Cargando…
Evaluating anthracycline + taxane versus taxane-based chemotherapy in older women with node-negative triple-negative breast cancer: a SEER-Medicare study
PURPOSE: Adjuvant chemotherapy reduces recurrence in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, data are lacking evaluating anthracycline + taxane (ATAX) versus taxane-based (TAX) chemotherapy in older women with node-negative TNBC, as they are often excluded from trials. The purpose...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8763743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34705147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06424-z |
_version_ | 1784634016778944512 |
---|---|
author | Schreiber, Anna R. Kagihara, Jodi Eguchi, Megan Kabos, Peter Fisher, Christine M. Meyer, Elisabeth Molina, Elizabeth Kondapalli, Lavanya Bradley, Cathy J. Diamond, Jennifer R. |
author_facet | Schreiber, Anna R. Kagihara, Jodi Eguchi, Megan Kabos, Peter Fisher, Christine M. Meyer, Elisabeth Molina, Elizabeth Kondapalli, Lavanya Bradley, Cathy J. Diamond, Jennifer R. |
author_sort | Schreiber, Anna R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Adjuvant chemotherapy reduces recurrence in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, data are lacking evaluating anthracycline + taxane (ATAX) versus taxane-based (TAX) chemotherapy in older women with node-negative TNBC, as they are often excluded from trials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of adjuvant ATAX versus TAX on cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in older patients with node-negative TNBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the SEER-Medicare database, we selected patients aged ≥ 66 years diagnosed with Stage T1-4N0M0 TNBC between 2010 and 2015 (N = 3348). Kaplan–Meier survival curves and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate 3-year OS and CSS. Multivariant Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent factors associated with use of ATAX compared to TAX. RESULTS: Approximately half (N = 1679) of patients identified received chemotherapy and of these, 58.6% (N = 984) received TAX, 25.0% (N = 420) received ATAX, and 16.4% (N = 275) received another regimen. Three-year CSS and OS was improved with any adjuvant chemotherapy from 88.9 to 92.2% (p = 0.0018) for CSS and 77.2% to 88.6% for OS (p < 0.0001). In contrast, treatment with ATAX compared to TAX was associated with inferior 3-year CSS and OS. Three-year CSS was 93.7% with TAX compared to 89.8% (p = 0.048) for ATAX and OS was 91.0% for TAX and 86.4% for ATAX (p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: While adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved clinical outcomes, the administration of ATAX compared to TAX was associated with inferior 3-year OS and CSS in older women with node-negative TNBC. The use of adjuvant ATAX should be considered carefully in this patient population. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-021-06424-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8763743 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87637432022-01-31 Evaluating anthracycline + taxane versus taxane-based chemotherapy in older women with node-negative triple-negative breast cancer: a SEER-Medicare study Schreiber, Anna R. Kagihara, Jodi Eguchi, Megan Kabos, Peter Fisher, Christine M. Meyer, Elisabeth Molina, Elizabeth Kondapalli, Lavanya Bradley, Cathy J. Diamond, Jennifer R. Breast Cancer Res Treat Epidemiology PURPOSE: Adjuvant chemotherapy reduces recurrence in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, data are lacking evaluating anthracycline + taxane (ATAX) versus taxane-based (TAX) chemotherapy in older women with node-negative TNBC, as they are often excluded from trials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of adjuvant ATAX versus TAX on cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in older patients with node-negative TNBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the SEER-Medicare database, we selected patients aged ≥ 66 years diagnosed with Stage T1-4N0M0 TNBC between 2010 and 2015 (N = 3348). Kaplan–Meier survival curves and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate 3-year OS and CSS. Multivariant Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent factors associated with use of ATAX compared to TAX. RESULTS: Approximately half (N = 1679) of patients identified received chemotherapy and of these, 58.6% (N = 984) received TAX, 25.0% (N = 420) received ATAX, and 16.4% (N = 275) received another regimen. Three-year CSS and OS was improved with any adjuvant chemotherapy from 88.9 to 92.2% (p = 0.0018) for CSS and 77.2% to 88.6% for OS (p < 0.0001). In contrast, treatment with ATAX compared to TAX was associated with inferior 3-year CSS and OS. Three-year CSS was 93.7% with TAX compared to 89.8% (p = 0.048) for ATAX and OS was 91.0% for TAX and 86.4% for ATAX (p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: While adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved clinical outcomes, the administration of ATAX compared to TAX was associated with inferior 3-year OS and CSS in older women with node-negative TNBC. The use of adjuvant ATAX should be considered carefully in this patient population. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-021-06424-z. Springer US 2021-10-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8763743/ /pubmed/34705147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06424-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Schreiber, Anna R. Kagihara, Jodi Eguchi, Megan Kabos, Peter Fisher, Christine M. Meyer, Elisabeth Molina, Elizabeth Kondapalli, Lavanya Bradley, Cathy J. Diamond, Jennifer R. Evaluating anthracycline + taxane versus taxane-based chemotherapy in older women with node-negative triple-negative breast cancer: a SEER-Medicare study |
title | Evaluating anthracycline + taxane versus taxane-based chemotherapy in older women with node-negative triple-negative breast cancer: a SEER-Medicare study |
title_full | Evaluating anthracycline + taxane versus taxane-based chemotherapy in older women with node-negative triple-negative breast cancer: a SEER-Medicare study |
title_fullStr | Evaluating anthracycline + taxane versus taxane-based chemotherapy in older women with node-negative triple-negative breast cancer: a SEER-Medicare study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating anthracycline + taxane versus taxane-based chemotherapy in older women with node-negative triple-negative breast cancer: a SEER-Medicare study |
title_short | Evaluating anthracycline + taxane versus taxane-based chemotherapy in older women with node-negative triple-negative breast cancer: a SEER-Medicare study |
title_sort | evaluating anthracycline + taxane versus taxane-based chemotherapy in older women with node-negative triple-negative breast cancer: a seer-medicare study |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8763743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34705147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06424-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schreiberannar evaluatinganthracyclinetaxaneversustaxanebasedchemotherapyinolderwomenwithnodenegativetriplenegativebreastcanceraseermedicarestudy AT kagiharajodi evaluatinganthracyclinetaxaneversustaxanebasedchemotherapyinolderwomenwithnodenegativetriplenegativebreastcanceraseermedicarestudy AT eguchimegan evaluatinganthracyclinetaxaneversustaxanebasedchemotherapyinolderwomenwithnodenegativetriplenegativebreastcanceraseermedicarestudy AT kabospeter evaluatinganthracyclinetaxaneversustaxanebasedchemotherapyinolderwomenwithnodenegativetriplenegativebreastcanceraseermedicarestudy AT fisherchristinem evaluatinganthracyclinetaxaneversustaxanebasedchemotherapyinolderwomenwithnodenegativetriplenegativebreastcanceraseermedicarestudy AT meyerelisabeth evaluatinganthracyclinetaxaneversustaxanebasedchemotherapyinolderwomenwithnodenegativetriplenegativebreastcanceraseermedicarestudy AT molinaelizabeth evaluatinganthracyclinetaxaneversustaxanebasedchemotherapyinolderwomenwithnodenegativetriplenegativebreastcanceraseermedicarestudy AT kondapallilavanya evaluatinganthracyclinetaxaneversustaxanebasedchemotherapyinolderwomenwithnodenegativetriplenegativebreastcanceraseermedicarestudy AT bradleycathyj evaluatinganthracyclinetaxaneversustaxanebasedchemotherapyinolderwomenwithnodenegativetriplenegativebreastcanceraseermedicarestudy AT diamondjenniferr evaluatinganthracyclinetaxaneversustaxanebasedchemotherapyinolderwomenwithnodenegativetriplenegativebreastcanceraseermedicarestudy |