Cargando…
Deep Learning in Prediction of Late Major Bleeding After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
PURPOSE: Late major bleeding is one of the main complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We aimed to develop a risk prediction model based on deep learning to predict major or life-threatening bleeding complications (MLBCs) after TAVR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8763202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35046728 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S333147 |
_version_ | 1784633888503496704 |
---|---|
author | Jia, Yuheng Luosang, Gaden Li, Yiming Wang, Jianyong Li, Pengyu Xiong, Tianyuan Li, Yijian Liao, Yanbiao Zhao, Zhengang Peng, Yong Feng, Yuan Jiang, Weili Li, Wenjian Zhang, Xinpei Yi, Zhang Chen, Mao |
author_facet | Jia, Yuheng Luosang, Gaden Li, Yiming Wang, Jianyong Li, Pengyu Xiong, Tianyuan Li, Yijian Liao, Yanbiao Zhao, Zhengang Peng, Yong Feng, Yuan Jiang, Weili Li, Wenjian Zhang, Xinpei Yi, Zhang Chen, Mao |
author_sort | Jia, Yuheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Late major bleeding is one of the main complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We aimed to develop a risk prediction model based on deep learning to predict major or life-threatening bleeding complications (MLBCs) after TAVR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study including TAVR patients from West China Hospital of Sichuan University Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Registry (ChiCTR2000033419) between April 17, 2012 and May 27, 2020. A deep learning-based model named BLeNet was developed with 56 features covering baseline, procedural, and post-procedural characteristics. The model was validated with the bootstrap method and evaluated using Harrell’s concordance index (c-index), receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and Kaplan–Meier estimate. Captum interpretation library was applied to identify feature importance. The BLeNet model was compared with the traditional Cox proportional hazard (Cox-PH) model and the random survival forest model in the metrics mentioned above. RESULTS: The BLeNet model outperformed the Cox-PH and random survival forest models significantly in discrimination [optimism-corrected c-index of BLeNet vs Cox-PH vs random survival forest: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.79–0.92) vs 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63–0.77) vs 0.70 (95% CI: 0.61–0.74)] and calibration (integrated calibration index of BLeNet vs Cox-PH vs random survival forest: 0.007 vs 0.015 vs 0.019). In Kaplan–Meier analysis, BLeNet model had great performance in stratifying high- and low-bleeding risk patients (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Deep learning is a feasible way to build prediction models concerning TAVR prognosis. A dedicated bleeding risk prediction model was developed for TAVR patients to facilitate well-informed clinical decisions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8763202 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87632022022-01-18 Deep Learning in Prediction of Late Major Bleeding After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Jia, Yuheng Luosang, Gaden Li, Yiming Wang, Jianyong Li, Pengyu Xiong, Tianyuan Li, Yijian Liao, Yanbiao Zhao, Zhengang Peng, Yong Feng, Yuan Jiang, Weili Li, Wenjian Zhang, Xinpei Yi, Zhang Chen, Mao Clin Epidemiol Original Research PURPOSE: Late major bleeding is one of the main complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We aimed to develop a risk prediction model based on deep learning to predict major or life-threatening bleeding complications (MLBCs) after TAVR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study including TAVR patients from West China Hospital of Sichuan University Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Registry (ChiCTR2000033419) between April 17, 2012 and May 27, 2020. A deep learning-based model named BLeNet was developed with 56 features covering baseline, procedural, and post-procedural characteristics. The model was validated with the bootstrap method and evaluated using Harrell’s concordance index (c-index), receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and Kaplan–Meier estimate. Captum interpretation library was applied to identify feature importance. The BLeNet model was compared with the traditional Cox proportional hazard (Cox-PH) model and the random survival forest model in the metrics mentioned above. RESULTS: The BLeNet model outperformed the Cox-PH and random survival forest models significantly in discrimination [optimism-corrected c-index of BLeNet vs Cox-PH vs random survival forest: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.79–0.92) vs 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63–0.77) vs 0.70 (95% CI: 0.61–0.74)] and calibration (integrated calibration index of BLeNet vs Cox-PH vs random survival forest: 0.007 vs 0.015 vs 0.019). In Kaplan–Meier analysis, BLeNet model had great performance in stratifying high- and low-bleeding risk patients (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Deep learning is a feasible way to build prediction models concerning TAVR prognosis. A dedicated bleeding risk prediction model was developed for TAVR patients to facilitate well-informed clinical decisions. Dove 2022-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8763202/ /pubmed/35046728 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S333147 Text en © 2022 Jia et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Jia, Yuheng Luosang, Gaden Li, Yiming Wang, Jianyong Li, Pengyu Xiong, Tianyuan Li, Yijian Liao, Yanbiao Zhao, Zhengang Peng, Yong Feng, Yuan Jiang, Weili Li, Wenjian Zhang, Xinpei Yi, Zhang Chen, Mao Deep Learning in Prediction of Late Major Bleeding After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement |
title | Deep Learning in Prediction of Late Major Bleeding After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement |
title_full | Deep Learning in Prediction of Late Major Bleeding After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement |
title_fullStr | Deep Learning in Prediction of Late Major Bleeding After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep Learning in Prediction of Late Major Bleeding After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement |
title_short | Deep Learning in Prediction of Late Major Bleeding After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement |
title_sort | deep learning in prediction of late major bleeding after transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8763202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35046728 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S333147 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiayuheng deeplearninginpredictionoflatemajorbleedingaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT luosanggaden deeplearninginpredictionoflatemajorbleedingaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT liyiming deeplearninginpredictionoflatemajorbleedingaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT wangjianyong deeplearninginpredictionoflatemajorbleedingaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT lipengyu deeplearninginpredictionoflatemajorbleedingaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT xiongtianyuan deeplearninginpredictionoflatemajorbleedingaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT liyijian deeplearninginpredictionoflatemajorbleedingaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT liaoyanbiao deeplearninginpredictionoflatemajorbleedingaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT zhaozhengang deeplearninginpredictionoflatemajorbleedingaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT pengyong deeplearninginpredictionoflatemajorbleedingaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT fengyuan deeplearninginpredictionoflatemajorbleedingaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT jiangweili deeplearninginpredictionoflatemajorbleedingaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT liwenjian deeplearninginpredictionoflatemajorbleedingaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT zhangxinpei deeplearninginpredictionoflatemajorbleedingaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT yizhang deeplearninginpredictionoflatemajorbleedingaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT chenmao deeplearninginpredictionoflatemajorbleedingaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement |