Cargando…
Evaluation eines nutzerorientierten eLearning-Angebots für die Augenheilkunde
BACKGROUND: In medical studies digital learning is often achieved by the use of learning management platforms, such as Ilias. Lecture presentations and organizational documents are typical contents. Students use multiple, mostly external learning options for acquisition of knowledge and competences....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Medizin
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8763945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33404686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00347-020-01306-z |
_version_ | 1784634062164459520 |
---|---|
author | Müller, Andreas Schmidt, Franziska Pfeiffer, Norbert Brill, Anita Prokosch, Verena |
author_facet | Müller, Andreas Schmidt, Franziska Pfeiffer, Norbert Brill, Anita Prokosch, Verena |
author_sort | Müller, Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In medical studies digital learning is often achieved by the use of learning management platforms, such as Ilias. Lecture presentations and organizational documents are typical contents. Students use multiple, mostly external learning options for acquisition of knowledge and competences. We present our updated ophthalmology e‑learning environment for medical students and its evaluation. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of an ophthalmology e‑learning platform for medical students, which considers prevalent learning habits. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The platform should provide and link a selection of internal and external learning resources following anatomical structures of the eye. For every subject area the platform provides a text with essential matters, clinical cases, lecture presentations, multiple choice questions for practice, links to corresponding chapters of a textbook and the appropriate AMBOSS learning cards (Amboss GmbH, Berlin, Germany). At the end of the semester an evaluation of the platform was carried out. Different statements were rated by the students on ordinal scales and analyzed. RESULTS: The platform was rated with 1.47 ± 0.54 (mean ± standard deviation; n = 107) on a German school grade scale (1 = best, 6 = worst). It was perceived as helpful for the individual learning with 1.62 ± 0.77 (1 = very helpful, 7 = not helpful at all). The structuring of the internal and external learning resources was rated as very good 1.44 ± 0.66 (1 = very good, 7 = very bad). The median for subjective amount of usage was 1–5 h (ordinal scale <1, 1–5, 6–10, 15–20, >20 h). CONCLUSION: It appears to be meaningful to specifically link external learning resources corresponding to the own curricular structure in order to provide medical students with a modern basis for learning in ophthalmology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8763945 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Medizin |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87639452022-01-31 Evaluation eines nutzerorientierten eLearning-Angebots für die Augenheilkunde Müller, Andreas Schmidt, Franziska Pfeiffer, Norbert Brill, Anita Prokosch, Verena Ophthalmologe Originalien BACKGROUND: In medical studies digital learning is often achieved by the use of learning management platforms, such as Ilias. Lecture presentations and organizational documents are typical contents. Students use multiple, mostly external learning options for acquisition of knowledge and competences. We present our updated ophthalmology e‑learning environment for medical students and its evaluation. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of an ophthalmology e‑learning platform for medical students, which considers prevalent learning habits. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The platform should provide and link a selection of internal and external learning resources following anatomical structures of the eye. For every subject area the platform provides a text with essential matters, clinical cases, lecture presentations, multiple choice questions for practice, links to corresponding chapters of a textbook and the appropriate AMBOSS learning cards (Amboss GmbH, Berlin, Germany). At the end of the semester an evaluation of the platform was carried out. Different statements were rated by the students on ordinal scales and analyzed. RESULTS: The platform was rated with 1.47 ± 0.54 (mean ± standard deviation; n = 107) on a German school grade scale (1 = best, 6 = worst). It was perceived as helpful for the individual learning with 1.62 ± 0.77 (1 = very helpful, 7 = not helpful at all). The structuring of the internal and external learning resources was rated as very good 1.44 ± 0.66 (1 = very good, 7 = very bad). The median for subjective amount of usage was 1–5 h (ordinal scale <1, 1–5, 6–10, 15–20, >20 h). CONCLUSION: It appears to be meaningful to specifically link external learning resources corresponding to the own curricular structure in order to provide medical students with a modern basis for learning in ophthalmology. Springer Medizin 2021-01-06 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8763945/ /pubmed/33404686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00347-020-01306-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Originalien Müller, Andreas Schmidt, Franziska Pfeiffer, Norbert Brill, Anita Prokosch, Verena Evaluation eines nutzerorientierten eLearning-Angebots für die Augenheilkunde |
title | Evaluation eines nutzerorientierten eLearning-Angebots für die Augenheilkunde |
title_full | Evaluation eines nutzerorientierten eLearning-Angebots für die Augenheilkunde |
title_fullStr | Evaluation eines nutzerorientierten eLearning-Angebots für die Augenheilkunde |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation eines nutzerorientierten eLearning-Angebots für die Augenheilkunde |
title_short | Evaluation eines nutzerorientierten eLearning-Angebots für die Augenheilkunde |
title_sort | evaluation eines nutzerorientierten elearning-angebots für die augenheilkunde |
topic | Originalien |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8763945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33404686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00347-020-01306-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mullerandreas evaluationeinesnutzerorientiertenelearningangebotsfurdieaugenheilkunde AT schmidtfranziska evaluationeinesnutzerorientiertenelearningangebotsfurdieaugenheilkunde AT pfeiffernorbert evaluationeinesnutzerorientiertenelearningangebotsfurdieaugenheilkunde AT brillanita evaluationeinesnutzerorientiertenelearningangebotsfurdieaugenheilkunde AT prokoschverena evaluationeinesnutzerorientiertenelearningangebotsfurdieaugenheilkunde |