Cargando…

Development and Validation of a Novel Microbiome-Based Biomarker of Post-antibiotic Dysbiosis and Subsequent Restoration

Background: The human gut microbiota are important to health and wellness, and disrupted microbiota homeostasis, or “dysbiosis,” can cause or contribute to many gastrointestinal disease states. Dysbiosis can be caused by many factors, most notably antibiotic treatment. To correct dysbiosis and resto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blount, Ken, Jones, Courtney, Walsh, Dana, Gonzalez, Carlos, Shannon, William D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8764365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35058900
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.781275
_version_ 1784634147695755264
author Blount, Ken
Jones, Courtney
Walsh, Dana
Gonzalez, Carlos
Shannon, William D.
author_facet Blount, Ken
Jones, Courtney
Walsh, Dana
Gonzalez, Carlos
Shannon, William D.
author_sort Blount, Ken
collection PubMed
description Background: The human gut microbiota are important to health and wellness, and disrupted microbiota homeostasis, or “dysbiosis,” can cause or contribute to many gastrointestinal disease states. Dysbiosis can be caused by many factors, most notably antibiotic treatment. To correct dysbiosis and restore healthier microbiota, several investigational microbiota-based live biotherapeutic products (LBPs) are in formal clinical development. To better guide and refine LBP development and to better understand and manage the risks of antibiotic administration, biomarkers that distinguish post-antibiotic dysbiosis from healthy microbiota are needed. Here we report the development of a prototype Microbiome Health Index for post-Antibiotic dysbiosis (MHI-A). Methods: MHI-A was developed and validated using longitudinal gut microbiome data from participants in clinical trials of RBX2660 and RBX7455 – investigational LBPs in development for reducing recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections (rCDI). The MHI-A algorithm relates the relative abundances of microbiome taxonomic classes that changed the most after RBX2660 or RBX7455 treatment, that strongly correlated with clinical response, and that reflect biological mechanisms believed important to rCDI. The diagnostic utility of MHI-A was reinforced using publicly available microbiome data from healthy or antibiotic-treated populations. Results: MHI-A has high accuracy to distinguish post-antibiotic dysbiosis from healthy microbiota. MHI-A values were consistent across multiple healthy populations and were significantly shifted by antibiotic treatments known to alter microbiota compositions, shifted less by microbiota-sparing antibiotics. Clinical response to RBX2660 and RBX7455 correlated with a shift of MHI-A from dysbiotic to healthy values. Conclusion: MHI-A is a promising biomarker of post-antibiotic dysbiosis and subsequent restoration. MHI-A may be useful for rank-ordering the microbiota-disrupting effects of antibiotics and as a pharmacodynamic measure of microbiota restoration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8764365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87643652022-01-19 Development and Validation of a Novel Microbiome-Based Biomarker of Post-antibiotic Dysbiosis and Subsequent Restoration Blount, Ken Jones, Courtney Walsh, Dana Gonzalez, Carlos Shannon, William D. Front Microbiol Microbiology Background: The human gut microbiota are important to health and wellness, and disrupted microbiota homeostasis, or “dysbiosis,” can cause or contribute to many gastrointestinal disease states. Dysbiosis can be caused by many factors, most notably antibiotic treatment. To correct dysbiosis and restore healthier microbiota, several investigational microbiota-based live biotherapeutic products (LBPs) are in formal clinical development. To better guide and refine LBP development and to better understand and manage the risks of antibiotic administration, biomarkers that distinguish post-antibiotic dysbiosis from healthy microbiota are needed. Here we report the development of a prototype Microbiome Health Index for post-Antibiotic dysbiosis (MHI-A). Methods: MHI-A was developed and validated using longitudinal gut microbiome data from participants in clinical trials of RBX2660 and RBX7455 – investigational LBPs in development for reducing recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections (rCDI). The MHI-A algorithm relates the relative abundances of microbiome taxonomic classes that changed the most after RBX2660 or RBX7455 treatment, that strongly correlated with clinical response, and that reflect biological mechanisms believed important to rCDI. The diagnostic utility of MHI-A was reinforced using publicly available microbiome data from healthy or antibiotic-treated populations. Results: MHI-A has high accuracy to distinguish post-antibiotic dysbiosis from healthy microbiota. MHI-A values were consistent across multiple healthy populations and were significantly shifted by antibiotic treatments known to alter microbiota compositions, shifted less by microbiota-sparing antibiotics. Clinical response to RBX2660 and RBX7455 correlated with a shift of MHI-A from dysbiotic to healthy values. Conclusion: MHI-A is a promising biomarker of post-antibiotic dysbiosis and subsequent restoration. MHI-A may be useful for rank-ordering the microbiota-disrupting effects of antibiotics and as a pharmacodynamic measure of microbiota restoration. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8764365/ /pubmed/35058900 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.781275 Text en Copyright © 2022 Blount, Jones, Walsh, Gonzalez and Shannon. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Blount, Ken
Jones, Courtney
Walsh, Dana
Gonzalez, Carlos
Shannon, William D.
Development and Validation of a Novel Microbiome-Based Biomarker of Post-antibiotic Dysbiosis and Subsequent Restoration
title Development and Validation of a Novel Microbiome-Based Biomarker of Post-antibiotic Dysbiosis and Subsequent Restoration
title_full Development and Validation of a Novel Microbiome-Based Biomarker of Post-antibiotic Dysbiosis and Subsequent Restoration
title_fullStr Development and Validation of a Novel Microbiome-Based Biomarker of Post-antibiotic Dysbiosis and Subsequent Restoration
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of a Novel Microbiome-Based Biomarker of Post-antibiotic Dysbiosis and Subsequent Restoration
title_short Development and Validation of a Novel Microbiome-Based Biomarker of Post-antibiotic Dysbiosis and Subsequent Restoration
title_sort development and validation of a novel microbiome-based biomarker of post-antibiotic dysbiosis and subsequent restoration
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8764365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35058900
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.781275
work_keys_str_mv AT blountken developmentandvalidationofanovelmicrobiomebasedbiomarkerofpostantibioticdysbiosisandsubsequentrestoration
AT jonescourtney developmentandvalidationofanovelmicrobiomebasedbiomarkerofpostantibioticdysbiosisandsubsequentrestoration
AT walshdana developmentandvalidationofanovelmicrobiomebasedbiomarkerofpostantibioticdysbiosisandsubsequentrestoration
AT gonzalezcarlos developmentandvalidationofanovelmicrobiomebasedbiomarkerofpostantibioticdysbiosisandsubsequentrestoration
AT shannonwilliamd developmentandvalidationofanovelmicrobiomebasedbiomarkerofpostantibioticdysbiosisandsubsequentrestoration