Cargando…
Analysis of Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms
PURPOSE: Clinical trials for remyelination in multiple sclerosis (MS) require an imaging biomarker. The multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) is an accurate technique for measuring axonal conduction; however, it produces large datasets requiring lengthy analysis by human experts to detect measu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8762715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35006263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.1.10 |
_version_ | 1784633822937088000 |
---|---|
author | Klistorner, Samuel Eghtedari, Maryam Graham, Stuart L. Klistorner, Alexander |
author_facet | Klistorner, Samuel Eghtedari, Maryam Graham, Stuart L. Klistorner, Alexander |
author_sort | Klistorner, Samuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Clinical trials for remyelination in multiple sclerosis (MS) require an imaging biomarker. The multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) is an accurate technique for measuring axonal conduction; however, it produces large datasets requiring lengthy analysis by human experts to detect measurable responses versus noisy traces. This study aimed to develop a machine-learning approach for the identification of true responses versus noisy traces and the detection of latency peaks in measurable signals. METHODS: We obtained 2240 mfVEP traces from 10 MS patients using the VS-1 mfVEP machine, and they were classified by a skilled expert twice with an interval of 1 week. Of these, 2025 (90%) were classified consistently and used for the study. ResNet-50 and VGG16 models were trained and tested to produce three outputs: no signal, up-sloped signal, or down-sloped signal. Each model ran 1000 iterations with a stochastic gradient descent optimizer with a learning rate of 0.0001. RESULTS: ResNet-50 and VGG16 had false-positive rates of 1.7% and 0.6%, respectively, when the testing dataset was analyzed (n = 612). The false-negative rates were 8.2% and 6.5%, respectively, against the same dataset. The latency measurements in the validation and testing cohorts in the study were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Our models efficiently analyze mfVEPs with <2% false positives compared with human false positives of <8%. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: mfVEP, a safe neurophysiological technique, analyzed using artificial intelligence, can serve as an efficient biomarker in MS clinical trials and signal latency measurement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8762715 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87627152022-01-26 Analysis of Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms Klistorner, Samuel Eghtedari, Maryam Graham, Stuart L. Klistorner, Alexander Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: Clinical trials for remyelination in multiple sclerosis (MS) require an imaging biomarker. The multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) is an accurate technique for measuring axonal conduction; however, it produces large datasets requiring lengthy analysis by human experts to detect measurable responses versus noisy traces. This study aimed to develop a machine-learning approach for the identification of true responses versus noisy traces and the detection of latency peaks in measurable signals. METHODS: We obtained 2240 mfVEP traces from 10 MS patients using the VS-1 mfVEP machine, and they were classified by a skilled expert twice with an interval of 1 week. Of these, 2025 (90%) were classified consistently and used for the study. ResNet-50 and VGG16 models were trained and tested to produce three outputs: no signal, up-sloped signal, or down-sloped signal. Each model ran 1000 iterations with a stochastic gradient descent optimizer with a learning rate of 0.0001. RESULTS: ResNet-50 and VGG16 had false-positive rates of 1.7% and 0.6%, respectively, when the testing dataset was analyzed (n = 612). The false-negative rates were 8.2% and 6.5%, respectively, against the same dataset. The latency measurements in the validation and testing cohorts in the study were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Our models efficiently analyze mfVEPs with <2% false positives compared with human false positives of <8%. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: mfVEP, a safe neurophysiological technique, analyzed using artificial intelligence, can serve as an efficient biomarker in MS clinical trials and signal latency measurement. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8762715/ /pubmed/35006263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.1.10 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Article Klistorner, Samuel Eghtedari, Maryam Graham, Stuart L. Klistorner, Alexander Analysis of Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms |
title | Analysis of Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms |
title_full | Analysis of Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms |
title_fullStr | Analysis of Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms |
title_short | Analysis of Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms |
title_sort | analysis of multifocal visual evoked potentials using artificial intelligence algorithms |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8762715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35006263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.1.10 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klistornersamuel analysisofmultifocalvisualevokedpotentialsusingartificialintelligencealgorithms AT eghtedarimaryam analysisofmultifocalvisualevokedpotentialsusingartificialintelligencealgorithms AT grahamstuartl analysisofmultifocalvisualevokedpotentialsusingartificialintelligencealgorithms AT klistorneralexander analysisofmultifocalvisualevokedpotentialsusingartificialintelligencealgorithms |