Cargando…

Evaluating anthracycline + taxane versus taxane-based chemotherapy in older women with node-negative triple-negative breast cancer: a SEER-Medicare study

PURPOSE: Adjuvant chemotherapy reduces recurrence in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, data are lacking evaluating anthracycline + taxane (ATAX) versus taxane-based (TAX) chemotherapy in older women with node-negative TNBC, as they are often excluded from trials. The purpose...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schreiber, Anna R., Kagihara, Jodi, Eguchi, Megan, Kabos, Peter, Fisher, Christine M., Meyer, Elisabeth, Molina, Elizabeth, Kondapalli, Lavanya, Bradley, Cathy J., Diamond, Jennifer R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8763743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34705147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06424-z
_version_ 1784634016778944512
author Schreiber, Anna R.
Kagihara, Jodi
Eguchi, Megan
Kabos, Peter
Fisher, Christine M.
Meyer, Elisabeth
Molina, Elizabeth
Kondapalli, Lavanya
Bradley, Cathy J.
Diamond, Jennifer R.
author_facet Schreiber, Anna R.
Kagihara, Jodi
Eguchi, Megan
Kabos, Peter
Fisher, Christine M.
Meyer, Elisabeth
Molina, Elizabeth
Kondapalli, Lavanya
Bradley, Cathy J.
Diamond, Jennifer R.
author_sort Schreiber, Anna R.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Adjuvant chemotherapy reduces recurrence in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, data are lacking evaluating anthracycline + taxane (ATAX) versus taxane-based (TAX) chemotherapy in older women with node-negative TNBC, as they are often excluded from trials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of adjuvant ATAX versus TAX on cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in older patients with node-negative TNBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the SEER-Medicare database, we selected patients aged ≥ 66 years diagnosed with Stage T1-4N0M0 TNBC between 2010 and 2015 (N = 3348). Kaplan–Meier survival curves and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate 3-year OS and CSS. Multivariant Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent factors associated with use of ATAX compared to TAX. RESULTS: Approximately half (N = 1679) of patients identified received chemotherapy and of these, 58.6% (N = 984) received TAX, 25.0% (N = 420) received ATAX, and 16.4% (N = 275) received another regimen. Three-year CSS and OS was improved with any adjuvant chemotherapy from 88.9 to 92.2% (p = 0.0018) for CSS and 77.2% to 88.6% for OS (p < 0.0001). In contrast, treatment with ATAX compared to TAX was associated with inferior 3-year CSS and OS. Three-year CSS was 93.7% with TAX compared to 89.8% (p = 0.048) for ATAX and OS was 91.0% for TAX and 86.4% for ATAX (p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: While adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved clinical outcomes, the administration of ATAX compared to TAX was associated with inferior 3-year OS and CSS in older women with node-negative TNBC. The use of adjuvant ATAX should be considered carefully in this patient population. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-021-06424-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8763743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87637432022-01-31 Evaluating anthracycline + taxane versus taxane-based chemotherapy in older women with node-negative triple-negative breast cancer: a SEER-Medicare study Schreiber, Anna R. Kagihara, Jodi Eguchi, Megan Kabos, Peter Fisher, Christine M. Meyer, Elisabeth Molina, Elizabeth Kondapalli, Lavanya Bradley, Cathy J. Diamond, Jennifer R. Breast Cancer Res Treat Epidemiology PURPOSE: Adjuvant chemotherapy reduces recurrence in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, data are lacking evaluating anthracycline + taxane (ATAX) versus taxane-based (TAX) chemotherapy in older women with node-negative TNBC, as they are often excluded from trials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of adjuvant ATAX versus TAX on cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in older patients with node-negative TNBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the SEER-Medicare database, we selected patients aged ≥ 66 years diagnosed with Stage T1-4N0M0 TNBC between 2010 and 2015 (N = 3348). Kaplan–Meier survival curves and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate 3-year OS and CSS. Multivariant Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent factors associated with use of ATAX compared to TAX. RESULTS: Approximately half (N = 1679) of patients identified received chemotherapy and of these, 58.6% (N = 984) received TAX, 25.0% (N = 420) received ATAX, and 16.4% (N = 275) received another regimen. Three-year CSS and OS was improved with any adjuvant chemotherapy from 88.9 to 92.2% (p = 0.0018) for CSS and 77.2% to 88.6% for OS (p < 0.0001). In contrast, treatment with ATAX compared to TAX was associated with inferior 3-year CSS and OS. Three-year CSS was 93.7% with TAX compared to 89.8% (p = 0.048) for ATAX and OS was 91.0% for TAX and 86.4% for ATAX (p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: While adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved clinical outcomes, the administration of ATAX compared to TAX was associated with inferior 3-year OS and CSS in older women with node-negative TNBC. The use of adjuvant ATAX should be considered carefully in this patient population. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-021-06424-z. Springer US 2021-10-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8763743/ /pubmed/34705147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06424-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Schreiber, Anna R.
Kagihara, Jodi
Eguchi, Megan
Kabos, Peter
Fisher, Christine M.
Meyer, Elisabeth
Molina, Elizabeth
Kondapalli, Lavanya
Bradley, Cathy J.
Diamond, Jennifer R.
Evaluating anthracycline + taxane versus taxane-based chemotherapy in older women with node-negative triple-negative breast cancer: a SEER-Medicare study
title Evaluating anthracycline + taxane versus taxane-based chemotherapy in older women with node-negative triple-negative breast cancer: a SEER-Medicare study
title_full Evaluating anthracycline + taxane versus taxane-based chemotherapy in older women with node-negative triple-negative breast cancer: a SEER-Medicare study
title_fullStr Evaluating anthracycline + taxane versus taxane-based chemotherapy in older women with node-negative triple-negative breast cancer: a SEER-Medicare study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating anthracycline + taxane versus taxane-based chemotherapy in older women with node-negative triple-negative breast cancer: a SEER-Medicare study
title_short Evaluating anthracycline + taxane versus taxane-based chemotherapy in older women with node-negative triple-negative breast cancer: a SEER-Medicare study
title_sort evaluating anthracycline + taxane versus taxane-based chemotherapy in older women with node-negative triple-negative breast cancer: a seer-medicare study
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8763743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34705147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06424-z
work_keys_str_mv AT schreiberannar evaluatinganthracyclinetaxaneversustaxanebasedchemotherapyinolderwomenwithnodenegativetriplenegativebreastcanceraseermedicarestudy
AT kagiharajodi evaluatinganthracyclinetaxaneversustaxanebasedchemotherapyinolderwomenwithnodenegativetriplenegativebreastcanceraseermedicarestudy
AT eguchimegan evaluatinganthracyclinetaxaneversustaxanebasedchemotherapyinolderwomenwithnodenegativetriplenegativebreastcanceraseermedicarestudy
AT kabospeter evaluatinganthracyclinetaxaneversustaxanebasedchemotherapyinolderwomenwithnodenegativetriplenegativebreastcanceraseermedicarestudy
AT fisherchristinem evaluatinganthracyclinetaxaneversustaxanebasedchemotherapyinolderwomenwithnodenegativetriplenegativebreastcanceraseermedicarestudy
AT meyerelisabeth evaluatinganthracyclinetaxaneversustaxanebasedchemotherapyinolderwomenwithnodenegativetriplenegativebreastcanceraseermedicarestudy
AT molinaelizabeth evaluatinganthracyclinetaxaneversustaxanebasedchemotherapyinolderwomenwithnodenegativetriplenegativebreastcanceraseermedicarestudy
AT kondapallilavanya evaluatinganthracyclinetaxaneversustaxanebasedchemotherapyinolderwomenwithnodenegativetriplenegativebreastcanceraseermedicarestudy
AT bradleycathyj evaluatinganthracyclinetaxaneversustaxanebasedchemotherapyinolderwomenwithnodenegativetriplenegativebreastcanceraseermedicarestudy
AT diamondjenniferr evaluatinganthracyclinetaxaneversustaxanebasedchemotherapyinolderwomenwithnodenegativetriplenegativebreastcanceraseermedicarestudy