Cargando…

Mapping Thematic Trends and Analysing Hotspots Concerning the Use of Stem Cells for Cartilage Regeneration: A Bibliometric Analysis From 2010 to 2020

Background: Defects of articular cartilage represent a common condition that usually progresses to osteoarthritis with pain and dysfunction of the joint. Current treatment strategies have yielded limited success in these patients. Stem cells are emerging as a promising option for cartilage regenerat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xia, Demeng, Wu, Jianghong, Zhou, Feng, Wang, Sheng, Zhang, Zhentao, Zhou, Panyu, Xu, Shuogui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8762272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35046799
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.737939
_version_ 1784633724937175040
author Xia, Demeng
Wu, Jianghong
Zhou, Feng
Wang, Sheng
Zhang, Zhentao
Zhou, Panyu
Xu, Shuogui
author_facet Xia, Demeng
Wu, Jianghong
Zhou, Feng
Wang, Sheng
Zhang, Zhentao
Zhou, Panyu
Xu, Shuogui
author_sort Xia, Demeng
collection PubMed
description Background: Defects of articular cartilage represent a common condition that usually progresses to osteoarthritis with pain and dysfunction of the joint. Current treatment strategies have yielded limited success in these patients. Stem cells are emerging as a promising option for cartilage regeneration. We aim to summarize the developmental history of stem cells for cartilage regeneration and to analyse the relevant trends and hotspots. Methods: We screened all relevant literature on stem cells for cartilage regeneration from Web of Science during 2010–2020 and analysed the research trends in this field by VOSviewer and CiteSpace. We also summarized previous clinical trials. Results: We screened 1,011 publications. China contributed the largest number of publications (317, 31.36%) and citations (81,376, 48.61%). The United States achieved the highest H-index (39). Shanghai Jiao Tong University had the largest number of publications (34) among all full-time institutions. The Journal of Biomaterials and Stem Cell Research and Therapy published the largest number of studies on stem cells for cartilage regeneration (35). SEKIYA I and YANG F published the majority of articles in this field (14), while TOH WS was cited most frequently (740). Regarding clinical research on stem cells for cartilage regeneration, the keyword “double-blind” emerged in recent years, with an average year of 2018.75. In tissue engineering, the keyword “3D printing” appeared latest, with an average year of 2019.625. In biological studies, the key word “extracellular vesicles” appeared latest, with an average year of 2018.9091. The current research trend indicates that basic research is gradually transforming to tissue engineering. Clinical trials have confirmed the safety and feasibility of stem cells for cartilage regeneration. Conclusion: Multiple scientific methods were employed to reveal productivity, collaborations, and research hotspots related to the use of stem cells for cartilage regeneration. 3D printing, extracellular vesicles, and double-blind clinical trials are research hotspots and are likely to be promising in the near future. Further studies are needed for to improve our understanding of this field, and clinical trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed for clinical transformation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8762272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87622722022-01-18 Mapping Thematic Trends and Analysing Hotspots Concerning the Use of Stem Cells for Cartilage Regeneration: A Bibliometric Analysis From 2010 to 2020 Xia, Demeng Wu, Jianghong Zhou, Feng Wang, Sheng Zhang, Zhentao Zhou, Panyu Xu, Shuogui Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Defects of articular cartilage represent a common condition that usually progresses to osteoarthritis with pain and dysfunction of the joint. Current treatment strategies have yielded limited success in these patients. Stem cells are emerging as a promising option for cartilage regeneration. We aim to summarize the developmental history of stem cells for cartilage regeneration and to analyse the relevant trends and hotspots. Methods: We screened all relevant literature on stem cells for cartilage regeneration from Web of Science during 2010–2020 and analysed the research trends in this field by VOSviewer and CiteSpace. We also summarized previous clinical trials. Results: We screened 1,011 publications. China contributed the largest number of publications (317, 31.36%) and citations (81,376, 48.61%). The United States achieved the highest H-index (39). Shanghai Jiao Tong University had the largest number of publications (34) among all full-time institutions. The Journal of Biomaterials and Stem Cell Research and Therapy published the largest number of studies on stem cells for cartilage regeneration (35). SEKIYA I and YANG F published the majority of articles in this field (14), while TOH WS was cited most frequently (740). Regarding clinical research on stem cells for cartilage regeneration, the keyword “double-blind” emerged in recent years, with an average year of 2018.75. In tissue engineering, the keyword “3D printing” appeared latest, with an average year of 2019.625. In biological studies, the key word “extracellular vesicles” appeared latest, with an average year of 2018.9091. The current research trend indicates that basic research is gradually transforming to tissue engineering. Clinical trials have confirmed the safety and feasibility of stem cells for cartilage regeneration. Conclusion: Multiple scientific methods were employed to reveal productivity, collaborations, and research hotspots related to the use of stem cells for cartilage regeneration. 3D printing, extracellular vesicles, and double-blind clinical trials are research hotspots and are likely to be promising in the near future. Further studies are needed for to improve our understanding of this field, and clinical trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed for clinical transformation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8762272/ /pubmed/35046799 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.737939 Text en Copyright © 2021 Xia, Wu, Zhou, Wang, Zhang, Zhou and Xu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Xia, Demeng
Wu, Jianghong
Zhou, Feng
Wang, Sheng
Zhang, Zhentao
Zhou, Panyu
Xu, Shuogui
Mapping Thematic Trends and Analysing Hotspots Concerning the Use of Stem Cells for Cartilage Regeneration: A Bibliometric Analysis From 2010 to 2020
title Mapping Thematic Trends and Analysing Hotspots Concerning the Use of Stem Cells for Cartilage Regeneration: A Bibliometric Analysis From 2010 to 2020
title_full Mapping Thematic Trends and Analysing Hotspots Concerning the Use of Stem Cells for Cartilage Regeneration: A Bibliometric Analysis From 2010 to 2020
title_fullStr Mapping Thematic Trends and Analysing Hotspots Concerning the Use of Stem Cells for Cartilage Regeneration: A Bibliometric Analysis From 2010 to 2020
title_full_unstemmed Mapping Thematic Trends and Analysing Hotspots Concerning the Use of Stem Cells for Cartilage Regeneration: A Bibliometric Analysis From 2010 to 2020
title_short Mapping Thematic Trends and Analysing Hotspots Concerning the Use of Stem Cells for Cartilage Regeneration: A Bibliometric Analysis From 2010 to 2020
title_sort mapping thematic trends and analysing hotspots concerning the use of stem cells for cartilage regeneration: a bibliometric analysis from 2010 to 2020
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8762272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35046799
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.737939
work_keys_str_mv AT xiademeng mappingthematictrendsandanalysinghotspotsconcerningtheuseofstemcellsforcartilageregenerationabibliometricanalysisfrom2010to2020
AT wujianghong mappingthematictrendsandanalysinghotspotsconcerningtheuseofstemcellsforcartilageregenerationabibliometricanalysisfrom2010to2020
AT zhoufeng mappingthematictrendsandanalysinghotspotsconcerningtheuseofstemcellsforcartilageregenerationabibliometricanalysisfrom2010to2020
AT wangsheng mappingthematictrendsandanalysinghotspotsconcerningtheuseofstemcellsforcartilageregenerationabibliometricanalysisfrom2010to2020
AT zhangzhentao mappingthematictrendsandanalysinghotspotsconcerningtheuseofstemcellsforcartilageregenerationabibliometricanalysisfrom2010to2020
AT zhoupanyu mappingthematictrendsandanalysinghotspotsconcerningtheuseofstemcellsforcartilageregenerationabibliometricanalysisfrom2010to2020
AT xushuogui mappingthematictrendsandanalysinghotspotsconcerningtheuseofstemcellsforcartilageregenerationabibliometricanalysisfrom2010to2020