Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing in patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicentre REVITA-2 feasibility trial

OBJECTIVE: Hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing (DMR) is a safe, outpatient endoscopic procedure. REVITA-2, a double-blind, superiority randomised controlled trial, investigates safety and efficacy of DMR using the single catheter Revita system (Revita DMR (catheter and system)), on glycaemic c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mingrone, Geltrude, van Baar, Annieke CG, Devière, Jacques, Hopkins, David, Moura, Eduardo, Cercato, Cintia, Rajagopalan, Harith, Lopez-Talavera, Juan Carlos, White, Kelly, Bhambhani, Vijeta, Costamagna, Guido, Haidry, Rehan, Grecco, Eduardo, Galvao Neto, Manoel, Aithal, Guruprasad, Repici, Alessandro, Hayee, Bu'Hussain, Haji, Amyn, Morris, A John, Bisschops, Raf, Chouhan, Manil D, Sakai, Naomi S, Bhatt, Deepak L, Sanyal, Arun J, Bergman, J J G H M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33597157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323608
_version_ 1784633662801707008
author Mingrone, Geltrude
van Baar, Annieke CG
Devière, Jacques
Hopkins, David
Moura, Eduardo
Cercato, Cintia
Rajagopalan, Harith
Lopez-Talavera, Juan Carlos
White, Kelly
Bhambhani, Vijeta
Costamagna, Guido
Haidry, Rehan
Grecco, Eduardo
Galvao Neto, Manoel
Aithal, Guruprasad
Repici, Alessandro
Hayee, Bu'Hussain
Haji, Amyn
Morris, A John
Bisschops, Raf
Chouhan, Manil D
Sakai, Naomi S
Bhatt, Deepak L
Sanyal, Arun J
Bergman, J J G H M
author_facet Mingrone, Geltrude
van Baar, Annieke CG
Devière, Jacques
Hopkins, David
Moura, Eduardo
Cercato, Cintia
Rajagopalan, Harith
Lopez-Talavera, Juan Carlos
White, Kelly
Bhambhani, Vijeta
Costamagna, Guido
Haidry, Rehan
Grecco, Eduardo
Galvao Neto, Manoel
Aithal, Guruprasad
Repici, Alessandro
Hayee, Bu'Hussain
Haji, Amyn
Morris, A John
Bisschops, Raf
Chouhan, Manil D
Sakai, Naomi S
Bhatt, Deepak L
Sanyal, Arun J
Bergman, J J G H M
author_sort Mingrone, Geltrude
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing (DMR) is a safe, outpatient endoscopic procedure. REVITA-2, a double-blind, superiority randomised controlled trial, investigates safety and efficacy of DMR using the single catheter Revita system (Revita DMR (catheter and system)), on glycaemic control and liver fat content in type 2 diabetes (T2D). DESIGN: Eligible patients (haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 59–86 mmol/mol, body mass index≥24 and ≤40 kg/m(2), fasting insulin >48.6 pmol/L, ≥1 oral antidiabetic medication) enrolled in Europe and Brazil. Primary endpoints were safety, change from baseline in HbA1c at 24 weeks, and liver MRI proton-density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) at 12 weeks. RESULTS: Overall mITT (DMR n=56; sham n=52), 24 weeks post DMR, median (IQR) HbA1c change was −10.4 (18.6) mmol/mol in DMR group versus −7.1 (16.4) mmol/mol in sham group (p=0.147). In patients with baseline liver MRI-PDFF >5% (DMR n=48; sham n=43), 12-week post-DMR liver-fat change was −5.4 (5.6)% in DMR group versus −2.9 (6.2)% in sham group (p=0.096). Results from prespecified interaction testing and clinical parameter assessment showed heterogeneity between European (DMR n=39; sham n=37) and Brazilian (DMR n=17; sham n=16) populations (p=0.063); therefore, results were stratified by region. In European mITT, 24 weeks post DMR, median (IQR) HbA1c change was –6.6 mmol/mol (17.5 mmol/mol) versus –3.3 mmol/mol (10.9 mmol/mol) post-sham (p=0.033); 12-week post-DMR liver-fat change was –5.4% (6.1%) versus –2.2% (4.3%) post-sham (p=0.035). Brazilian mITT results trended towards DMR benefit in HbA1c, but not liver fat, in context of a large sham effect. In overall PP, patients with high baseline fasting plasma glucose ((FPG)≥10 mmol/L) had significantly greater reductions in HbA1c post-DMR versus sham (p=0.002). Most adverse events were mild and transient. CONCLUSIONS: DMR is safe and exerts beneficial disease-modifying metabolic effects in T2D with or without non-alcoholic liver disease, particularly in patients with high FPG. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02879383
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8761999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87619992022-01-26 Safety and efficacy of hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing in patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicentre REVITA-2 feasibility trial Mingrone, Geltrude van Baar, Annieke CG Devière, Jacques Hopkins, David Moura, Eduardo Cercato, Cintia Rajagopalan, Harith Lopez-Talavera, Juan Carlos White, Kelly Bhambhani, Vijeta Costamagna, Guido Haidry, Rehan Grecco, Eduardo Galvao Neto, Manoel Aithal, Guruprasad Repici, Alessandro Hayee, Bu'Hussain Haji, Amyn Morris, A John Bisschops, Raf Chouhan, Manil D Sakai, Naomi S Bhatt, Deepak L Sanyal, Arun J Bergman, J J G H M Gut Gastroduodenal OBJECTIVE: Hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing (DMR) is a safe, outpatient endoscopic procedure. REVITA-2, a double-blind, superiority randomised controlled trial, investigates safety and efficacy of DMR using the single catheter Revita system (Revita DMR (catheter and system)), on glycaemic control and liver fat content in type 2 diabetes (T2D). DESIGN: Eligible patients (haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 59–86 mmol/mol, body mass index≥24 and ≤40 kg/m(2), fasting insulin >48.6 pmol/L, ≥1 oral antidiabetic medication) enrolled in Europe and Brazil. Primary endpoints were safety, change from baseline in HbA1c at 24 weeks, and liver MRI proton-density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) at 12 weeks. RESULTS: Overall mITT (DMR n=56; sham n=52), 24 weeks post DMR, median (IQR) HbA1c change was −10.4 (18.6) mmol/mol in DMR group versus −7.1 (16.4) mmol/mol in sham group (p=0.147). In patients with baseline liver MRI-PDFF >5% (DMR n=48; sham n=43), 12-week post-DMR liver-fat change was −5.4 (5.6)% in DMR group versus −2.9 (6.2)% in sham group (p=0.096). Results from prespecified interaction testing and clinical parameter assessment showed heterogeneity between European (DMR n=39; sham n=37) and Brazilian (DMR n=17; sham n=16) populations (p=0.063); therefore, results were stratified by region. In European mITT, 24 weeks post DMR, median (IQR) HbA1c change was –6.6 mmol/mol (17.5 mmol/mol) versus –3.3 mmol/mol (10.9 mmol/mol) post-sham (p=0.033); 12-week post-DMR liver-fat change was –5.4% (6.1%) versus –2.2% (4.3%) post-sham (p=0.035). Brazilian mITT results trended towards DMR benefit in HbA1c, but not liver fat, in context of a large sham effect. In overall PP, patients with high baseline fasting plasma glucose ((FPG)≥10 mmol/L) had significantly greater reductions in HbA1c post-DMR versus sham (p=0.002). Most adverse events were mild and transient. CONCLUSIONS: DMR is safe and exerts beneficial disease-modifying metabolic effects in T2D with or without non-alcoholic liver disease, particularly in patients with high FPG. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02879383 BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02 2021-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8761999/ /pubmed/33597157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323608 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Gastroduodenal
Mingrone, Geltrude
van Baar, Annieke CG
Devière, Jacques
Hopkins, David
Moura, Eduardo
Cercato, Cintia
Rajagopalan, Harith
Lopez-Talavera, Juan Carlos
White, Kelly
Bhambhani, Vijeta
Costamagna, Guido
Haidry, Rehan
Grecco, Eduardo
Galvao Neto, Manoel
Aithal, Guruprasad
Repici, Alessandro
Hayee, Bu'Hussain
Haji, Amyn
Morris, A John
Bisschops, Raf
Chouhan, Manil D
Sakai, Naomi S
Bhatt, Deepak L
Sanyal, Arun J
Bergman, J J G H M
Safety and efficacy of hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing in patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicentre REVITA-2 feasibility trial
title Safety and efficacy of hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing in patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicentre REVITA-2 feasibility trial
title_full Safety and efficacy of hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing in patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicentre REVITA-2 feasibility trial
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing in patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicentre REVITA-2 feasibility trial
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing in patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicentre REVITA-2 feasibility trial
title_short Safety and efficacy of hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing in patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicentre REVITA-2 feasibility trial
title_sort safety and efficacy of hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing in patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicentre revita-2 feasibility trial
topic Gastroduodenal
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33597157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323608
work_keys_str_mv AT mingronegeltrude safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT vanbaaranniekecg safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT devierejacques safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT hopkinsdavid safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT mouraeduardo safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT cercatocintia safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT rajagopalanharith safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT lopeztalaverajuancarlos safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT whitekelly safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT bhambhanivijeta safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT costamagnaguido safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT haidryrehan safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT greccoeduardo safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT galvaonetomanoel safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT aithalguruprasad safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT repicialessandro safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT hayeebuhussain safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT hajiamyn safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT morrisajohn safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT bisschopsraf safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT chouhanmanild safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT sakainaomis safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT bhattdeepakl safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT sanyalarunj safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT bergmanjjghm safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial
AT safetyandefficacyofhydrothermalduodenalmucosalresurfacinginpatientswithtype2diabetestherandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledmulticentrerevita2feasibilitytrial