Cargando…

Evaluation eines nutzerorientierten eLearning-Angebots für die Augenheilkunde

BACKGROUND: In medical studies digital learning is often achieved by the use of learning management platforms, such as Ilias. Lecture presentations and organizational documents are typical contents. Students use multiple, mostly external learning options for acquisition of knowledge and competences....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Müller, Andreas, Schmidt, Franziska, Pfeiffer, Norbert, Brill, Anita, Prokosch, Verena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8763945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33404686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00347-020-01306-z
_version_ 1784634062164459520
author Müller, Andreas
Schmidt, Franziska
Pfeiffer, Norbert
Brill, Anita
Prokosch, Verena
author_facet Müller, Andreas
Schmidt, Franziska
Pfeiffer, Norbert
Brill, Anita
Prokosch, Verena
author_sort Müller, Andreas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In medical studies digital learning is often achieved by the use of learning management platforms, such as Ilias. Lecture presentations and organizational documents are typical contents. Students use multiple, mostly external learning options for acquisition of knowledge and competences. We present our updated ophthalmology e‑learning environment for medical students and its evaluation. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of an ophthalmology e‑learning platform for medical students, which considers prevalent learning habits. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The platform should provide and link a selection of internal and external learning resources following anatomical structures of the eye. For every subject area the platform provides a text with essential matters, clinical cases, lecture presentations, multiple choice questions for practice, links to corresponding chapters of a textbook and the appropriate AMBOSS learning cards (Amboss GmbH, Berlin, Germany). At the end of the semester an evaluation of the platform was carried out. Different statements were rated by the students on ordinal scales and analyzed. RESULTS: The platform was rated with 1.47 ± 0.54 (mean ± standard deviation; n = 107) on a German school grade scale (1 = best, 6 = worst). It was perceived as helpful for the individual learning with 1.62 ± 0.77 (1 = very helpful, 7 = not helpful at all). The structuring of the internal and external learning resources was rated as very good 1.44 ± 0.66 (1 = very good, 7 = very bad). The median for subjective amount of usage was 1–5 h (ordinal scale <1, 1–5, 6–10, 15–20, >20 h). CONCLUSION: It appears to be meaningful to specifically link external learning resources corresponding to the own curricular structure in order to provide medical students with a modern basis for learning in ophthalmology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8763945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87639452022-01-31 Evaluation eines nutzerorientierten eLearning-Angebots für die Augenheilkunde Müller, Andreas Schmidt, Franziska Pfeiffer, Norbert Brill, Anita Prokosch, Verena Ophthalmologe Originalien BACKGROUND: In medical studies digital learning is often achieved by the use of learning management platforms, such as Ilias. Lecture presentations and organizational documents are typical contents. Students use multiple, mostly external learning options for acquisition of knowledge and competences. We present our updated ophthalmology e‑learning environment for medical students and its evaluation. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of an ophthalmology e‑learning platform for medical students, which considers prevalent learning habits. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The platform should provide and link a selection of internal and external learning resources following anatomical structures of the eye. For every subject area the platform provides a text with essential matters, clinical cases, lecture presentations, multiple choice questions for practice, links to corresponding chapters of a textbook and the appropriate AMBOSS learning cards (Amboss GmbH, Berlin, Germany). At the end of the semester an evaluation of the platform was carried out. Different statements were rated by the students on ordinal scales and analyzed. RESULTS: The platform was rated with 1.47 ± 0.54 (mean ± standard deviation; n = 107) on a German school grade scale (1 = best, 6 = worst). It was perceived as helpful for the individual learning with 1.62 ± 0.77 (1 = very helpful, 7 = not helpful at all). The structuring of the internal and external learning resources was rated as very good 1.44 ± 0.66 (1 = very good, 7 = very bad). The median for subjective amount of usage was 1–5 h (ordinal scale <1, 1–5, 6–10, 15–20, >20 h). CONCLUSION: It appears to be meaningful to specifically link external learning resources corresponding to the own curricular structure in order to provide medical students with a modern basis for learning in ophthalmology. Springer Medizin 2021-01-06 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8763945/ /pubmed/33404686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00347-020-01306-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Originalien
Müller, Andreas
Schmidt, Franziska
Pfeiffer, Norbert
Brill, Anita
Prokosch, Verena
Evaluation eines nutzerorientierten eLearning-Angebots für die Augenheilkunde
title Evaluation eines nutzerorientierten eLearning-Angebots für die Augenheilkunde
title_full Evaluation eines nutzerorientierten eLearning-Angebots für die Augenheilkunde
title_fullStr Evaluation eines nutzerorientierten eLearning-Angebots für die Augenheilkunde
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation eines nutzerorientierten eLearning-Angebots für die Augenheilkunde
title_short Evaluation eines nutzerorientierten eLearning-Angebots für die Augenheilkunde
title_sort evaluation eines nutzerorientierten elearning-angebots für die augenheilkunde
topic Originalien
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8763945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33404686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00347-020-01306-z
work_keys_str_mv AT mullerandreas evaluationeinesnutzerorientiertenelearningangebotsfurdieaugenheilkunde
AT schmidtfranziska evaluationeinesnutzerorientiertenelearningangebotsfurdieaugenheilkunde
AT pfeiffernorbert evaluationeinesnutzerorientiertenelearningangebotsfurdieaugenheilkunde
AT brillanita evaluationeinesnutzerorientiertenelearningangebotsfurdieaugenheilkunde
AT prokoschverena evaluationeinesnutzerorientiertenelearningangebotsfurdieaugenheilkunde