Cargando…

A colonoscopy quality improvement intervention in an endoscopy unit

Many studies identified colonoscopy quality indicators in order to improve performance and safety. We conducted a colonoscopy improvement study. Our study was designed according to a Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle: first recording of our quality indicators and identification of shortcomings, second identif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palmier, Rémi, Degand, Thibault, Aho, Serge, Lepage, Côme, Facy, Olivier, Michiels, Christophe, Manfredi, Sylvain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8763865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35039559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-04786-y
_version_ 1784634045062184960
author Palmier, Rémi
Degand, Thibault
Aho, Serge
Lepage, Côme
Facy, Olivier
Michiels, Christophe
Manfredi, Sylvain
author_facet Palmier, Rémi
Degand, Thibault
Aho, Serge
Lepage, Côme
Facy, Olivier
Michiels, Christophe
Manfredi, Sylvain
author_sort Palmier, Rémi
collection PubMed
description Many studies identified colonoscopy quality indicators in order to improve performance and safety. We conducted a colonoscopy improvement study. Our study was designed according to a Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle: first recording of our quality indicators and identification of shortcomings, second identification of improvement targets and implementation of new procedures, third second recording of quality indicators, fourth validation of procedures and identification of new goals. Quality indicators derived from European and French guidelines were recorded before and after our improvement actions. We were mainly interested in the quality indicators of the colonic preparation, the description of the diagnosed lesions and on the examination reports. The data of 134 patients prospectively included in January–February 2017 were compared to 133 patients included in May–June 2019, after implementation of improvement procedures, in the digestive endoscopy unit of the university hospital of Dijon, France. Our intervention, and in particular the implementation of new standardized forms, improved preparation quality: Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores increased significantly from 7.8 to 8.2. Cecal intubation rate increased by 6%, and more adenomas were diagnosed and removed (+3.3%). Adenoma detection rate increased significantly from 26 to 42%. The completion of withdrawal time measure improved from 6.7 to 100%. Our study led to the rapid implementation of corrective actions and improved quality in our unit and in our personal practice. This quality improvement strategy could be easily implemented in every digestive endoscopy unit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8763865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87638652022-01-18 A colonoscopy quality improvement intervention in an endoscopy unit Palmier, Rémi Degand, Thibault Aho, Serge Lepage, Côme Facy, Olivier Michiels, Christophe Manfredi, Sylvain Sci Rep Article Many studies identified colonoscopy quality indicators in order to improve performance and safety. We conducted a colonoscopy improvement study. Our study was designed according to a Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle: first recording of our quality indicators and identification of shortcomings, second identification of improvement targets and implementation of new procedures, third second recording of quality indicators, fourth validation of procedures and identification of new goals. Quality indicators derived from European and French guidelines were recorded before and after our improvement actions. We were mainly interested in the quality indicators of the colonic preparation, the description of the diagnosed lesions and on the examination reports. The data of 134 patients prospectively included in January–February 2017 were compared to 133 patients included in May–June 2019, after implementation of improvement procedures, in the digestive endoscopy unit of the university hospital of Dijon, France. Our intervention, and in particular the implementation of new standardized forms, improved preparation quality: Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores increased significantly from 7.8 to 8.2. Cecal intubation rate increased by 6%, and more adenomas were diagnosed and removed (+3.3%). Adenoma detection rate increased significantly from 26 to 42%. The completion of withdrawal time measure improved from 6.7 to 100%. Our study led to the rapid implementation of corrective actions and improved quality in our unit and in our personal practice. This quality improvement strategy could be easily implemented in every digestive endoscopy unit. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8763865/ /pubmed/35039559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-04786-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Palmier, Rémi
Degand, Thibault
Aho, Serge
Lepage, Côme
Facy, Olivier
Michiels, Christophe
Manfredi, Sylvain
A colonoscopy quality improvement intervention in an endoscopy unit
title A colonoscopy quality improvement intervention in an endoscopy unit
title_full A colonoscopy quality improvement intervention in an endoscopy unit
title_fullStr A colonoscopy quality improvement intervention in an endoscopy unit
title_full_unstemmed A colonoscopy quality improvement intervention in an endoscopy unit
title_short A colonoscopy quality improvement intervention in an endoscopy unit
title_sort colonoscopy quality improvement intervention in an endoscopy unit
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8763865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35039559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-04786-y
work_keys_str_mv AT palmierremi acolonoscopyqualityimprovementinterventioninanendoscopyunit
AT degandthibault acolonoscopyqualityimprovementinterventioninanendoscopyunit
AT ahoserge acolonoscopyqualityimprovementinterventioninanendoscopyunit
AT lepagecome acolonoscopyqualityimprovementinterventioninanendoscopyunit
AT facyolivier acolonoscopyqualityimprovementinterventioninanendoscopyunit
AT michielschristophe acolonoscopyqualityimprovementinterventioninanendoscopyunit
AT manfredisylvain acolonoscopyqualityimprovementinterventioninanendoscopyunit
AT palmierremi colonoscopyqualityimprovementinterventioninanendoscopyunit
AT degandthibault colonoscopyqualityimprovementinterventioninanendoscopyunit
AT ahoserge colonoscopyqualityimprovementinterventioninanendoscopyunit
AT lepagecome colonoscopyqualityimprovementinterventioninanendoscopyunit
AT facyolivier colonoscopyqualityimprovementinterventioninanendoscopyunit
AT michielschristophe colonoscopyqualityimprovementinterventioninanendoscopyunit
AT manfredisylvain colonoscopyqualityimprovementinterventioninanendoscopyunit