Cargando…

A Bibliometric Analysis of Endoscopic Sedation Research: 2001–2020

Background and Aims: To evaluate endoscopic sedation research and predict research hot spots both quantitatively and qualitatively using bibliometric analysis. Methods: We extracted relevant publications from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) on 13 December 2020. We examined the retrieved d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qin, Yi, Chen, Sifan, Zhang, Yuanyuan, Liu, Wanfeng, Lin, Yuxuan, Chi, Xiaoying, Chen, Xuemei, Yu, Zhangjie, Su, Diansan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35047526
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.775495
_version_ 1784633615302262784
author Qin, Yi
Chen, Sifan
Zhang, Yuanyuan
Liu, Wanfeng
Lin, Yuxuan
Chi, Xiaoying
Chen, Xuemei
Yu, Zhangjie
Su, Diansan
author_facet Qin, Yi
Chen, Sifan
Zhang, Yuanyuan
Liu, Wanfeng
Lin, Yuxuan
Chi, Xiaoying
Chen, Xuemei
Yu, Zhangjie
Su, Diansan
author_sort Qin, Yi
collection PubMed
description Background and Aims: To evaluate endoscopic sedation research and predict research hot spots both quantitatively and qualitatively using bibliometric analysis. Methods: We extracted relevant publications from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) on 13 December 2020. We examined the retrieved data by bibliometric analysis (e.g., co-cited and cluster analysis, keyword co-occurrence) using the software CiteSpace and VOSviewer and the website of bibliometrics, the Online Analysis Platform of Literature Metrology (http://bibliometric.com/), to analyse and predict the trends and hot spots in this field. Main Results: We identified 2,879 articles and reviews on endoscopic sedation published between 2001 and 2020. Although the overall trend is increasing, with slight fluctuation in some years, there were significant increases in 2007 and 2012. In respect of the contributions on endoscopic sedation research, the United States (US) had the greatest number of publications, and it was followed by Japan and China. In addition, collaboration network analysis revealed that the most frequent collaboration was between the US and China. Six of the top ten most prolific research institutions were located in the US. The most publications on endoscopic sedation research in the past two decades were found primarily in journals on gastroenterology and hepatology. Keyword co-occurrence and co-citation cluster analysis revealed the most popular terms relating to endoscopic sedation in the manner of cluster labels; these included patient anxiety, tolerance, ketamine, propofol, hypoxia, nursing shortage, endoscopic ultrasonography, colorectal cancer, carbon dioxide insufflation, and water exchange (WE). Keyword burst detection suggested that propofol sedation, adverse event, adenoma detection rate (ADR), hypoxemia, and obesity were newly-emergent research hot spots. Conclusions: Our findings showed that hypoxia, adverse event, and ADR, along with conscious sedation and propofol sedation, have been foci of endoscopic sedation research over the past 20 years. The research focus has shifted from sedative drugs to sedative complications and endoscopy quality control, which means that there will be higher requirements and standards for sedative quality and endoscopy quality in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8761812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87618122022-01-18 A Bibliometric Analysis of Endoscopic Sedation Research: 2001–2020 Qin, Yi Chen, Sifan Zhang, Yuanyuan Liu, Wanfeng Lin, Yuxuan Chi, Xiaoying Chen, Xuemei Yu, Zhangjie Su, Diansan Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Background and Aims: To evaluate endoscopic sedation research and predict research hot spots both quantitatively and qualitatively using bibliometric analysis. Methods: We extracted relevant publications from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) on 13 December 2020. We examined the retrieved data by bibliometric analysis (e.g., co-cited and cluster analysis, keyword co-occurrence) using the software CiteSpace and VOSviewer and the website of bibliometrics, the Online Analysis Platform of Literature Metrology (http://bibliometric.com/), to analyse and predict the trends and hot spots in this field. Main Results: We identified 2,879 articles and reviews on endoscopic sedation published between 2001 and 2020. Although the overall trend is increasing, with slight fluctuation in some years, there were significant increases in 2007 and 2012. In respect of the contributions on endoscopic sedation research, the United States (US) had the greatest number of publications, and it was followed by Japan and China. In addition, collaboration network analysis revealed that the most frequent collaboration was between the US and China. Six of the top ten most prolific research institutions were located in the US. The most publications on endoscopic sedation research in the past two decades were found primarily in journals on gastroenterology and hepatology. Keyword co-occurrence and co-citation cluster analysis revealed the most popular terms relating to endoscopic sedation in the manner of cluster labels; these included patient anxiety, tolerance, ketamine, propofol, hypoxia, nursing shortage, endoscopic ultrasonography, colorectal cancer, carbon dioxide insufflation, and water exchange (WE). Keyword burst detection suggested that propofol sedation, adverse event, adenoma detection rate (ADR), hypoxemia, and obesity were newly-emergent research hot spots. Conclusions: Our findings showed that hypoxia, adverse event, and ADR, along with conscious sedation and propofol sedation, have been foci of endoscopic sedation research over the past 20 years. The research focus has shifted from sedative drugs to sedative complications and endoscopy quality control, which means that there will be higher requirements and standards for sedative quality and endoscopy quality in the future. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8761812/ /pubmed/35047526 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.775495 Text en Copyright © 2022 Qin, Chen, Zhang, Liu, Lin, Chi, Chen, Yu and Su. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Qin, Yi
Chen, Sifan
Zhang, Yuanyuan
Liu, Wanfeng
Lin, Yuxuan
Chi, Xiaoying
Chen, Xuemei
Yu, Zhangjie
Su, Diansan
A Bibliometric Analysis of Endoscopic Sedation Research: 2001–2020
title A Bibliometric Analysis of Endoscopic Sedation Research: 2001–2020
title_full A Bibliometric Analysis of Endoscopic Sedation Research: 2001–2020
title_fullStr A Bibliometric Analysis of Endoscopic Sedation Research: 2001–2020
title_full_unstemmed A Bibliometric Analysis of Endoscopic Sedation Research: 2001–2020
title_short A Bibliometric Analysis of Endoscopic Sedation Research: 2001–2020
title_sort bibliometric analysis of endoscopic sedation research: 2001–2020
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35047526
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.775495
work_keys_str_mv AT qinyi abibliometricanalysisofendoscopicsedationresearch20012020
AT chensifan abibliometricanalysisofendoscopicsedationresearch20012020
AT zhangyuanyuan abibliometricanalysisofendoscopicsedationresearch20012020
AT liuwanfeng abibliometricanalysisofendoscopicsedationresearch20012020
AT linyuxuan abibliometricanalysisofendoscopicsedationresearch20012020
AT chixiaoying abibliometricanalysisofendoscopicsedationresearch20012020
AT chenxuemei abibliometricanalysisofendoscopicsedationresearch20012020
AT yuzhangjie abibliometricanalysisofendoscopicsedationresearch20012020
AT sudiansan abibliometricanalysisofendoscopicsedationresearch20012020
AT qinyi bibliometricanalysisofendoscopicsedationresearch20012020
AT chensifan bibliometricanalysisofendoscopicsedationresearch20012020
AT zhangyuanyuan bibliometricanalysisofendoscopicsedationresearch20012020
AT liuwanfeng bibliometricanalysisofendoscopicsedationresearch20012020
AT linyuxuan bibliometricanalysisofendoscopicsedationresearch20012020
AT chixiaoying bibliometricanalysisofendoscopicsedationresearch20012020
AT chenxuemei bibliometricanalysisofendoscopicsedationresearch20012020
AT yuzhangjie bibliometricanalysisofendoscopicsedationresearch20012020
AT sudiansan bibliometricanalysisofendoscopicsedationresearch20012020