Cargando…

Comparing proximal convergence ratio in myopes

Aim: To determine if there is a difference at all in proximal convergence to accommodation ratio (PC/ A) between 2 myopic groups. Group A: -0.50D < SE < 3.00D, SE: spherical equivalent, D: Diopter) and Group B (-3.00D SE and above). Patients and methods: In this prospective observational study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vivekanand, Undrakonda, Lobo, Sarita Gonsalves, Dharmappa, Navya, Kesireddy, Alekya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Romanian Society of Ophthalmology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8764421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35087977
http://dx.doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2021.71
Descripción
Sumario:Aim: To determine if there is a difference at all in proximal convergence to accommodation ratio (PC/ A) between 2 myopic groups. Group A: -0.50D < SE < 3.00D, SE: spherical equivalent, D: Diopter) and Group B (-3.00D SE and above). Patients and methods: In this prospective observational study, 24 consecutive patients with myopia between -0.50D < SE < 3.00D were included in group A and 27 consecutive patients with myopia > -3.00 D SE were included in group B. Patients with pathological myopia, strabismus or heterophoria anomalies were excluded. The PC/ A ratio for both the groups were calculated by measuring the difference between value of accommodative convergence to accommodation ratio (AC/ A) derived from heterophoria and gradient method using a prism bar method. Statistical analysis was performed by analyzing descriptive statistics and the independent sample t-test using SPSS ver. 22.0 software. Results: The average calculated PC/ A ratio was 3.24∆/ D (SD = +0.68/ D) in group B (n=27) and 2.6∆/ D (SD = 0.86/ D) in group A (n=24) (p value <0.05). Conclusion: An evident high AC/ A ratio in group B patients with myopia more than -3.00 D was the predominant cause for high PC/ A ratio in group B patients.