Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing in patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicentre REVITA-2 feasibility trial
OBJECTIVE: Hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing (DMR) is a safe, outpatient endoscopic procedure. REVITA-2, a double-blind, superiority randomised controlled trial, investigates safety and efficacy of DMR using the single catheter Revita system (Revita DMR (catheter and system)), on glycaemic c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33597157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323608 |
_version_ | 1784633662801707008 |
---|---|
author | Mingrone, Geltrude van Baar, Annieke CG Devière, Jacques Hopkins, David Moura, Eduardo Cercato, Cintia Rajagopalan, Harith Lopez-Talavera, Juan Carlos White, Kelly Bhambhani, Vijeta Costamagna, Guido Haidry, Rehan Grecco, Eduardo Galvao Neto, Manoel Aithal, Guruprasad Repici, Alessandro Hayee, Bu'Hussain Haji, Amyn Morris, A John Bisschops, Raf Chouhan, Manil D Sakai, Naomi S Bhatt, Deepak L Sanyal, Arun J Bergman, J J G H M |
author_facet | Mingrone, Geltrude van Baar, Annieke CG Devière, Jacques Hopkins, David Moura, Eduardo Cercato, Cintia Rajagopalan, Harith Lopez-Talavera, Juan Carlos White, Kelly Bhambhani, Vijeta Costamagna, Guido Haidry, Rehan Grecco, Eduardo Galvao Neto, Manoel Aithal, Guruprasad Repici, Alessandro Hayee, Bu'Hussain Haji, Amyn Morris, A John Bisschops, Raf Chouhan, Manil D Sakai, Naomi S Bhatt, Deepak L Sanyal, Arun J Bergman, J J G H M |
author_sort | Mingrone, Geltrude |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing (DMR) is a safe, outpatient endoscopic procedure. REVITA-2, a double-blind, superiority randomised controlled trial, investigates safety and efficacy of DMR using the single catheter Revita system (Revita DMR (catheter and system)), on glycaemic control and liver fat content in type 2 diabetes (T2D). DESIGN: Eligible patients (haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 59–86 mmol/mol, body mass index≥24 and ≤40 kg/m(2), fasting insulin >48.6 pmol/L, ≥1 oral antidiabetic medication) enrolled in Europe and Brazil. Primary endpoints were safety, change from baseline in HbA1c at 24 weeks, and liver MRI proton-density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) at 12 weeks. RESULTS: Overall mITT (DMR n=56; sham n=52), 24 weeks post DMR, median (IQR) HbA1c change was −10.4 (18.6) mmol/mol in DMR group versus −7.1 (16.4) mmol/mol in sham group (p=0.147). In patients with baseline liver MRI-PDFF >5% (DMR n=48; sham n=43), 12-week post-DMR liver-fat change was −5.4 (5.6)% in DMR group versus −2.9 (6.2)% in sham group (p=0.096). Results from prespecified interaction testing and clinical parameter assessment showed heterogeneity between European (DMR n=39; sham n=37) and Brazilian (DMR n=17; sham n=16) populations (p=0.063); therefore, results were stratified by region. In European mITT, 24 weeks post DMR, median (IQR) HbA1c change was –6.6 mmol/mol (17.5 mmol/mol) versus –3.3 mmol/mol (10.9 mmol/mol) post-sham (p=0.033); 12-week post-DMR liver-fat change was –5.4% (6.1%) versus –2.2% (4.3%) post-sham (p=0.035). Brazilian mITT results trended towards DMR benefit in HbA1c, but not liver fat, in context of a large sham effect. In overall PP, patients with high baseline fasting plasma glucose ((FPG)≥10 mmol/L) had significantly greater reductions in HbA1c post-DMR versus sham (p=0.002). Most adverse events were mild and transient. CONCLUSIONS: DMR is safe and exerts beneficial disease-modifying metabolic effects in T2D with or without non-alcoholic liver disease, particularly in patients with high FPG. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02879383 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8761999 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87619992022-01-26 Safety and efficacy of hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing in patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicentre REVITA-2 feasibility trial Mingrone, Geltrude van Baar, Annieke CG Devière, Jacques Hopkins, David Moura, Eduardo Cercato, Cintia Rajagopalan, Harith Lopez-Talavera, Juan Carlos White, Kelly Bhambhani, Vijeta Costamagna, Guido Haidry, Rehan Grecco, Eduardo Galvao Neto, Manoel Aithal, Guruprasad Repici, Alessandro Hayee, Bu'Hussain Haji, Amyn Morris, A John Bisschops, Raf Chouhan, Manil D Sakai, Naomi S Bhatt, Deepak L Sanyal, Arun J Bergman, J J G H M Gut Gastroduodenal OBJECTIVE: Hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing (DMR) is a safe, outpatient endoscopic procedure. REVITA-2, a double-blind, superiority randomised controlled trial, investigates safety and efficacy of DMR using the single catheter Revita system (Revita DMR (catheter and system)), on glycaemic control and liver fat content in type 2 diabetes (T2D). DESIGN: Eligible patients (haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 59–86 mmol/mol, body mass index≥24 and ≤40 kg/m(2), fasting insulin >48.6 pmol/L, ≥1 oral antidiabetic medication) enrolled in Europe and Brazil. Primary endpoints were safety, change from baseline in HbA1c at 24 weeks, and liver MRI proton-density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) at 12 weeks. RESULTS: Overall mITT (DMR n=56; sham n=52), 24 weeks post DMR, median (IQR) HbA1c change was −10.4 (18.6) mmol/mol in DMR group versus −7.1 (16.4) mmol/mol in sham group (p=0.147). In patients with baseline liver MRI-PDFF >5% (DMR n=48; sham n=43), 12-week post-DMR liver-fat change was −5.4 (5.6)% in DMR group versus −2.9 (6.2)% in sham group (p=0.096). Results from prespecified interaction testing and clinical parameter assessment showed heterogeneity between European (DMR n=39; sham n=37) and Brazilian (DMR n=17; sham n=16) populations (p=0.063); therefore, results were stratified by region. In European mITT, 24 weeks post DMR, median (IQR) HbA1c change was –6.6 mmol/mol (17.5 mmol/mol) versus –3.3 mmol/mol (10.9 mmol/mol) post-sham (p=0.033); 12-week post-DMR liver-fat change was –5.4% (6.1%) versus –2.2% (4.3%) post-sham (p=0.035). Brazilian mITT results trended towards DMR benefit in HbA1c, but not liver fat, in context of a large sham effect. In overall PP, patients with high baseline fasting plasma glucose ((FPG)≥10 mmol/L) had significantly greater reductions in HbA1c post-DMR versus sham (p=0.002). Most adverse events were mild and transient. CONCLUSIONS: DMR is safe and exerts beneficial disease-modifying metabolic effects in T2D with or without non-alcoholic liver disease, particularly in patients with high FPG. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02879383 BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02 2021-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8761999/ /pubmed/33597157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323608 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Gastroduodenal Mingrone, Geltrude van Baar, Annieke CG Devière, Jacques Hopkins, David Moura, Eduardo Cercato, Cintia Rajagopalan, Harith Lopez-Talavera, Juan Carlos White, Kelly Bhambhani, Vijeta Costamagna, Guido Haidry, Rehan Grecco, Eduardo Galvao Neto, Manoel Aithal, Guruprasad Repici, Alessandro Hayee, Bu'Hussain Haji, Amyn Morris, A John Bisschops, Raf Chouhan, Manil D Sakai, Naomi S Bhatt, Deepak L Sanyal, Arun J Bergman, J J G H M Safety and efficacy of hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing in patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicentre REVITA-2 feasibility trial |
title | Safety and efficacy of hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing in patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicentre REVITA-2 feasibility trial |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing in patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicentre REVITA-2 feasibility trial |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing in patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicentre REVITA-2 feasibility trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing in patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicentre REVITA-2 feasibility trial |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing in patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicentre REVITA-2 feasibility trial |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing in patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicentre revita-2 feasibility trial |
topic | Gastroduodenal |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33597157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323608 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mingronegeltrude safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT vanbaaranniekecg safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT devierejacques safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT hopkinsdavid safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT mouraeduardo safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT cercatocintia safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT rajagopalanharith safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT lopeztalaverajuancarlos safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT whitekelly safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT bhambhanivijeta safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT costamagnaguido safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT haidryrehan safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT greccoeduardo safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT galvaonetomanoel safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT aithalguruprasad safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT repicialessandro safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT hayeebuhussain safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT hajiamyn safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT morrisajohn safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT bisschopsraf safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT chouhanmanild safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT sakainaomis safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT bhattdeepakl safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT sanyalarunj safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT bergmanjjghm safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial AT safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial |