lymph node metastasis, and post-operative adjuvant therapy were independent risk factors for RFS and that post-operative adjuvant therapy was an independent risk factor for OS. Conclusion: By performing multivariate analysis, which corrected for potential confounding factors, we identified surgical procedures that were associated with RFS, and we found that RFS and OS in patients with vaginal melanoma and cervical melanoma benefitted from post-operative adjuvant therapy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8761811/ /pubmed/35047550 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.771160 Text en Copyright © 2022 Tian, Wang, Lian, Si, Gao, Zheng, Chi, Kong, Mao, Bai, Tang, Yan, Li, Zhou, Dai, Sun, Wu, Guo and Cui. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Tian, Hui
Wang, Xuan
Lian, Bin
Si, Lu
Gao, Min
Zheng, Hong
Chi, Zhihong
Kong, Yan
Mao, Lili
Bai, Xue
Tang, Bixia
Yan, Xieqiao
Li, Siming
Zhou, Li
Dai, Jie
Sun, Yangchun
Wu, Lingying
Guo, Jun
Cui, Chuanliang
Surgical Outcomes of Vaginal or Cervical Melanoma
title Surgical Outcomes of Vaginal or Cervical Melanoma
title_full Surgical Outcomes of Vaginal or Cervical Melanoma
title_fullStr Surgical Outcomes of Vaginal or Cervical Melanoma
title_full_unstemmed Surgical Outcomes of Vaginal or Cervical Melanoma
title_short Surgical Outcomes of Vaginal or Cervical Melanoma
title_sort surgical outcomes of vaginal or cervical melanoma
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35047550
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.771160
work_keys_str_mv AT tianhui surgicaloutcomesofvaginalorcervicalmelanoma
AT wangxuan surgicaloutcomesofvaginalorcervicalmelanoma
AT lianbin surgicaloutcomesofvaginalorcervicalmelanoma
AT silu surgicaloutcomesofvaginalorcervicalmelanoma
AT gaomin surgicaloutcomesofvaginalorcervicalmelanoma
AT zhenghong surgicaloutcomesofvaginalorcervicalmelanoma
AT chizhihong surgicaloutcomesofvaginalorcervicalmelanoma
AT kongyan surgicaloutcomesofvaginalorcervicalmelanoma
AT maolili surgicaloutcomesofvaginalorcervicalmelanoma
AT baixue surgicaloutcomesofvaginalorcervicalmelanoma
AT tangbixia surgicaloutcomesofvaginalorcervicalmelanoma
AT yanxieqiao surgicaloutcomesofvaginalorcervicalmelanoma
AT lisiming surgicaloutcomesofvaginalorcervicalmelanoma
AT zhouli surgicaloutcomesofvaginalorcervicalmelanoma
AT daijie surgicaloutcomesofvaginalorcervicalmelanoma
AT sunyangchun surgicaloutcomesofvaginalorcervicalmelanoma
AT wulingying surgicaloutcomesofvaginalorcervicalmelanoma
AT guojun surgicaloutcomesofvaginalorcervicalmelanoma
AT cuichuanliang surgicaloutcomesofvaginalorcervicalmelanoma