Cargando…

Analysis of Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms

PURPOSE: Clinical trials for remyelination in multiple sclerosis (MS) require an imaging biomarker. The multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) is an accurate technique for measuring axonal conduction; however, it produces large datasets requiring lengthy analysis by human experts to detect measu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klistorner, Samuel, Eghtedari, Maryam, Graham, Stuart L., Klistorner, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8762715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35006263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.1.10
_version_ 1784633822937088000
author Klistorner, Samuel
Eghtedari, Maryam
Graham, Stuart L.
Klistorner, Alexander
author_facet Klistorner, Samuel
Eghtedari, Maryam
Graham, Stuart L.
Klistorner, Alexander
author_sort Klistorner, Samuel
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Clinical trials for remyelination in multiple sclerosis (MS) require an imaging biomarker. The multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) is an accurate technique for measuring axonal conduction; however, it produces large datasets requiring lengthy analysis by human experts to detect measurable responses versus noisy traces. This study aimed to develop a machine-learning approach for the identification of true responses versus noisy traces and the detection of latency peaks in measurable signals. METHODS: We obtained 2240 mfVEP traces from 10 MS patients using the VS-1 mfVEP machine, and they were classified by a skilled expert twice with an interval of 1 week. Of these, 2025 (90%) were classified consistently and used for the study. ResNet-50 and VGG16 models were trained and tested to produce three outputs: no signal, up-sloped signal, or down-sloped signal. Each model ran 1000 iterations with a stochastic gradient descent optimizer with a learning rate of 0.0001. RESULTS: ResNet-50 and VGG16 had false-positive rates of 1.7% and 0.6%, respectively, when the testing dataset was analyzed (n = 612). The false-negative rates were 8.2% and 6.5%, respectively, against the same dataset. The latency measurements in the validation and testing cohorts in the study were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Our models efficiently analyze mfVEPs with <2% false positives compared with human false positives of <8%. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: mfVEP, a safe neurophysiological technique, analyzed using artificial intelligence, can serve as an efficient biomarker in MS clinical trials and signal latency measurement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8762715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87627152022-01-26 Analysis of Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms Klistorner, Samuel Eghtedari, Maryam Graham, Stuart L. Klistorner, Alexander Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: Clinical trials for remyelination in multiple sclerosis (MS) require an imaging biomarker. The multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) is an accurate technique for measuring axonal conduction; however, it produces large datasets requiring lengthy analysis by human experts to detect measurable responses versus noisy traces. This study aimed to develop a machine-learning approach for the identification of true responses versus noisy traces and the detection of latency peaks in measurable signals. METHODS: We obtained 2240 mfVEP traces from 10 MS patients using the VS-1 mfVEP machine, and they were classified by a skilled expert twice with an interval of 1 week. Of these, 2025 (90%) were classified consistently and used for the study. ResNet-50 and VGG16 models were trained and tested to produce three outputs: no signal, up-sloped signal, or down-sloped signal. Each model ran 1000 iterations with a stochastic gradient descent optimizer with a learning rate of 0.0001. RESULTS: ResNet-50 and VGG16 had false-positive rates of 1.7% and 0.6%, respectively, when the testing dataset was analyzed (n = 612). The false-negative rates were 8.2% and 6.5%, respectively, against the same dataset. The latency measurements in the validation and testing cohorts in the study were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Our models efficiently analyze mfVEPs with <2% false positives compared with human false positives of <8%. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: mfVEP, a safe neurophysiological technique, analyzed using artificial intelligence, can serve as an efficient biomarker in MS clinical trials and signal latency measurement. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8762715/ /pubmed/35006263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.1.10 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Klistorner, Samuel
Eghtedari, Maryam
Graham, Stuart L.
Klistorner, Alexander
Analysis of Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms
title Analysis of Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms
title_full Analysis of Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms
title_fullStr Analysis of Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms
title_short Analysis of Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms
title_sort analysis of multifocal visual evoked potentials using artificial intelligence algorithms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8762715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35006263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.1.10
work_keys_str_mv AT klistornersamuel analysisofmultifocalvisualevokedpotentialsusingartificialintelligencealgorithms
AT eghtedarimaryam analysisofmultifocalvisualevokedpotentialsusingartificialintelligencealgorithms
AT grahamstuartl analysisofmultifocalvisualevokedpotentialsusingartificialintelligencealgorithms
AT klistorneralexander analysisofmultifocalvisualevokedpotentialsusingartificialintelligencealgorithms