Cargando…

Management of Malpositioned Cervical Interfacet Spacers: An Institutional Case Series

Introduction Posterior cervical foraminotomy and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) are the mainstay treatments for cervical radiculopathy. A recent alternative or adjunct involves the placement of interfacet spacers, which promote indirect decompression by increasing foraminal height. C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garcia, Joseph H, Haddad, Alexander F, Patel, Arati, Safaee, Michael M, Pennicooke, Brenton, Mummaneni, Praveen V, Clark, Aaron J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8763025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35070522
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20450
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction Posterior cervical foraminotomy and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) are the mainstay treatments for cervical radiculopathy. A recent alternative or adjunct involves the placement of interfacet spacers, which promote indirect decompression by increasing foraminal height. Cervical interfacet spacers have been shown to be safe options for indirect decompression and improve short-term clinical outcomes in patients with cervical spine pathologies. However, no previous data regarding malpositioned spacers and their management have been reported. Given this paucity of data, we aim to present examples of malpositioned interfacet spacers and their management. Methods This was a retrospective single-center review. Results Twenty-five patients were identified in which interfacet spacers were used at a single level in 19 cases, two levels in five cases, and three levels in one case. The cohort had a mean follow-up of 14.4 months. Among 60 total spacers placed, two required repositioning (3.3%). The first underwent bilateral placement at C4/5 and developed a unilateral deltoid palsy postoperatively. She was taken back to the operating room the same day for implant removal. A second patient underwent removal after a malpositioned implant at C4/5 was identified on an intraoperative CT scan. A third patient had spacers placed at a referring hospital and presented with progressive neck pain and radiculopathy. She underwent successful removal with a resolution of her symptoms. Conclusions Interfacet spacers represent a novel technique for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy, however, there are limited data on their utilization. We present the first reports of malpositioned spacers and their management. Patients with small facet joints and lateral masses may be at increased risk for malposition, and intraoperative fluoroscopy may not adequately confirm implant placement. Surgeons should use caution when implementing new technology with a low threshold for intraoperative CT to confirm the appropriate placement of these devices.