Cargando…

The Safety and Efficacy of Botanicals with Nootropic Effects

Recent estimates for the global brain health supplement category, i.e. nootropic market size, will grow to nearly $5.8 billion by 2023. Overall, nearly one-quarter (23%) of adults currently take a supplement to maintain or improve brain health or delay and reverse dementia. Not surprisingly, the use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roe, Amy L., Venkataraman, Arvind
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Science Publishers 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8762178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34315377
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570159X19666210726150432
_version_ 1784633701803491328
author Roe, Amy L.
Venkataraman, Arvind
author_facet Roe, Amy L.
Venkataraman, Arvind
author_sort Roe, Amy L.
collection PubMed
description Recent estimates for the global brain health supplement category, i.e. nootropic market size, will grow to nearly $5.8 billion by 2023. Overall, nearly one-quarter (23%) of adults currently take a supplement to maintain or improve brain health or delay and reverse dementia. Not surprisingly, the use of such supplements increases with age - more than one-third of the oldest generation (ages 74 and older) takes a supplement for brain health. This widespread use is being driven by a strong desire both in the younger and older generations to enhance cognitive performance and achieve healthy aging. The most prevalent botanicals currently dominating the nootropic marketplace include Gingko biloba, American ginseng, and Bacopa monnieri. However, other botanicals that affect stress, focus, attention, and sleep have also been procured by dietary supplement companies developing products for improving both, short and long-term brain health. This review focuses on efficacy data for neuroactive botanicals targeted at improving cognitive function, stress reduction, memory, mood, attention, concentration, focus, and alertness, including Bacopa monnieri, Ginkgo biloba, Holy basil, American ginseng, Gotu kola, Lemon balm, Common and Spanish sages and spearmint. Botanicals are discussed in terms of available clinical efficacy data and current safety profiles. Data gaps are highlighted for both efficacy and safety to bring attention to unmet needs and future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8762178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Bentham Science Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87621782022-03-14 The Safety and Efficacy of Botanicals with Nootropic Effects Roe, Amy L. Venkataraman, Arvind Curr Neuropharmacol Article Recent estimates for the global brain health supplement category, i.e. nootropic market size, will grow to nearly $5.8 billion by 2023. Overall, nearly one-quarter (23%) of adults currently take a supplement to maintain or improve brain health or delay and reverse dementia. Not surprisingly, the use of such supplements increases with age - more than one-third of the oldest generation (ages 74 and older) takes a supplement for brain health. This widespread use is being driven by a strong desire both in the younger and older generations to enhance cognitive performance and achieve healthy aging. The most prevalent botanicals currently dominating the nootropic marketplace include Gingko biloba, American ginseng, and Bacopa monnieri. However, other botanicals that affect stress, focus, attention, and sleep have also been procured by dietary supplement companies developing products for improving both, short and long-term brain health. This review focuses on efficacy data for neuroactive botanicals targeted at improving cognitive function, stress reduction, memory, mood, attention, concentration, focus, and alertness, including Bacopa monnieri, Ginkgo biloba, Holy basil, American ginseng, Gotu kola, Lemon balm, Common and Spanish sages and spearmint. Botanicals are discussed in terms of available clinical efficacy data and current safety profiles. Data gaps are highlighted for both efficacy and safety to bring attention to unmet needs and future research. Bentham Science Publishers 2021-09-14 2021-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8762178/ /pubmed/34315377 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570159X19666210726150432 Text en © 2021 Bentham Science Publishers https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Roe, Amy L.
Venkataraman, Arvind
The Safety and Efficacy of Botanicals with Nootropic Effects
title The Safety and Efficacy of Botanicals with Nootropic Effects
title_full The Safety and Efficacy of Botanicals with Nootropic Effects
title_fullStr The Safety and Efficacy of Botanicals with Nootropic Effects
title_full_unstemmed The Safety and Efficacy of Botanicals with Nootropic Effects
title_short The Safety and Efficacy of Botanicals with Nootropic Effects
title_sort safety and efficacy of botanicals with nootropic effects
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8762178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34315377
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570159X19666210726150432
work_keys_str_mv AT roeamyl thesafetyandefficacyofbotanicalswithnootropiceffects
AT venkataramanarvind thesafetyandefficacyofbotanicalswithnootropiceffects
AT roeamyl safetyandefficacyofbotanicalswithnootropiceffects
AT venkataramanarvind safetyandefficacyofbotanicalswithnootropiceffects