Cargando…

Bactericidal activity of three different antiseptic ophthalmic preparations as surgical prophylaxis

PURPOSE: In the era of antibiotic resistance, there is an increased interest in antiseptic solutions that might represent a reliable option for ocular surface disinfection. The objective of this study is to compare for the first time three different antiseptic ophthalmic preparations to assess their...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tognetto, Daniele, Pastore, Marco R., Guerin, Gian Marco, Decorti, Giuliana, Franzin, Martina, Lagatolla, Cristina, Cirigliano, Gabriella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8763824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34427741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05361-3
_version_ 1784634036069597184
author Tognetto, Daniele
Pastore, Marco R.
Guerin, Gian Marco
Decorti, Giuliana
Franzin, Martina
Lagatolla, Cristina
Cirigliano, Gabriella
author_facet Tognetto, Daniele
Pastore, Marco R.
Guerin, Gian Marco
Decorti, Giuliana
Franzin, Martina
Lagatolla, Cristina
Cirigliano, Gabriella
author_sort Tognetto, Daniele
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In the era of antibiotic resistance, there is an increased interest in antiseptic solutions that might represent a reliable option for ocular surface disinfection. The objective of this study is to compare for the first time three different antiseptic ophthalmic preparations to assess their in vitro antimicrobial activity. METHODS: The antiseptic activity of three commercial ophthalmic solutions, IODIM (povidone-iodine 0.6% in hyaluronic acid vehicle—Medivis, Catania, Italy), OZODROP (nanoemulsion with ozonated oil—concentration not specified—FBVision, Ophthalmic Pharmaceuticals, Rome, Italy), and DROPSEPT (chlorhexidine 0.02% and vitamin E 0.5% Tocopherol Polyethylene Glycol 1000 Succinate—TPGS, Sooft Italia, Montegiorgio, Italy), was tested in vitro on six reference strains by time-killing assays. Viable cells were evaluated after 1, 15, 30 min; 2, 6, and 24 h exposure by seeding 100 µl of the suspension (or appropriate dilutions) on LB agar or Sabouraud-dextrose agar. All plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and evaluated by manually counting the colonies. RESULTS: IODIM solution showed a very rapid microbicidal activity: the number of viable cells for all the tested strains was under the detection limit (less than 10 CFU/ml) already after 1 min exposure, and this result was maintained at every incubation time. The rapid antimicrobial activity of povidone-iodine was not replicated when testing the other two antiseptics. CONCLUSIONS: The study reports the great efficacy in reducing bacterial load in a very short time of povidone-iodine 0.6% compared with other antiseptic preparations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8763824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87638242022-01-31 Bactericidal activity of three different antiseptic ophthalmic preparations as surgical prophylaxis Tognetto, Daniele Pastore, Marco R. Guerin, Gian Marco Decorti, Giuliana Franzin, Martina Lagatolla, Cristina Cirigliano, Gabriella Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Medical Ophthalmology PURPOSE: In the era of antibiotic resistance, there is an increased interest in antiseptic solutions that might represent a reliable option for ocular surface disinfection. The objective of this study is to compare for the first time three different antiseptic ophthalmic preparations to assess their in vitro antimicrobial activity. METHODS: The antiseptic activity of three commercial ophthalmic solutions, IODIM (povidone-iodine 0.6% in hyaluronic acid vehicle—Medivis, Catania, Italy), OZODROP (nanoemulsion with ozonated oil—concentration not specified—FBVision, Ophthalmic Pharmaceuticals, Rome, Italy), and DROPSEPT (chlorhexidine 0.02% and vitamin E 0.5% Tocopherol Polyethylene Glycol 1000 Succinate—TPGS, Sooft Italia, Montegiorgio, Italy), was tested in vitro on six reference strains by time-killing assays. Viable cells were evaluated after 1, 15, 30 min; 2, 6, and 24 h exposure by seeding 100 µl of the suspension (or appropriate dilutions) on LB agar or Sabouraud-dextrose agar. All plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and evaluated by manually counting the colonies. RESULTS: IODIM solution showed a very rapid microbicidal activity: the number of viable cells for all the tested strains was under the detection limit (less than 10 CFU/ml) already after 1 min exposure, and this result was maintained at every incubation time. The rapid antimicrobial activity of povidone-iodine was not replicated when testing the other two antiseptics. CONCLUSIONS: The study reports the great efficacy in reducing bacterial load in a very short time of povidone-iodine 0.6% compared with other antiseptic preparations. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-08-24 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8763824/ /pubmed/34427741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05361-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Medical Ophthalmology
Tognetto, Daniele
Pastore, Marco R.
Guerin, Gian Marco
Decorti, Giuliana
Franzin, Martina
Lagatolla, Cristina
Cirigliano, Gabriella
Bactericidal activity of three different antiseptic ophthalmic preparations as surgical prophylaxis
title Bactericidal activity of three different antiseptic ophthalmic preparations as surgical prophylaxis
title_full Bactericidal activity of three different antiseptic ophthalmic preparations as surgical prophylaxis
title_fullStr Bactericidal activity of three different antiseptic ophthalmic preparations as surgical prophylaxis
title_full_unstemmed Bactericidal activity of three different antiseptic ophthalmic preparations as surgical prophylaxis
title_short Bactericidal activity of three different antiseptic ophthalmic preparations as surgical prophylaxis
title_sort bactericidal activity of three different antiseptic ophthalmic preparations as surgical prophylaxis
topic Medical Ophthalmology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8763824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34427741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05361-3
work_keys_str_mv AT tognettodaniele bactericidalactivityofthreedifferentantisepticophthalmicpreparationsassurgicalprophylaxis
AT pastoremarcor bactericidalactivityofthreedifferentantisepticophthalmicpreparationsassurgicalprophylaxis
AT gueringianmarco bactericidalactivityofthreedifferentantisepticophthalmicpreparationsassurgicalprophylaxis
AT decortigiuliana bactericidalactivityofthreedifferentantisepticophthalmicpreparationsassurgicalprophylaxis
AT franzinmartina bactericidalactivityofthreedifferentantisepticophthalmicpreparationsassurgicalprophylaxis
AT lagatollacristina bactericidalactivityofthreedifferentantisepticophthalmicpreparationsassurgicalprophylaxis
AT ciriglianogabriella bactericidalactivityofthreedifferentantisepticophthalmicpreparationsassurgicalprophylaxis