Cargando…
Prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy for gynaecologic malignancies
Wound complications are an important cause of postoperative morbidity among patients with gynaecologic malignancies. We evaluated whether the placement of closed‐incisional negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) at the time of laparotomy for gynaecologic cancer surgery reduced wound complication rates. A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8762569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34268886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13628 |
_version_ | 1784633791150555136 |
---|---|
author | Martí, Maria Teresa Climent Fernandez‐Gonzalez, Sergi Martí, Maria Dolores Pla, Maria Jesus Barahona, Marc Ponce, Jordi |
author_facet | Martí, Maria Teresa Climent Fernandez‐Gonzalez, Sergi Martí, Maria Dolores Pla, Maria Jesus Barahona, Marc Ponce, Jordi |
author_sort | Martí, Maria Teresa Climent |
collection | PubMed |
description | Wound complications are an important cause of postoperative morbidity among patients with gynaecologic malignancies. We evaluated whether the placement of closed‐incisional negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) at the time of laparotomy for gynaecologic cancer surgery reduced wound complication rates. A retrospective cohort study with primary wound closure performed by a gynaecologic oncologist was carried out. We evaluated two cohorts of patients who underwent surgery in 2017 with standard closure and patients who underwent surgery in 2019 with the placement of prophylactic ciNPT. Postoperative outcomes were examined. A total of 143 patients were included, 85 (59.4%) vs 58 (40.6%) with standard closure and ciNPT, respectively. The total complication rate in our sample was 38.71%. The rate of surgical complications in patients treated with ciNPT was 6.9% compared with 31.8% (P = .000) in patients treated with standard closure. In the analysis of complications, a significant reduction in infections (17.1%), seromas (15.4%), and wound dehiscence (17.1%) were observed when ciNPT was applied. The median hospital stay was 8 vs 6 days in the standard closure vs ciNPT groups (P = .048). The use of the prophylactic ciNPT following a laparotomy may decrease wound complications and hospital stays in oncological patients. ciNPT could be considered as part of clinical practice in patients at high risk of wound complications, such as patients with gynaecological malignancies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8762569 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87625692022-01-21 Prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy for gynaecologic malignancies Martí, Maria Teresa Climent Fernandez‐Gonzalez, Sergi Martí, Maria Dolores Pla, Maria Jesus Barahona, Marc Ponce, Jordi Int Wound J Original Articles Wound complications are an important cause of postoperative morbidity among patients with gynaecologic malignancies. We evaluated whether the placement of closed‐incisional negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) at the time of laparotomy for gynaecologic cancer surgery reduced wound complication rates. A retrospective cohort study with primary wound closure performed by a gynaecologic oncologist was carried out. We evaluated two cohorts of patients who underwent surgery in 2017 with standard closure and patients who underwent surgery in 2019 with the placement of prophylactic ciNPT. Postoperative outcomes were examined. A total of 143 patients were included, 85 (59.4%) vs 58 (40.6%) with standard closure and ciNPT, respectively. The total complication rate in our sample was 38.71%. The rate of surgical complications in patients treated with ciNPT was 6.9% compared with 31.8% (P = .000) in patients treated with standard closure. In the analysis of complications, a significant reduction in infections (17.1%), seromas (15.4%), and wound dehiscence (17.1%) were observed when ciNPT was applied. The median hospital stay was 8 vs 6 days in the standard closure vs ciNPT groups (P = .048). The use of the prophylactic ciNPT following a laparotomy may decrease wound complications and hospital stays in oncological patients. ciNPT could be considered as part of clinical practice in patients at high risk of wound complications, such as patients with gynaecological malignancies. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8762569/ /pubmed/34268886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13628 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Martí, Maria Teresa Climent Fernandez‐Gonzalez, Sergi Martí, Maria Dolores Pla, Maria Jesus Barahona, Marc Ponce, Jordi Prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy for gynaecologic malignancies |
title | Prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy for gynaecologic malignancies |
title_full | Prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy for gynaecologic malignancies |
title_fullStr | Prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy for gynaecologic malignancies |
title_full_unstemmed | Prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy for gynaecologic malignancies |
title_short | Prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy for gynaecologic malignancies |
title_sort | prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy for gynaecologic malignancies |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8762569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34268886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13628 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martimariateresacliment prophylacticincisionalnegativepressurewoundtherapyforgynaecologicmalignancies AT fernandezgonzalezsergi prophylacticincisionalnegativepressurewoundtherapyforgynaecologicmalignancies AT martimariadolores prophylacticincisionalnegativepressurewoundtherapyforgynaecologicmalignancies AT plamariajesus prophylacticincisionalnegativepressurewoundtherapyforgynaecologicmalignancies AT barahonamarc prophylacticincisionalnegativepressurewoundtherapyforgynaecologicmalignancies AT poncejordi prophylacticincisionalnegativepressurewoundtherapyforgynaecologicmalignancies |