Cargando…
Speech air flow with and without face masks
Face masks slow exhaled air flow and sequester exhaled particles. There are many types of face masks on the market today, each having widely varying fits, filtering, and air redirection characteristics. While particle filtration and flow resistance from masks has been well studied, their effects on...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8763952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35039580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04745-z |
_version_ | 1784634063614640128 |
---|---|
author | Derrick, Donald Kabaliuk, Natalia Longworth, Luke Pishyar-Dehkordi, Peiman Jermy, Mark |
author_facet | Derrick, Donald Kabaliuk, Natalia Longworth, Luke Pishyar-Dehkordi, Peiman Jermy, Mark |
author_sort | Derrick, Donald |
collection | PubMed |
description | Face masks slow exhaled air flow and sequester exhaled particles. There are many types of face masks on the market today, each having widely varying fits, filtering, and air redirection characteristics. While particle filtration and flow resistance from masks has been well studied, their effects on speech air flow has not. We built a schlieren system and recorded speech air flow with 14 different face masks, comparing it to mask-less speech. All of the face masks reduced air flow from speech, but some allowed air flow features to reach further than 40 cm from a speaker’s lips and nose within a few seconds, and all the face masks allowed some air to escape above the nose. Evidence from available literature shows that distancing and ventilation in higher-risk indoor environment provide more benefit than wearing a face mask. Our own research shows all the masks we tested provide some additional benefit of restricting air flow from a speaker. However, well-fitted mask specifically designed for the purpose of preventing the spread of disease reduce air flow the most. Future research will study the effects of face masks on speech communication in order to facilitate cost/benefit analysis of mask usage in various environments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8763952 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87639522022-01-18 Speech air flow with and without face masks Derrick, Donald Kabaliuk, Natalia Longworth, Luke Pishyar-Dehkordi, Peiman Jermy, Mark Sci Rep Article Face masks slow exhaled air flow and sequester exhaled particles. There are many types of face masks on the market today, each having widely varying fits, filtering, and air redirection characteristics. While particle filtration and flow resistance from masks has been well studied, their effects on speech air flow has not. We built a schlieren system and recorded speech air flow with 14 different face masks, comparing it to mask-less speech. All of the face masks reduced air flow from speech, but some allowed air flow features to reach further than 40 cm from a speaker’s lips and nose within a few seconds, and all the face masks allowed some air to escape above the nose. Evidence from available literature shows that distancing and ventilation in higher-risk indoor environment provide more benefit than wearing a face mask. Our own research shows all the masks we tested provide some additional benefit of restricting air flow from a speaker. However, well-fitted mask specifically designed for the purpose of preventing the spread of disease reduce air flow the most. Future research will study the effects of face masks on speech communication in order to facilitate cost/benefit analysis of mask usage in various environments. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8763952/ /pubmed/35039580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04745-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Derrick, Donald Kabaliuk, Natalia Longworth, Luke Pishyar-Dehkordi, Peiman Jermy, Mark Speech air flow with and without face masks |
title | Speech air flow with and without face masks |
title_full | Speech air flow with and without face masks |
title_fullStr | Speech air flow with and without face masks |
title_full_unstemmed | Speech air flow with and without face masks |
title_short | Speech air flow with and without face masks |
title_sort | speech air flow with and without face masks |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8763952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35039580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04745-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT derrickdonald speechairflowwithandwithoutfacemasks AT kabaliuknatalia speechairflowwithandwithoutfacemasks AT longworthluke speechairflowwithandwithoutfacemasks AT pishyardehkordipeiman speechairflowwithandwithoutfacemasks AT jermymark speechairflowwithandwithoutfacemasks |