Cargando…

Temozolomide Nonresponsiveness in Aggressive Prolactinomas and Carcinomas: Management and Outcomes

CONTEXT: Temozolomide (TMZ) is endorsed as the treatment of choice in aggressive or malignant pituitary adenomas. OBJECTIVE: Herein we describe a case of an aggressive prolactinoma that was resistant to TMZ. We performed a literature review of similar nonresponsive, aggressive prolactinomas. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Das, Liza, Rai, Ashutosh, Salunke, Pravin, Ahuja, Chirag Kamal, Sood, Ashwani, Radotra, Bishan Dass, Sood, Ridhi, Korbonits, Márta, Dutta, Pinaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8763612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35059545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvab190
Descripción
Sumario:CONTEXT: Temozolomide (TMZ) is endorsed as the treatment of choice in aggressive or malignant pituitary adenomas. OBJECTIVE: Herein we describe a case of an aggressive prolactinoma that was resistant to TMZ. We performed a literature review of similar nonresponsive, aggressive prolactinomas. METHODS: A 40-year-old woman presented with a giant prolactinoma that required cabergoline, transsphenoidal surgery, and radiotherapy to achieve near-normal prolactin and apparently no residual tumor. A year later, she presented with multiple cranial nerve involvement due to a recurrent tumor extending to the infratemporal fossa. She underwent transfrontal surgery, second radiotherapy, and was started on TMZ. Despite 8 cycles of temozolomide (200 mg/m(2), 5/28-day cycle), she had progressive disease and ultimately succumbed to the disease. PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and prior review articles were searched for manuscripts about patients with aggressive prolactinomas who had been treated with TMZ. Data on demography, duration of therapy, and management outcomes were analyzed in those with progressive disease. RESULTS: We identified 94 cases of patients with aggressive/malignant prolactinomas in the literature who had received TMZ. Progressive disease despite TMZ was present in 36 cases (38%). There was a male preponderance (65%) among these and 40% had aggressive prolactinomas, whereas the rest had carcinomas. Patients received a median of 8 cycles (interquartile range, 3.5-11.5) of TMZ. O6‐methylguanine‐DNA‐methyltransferase (MGMT) immunostaining was negative in 35%. Overall mortality at the time of publication was 40%, at a duration varying from 2 to 20 years from diagnosis. CONCLUSION: TMZ resistance in aggressive/malignant prolactinomas is challenging. Progressive disease on optimal TMZ treatment entails the use of newer agents.