Cargando…

Groupitizing modifies neural coding of numerosity

Numerical estimation of arrays of objects is faster and more accurate when items can be clustered into groups, a phenomenon termed “groupitizing.” Grouping can facilitate segregation into subitizable “chunks,” each easily estimated, then summed. The current study investigates whether spatial groupin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maldonado Moscoso, Paula A., Greenlee, Mark W., Anobile, Giovanni, Arrighi, Roberto, Burr, David C., Castaldi, Elisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8764479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34877718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25694
_version_ 1784634175788154880
author Maldonado Moscoso, Paula A.
Greenlee, Mark W.
Anobile, Giovanni
Arrighi, Roberto
Burr, David C.
Castaldi, Elisa
author_facet Maldonado Moscoso, Paula A.
Greenlee, Mark W.
Anobile, Giovanni
Arrighi, Roberto
Burr, David C.
Castaldi, Elisa
author_sort Maldonado Moscoso, Paula A.
collection PubMed
description Numerical estimation of arrays of objects is faster and more accurate when items can be clustered into groups, a phenomenon termed “groupitizing.” Grouping can facilitate segregation into subitizable “chunks,” each easily estimated, then summed. The current study investigates whether spatial grouping of arrays drives specific neural responses during numerical estimation, reflecting strategies such as exact calculation and fact retrieval. Fourteen adults were scanned with fMRI while estimating either the numerosity or shape of arrays of items, either randomly distributed or spatially grouped. Numerosity estimation of both classes of stimuli elicited common activation of a right lateralized frontoparietal network. Grouped stimuli additionally recruited regions in the left hemisphere and bilaterally in the angular gyrus. Multivariate pattern analysis showed that classifiers trained with the pattern of neural activations read out from parietal regions, but not from the primary visual areas, can decode different numerosities both within and across spatial arrangements. The behavioral numerical acuity correlated with the decoding performance of the parietal but not with occipital regions. Overall, this experiment suggests that the estimation of grouped stimuli relies on the approximate number system for numerosity estimation, but additionally recruits regions involved in calculation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8764479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87644792022-01-21 Groupitizing modifies neural coding of numerosity Maldonado Moscoso, Paula A. Greenlee, Mark W. Anobile, Giovanni Arrighi, Roberto Burr, David C. Castaldi, Elisa Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Numerical estimation of arrays of objects is faster and more accurate when items can be clustered into groups, a phenomenon termed “groupitizing.” Grouping can facilitate segregation into subitizable “chunks,” each easily estimated, then summed. The current study investigates whether spatial grouping of arrays drives specific neural responses during numerical estimation, reflecting strategies such as exact calculation and fact retrieval. Fourteen adults were scanned with fMRI while estimating either the numerosity or shape of arrays of items, either randomly distributed or spatially grouped. Numerosity estimation of both classes of stimuli elicited common activation of a right lateralized frontoparietal network. Grouped stimuli additionally recruited regions in the left hemisphere and bilaterally in the angular gyrus. Multivariate pattern analysis showed that classifiers trained with the pattern of neural activations read out from parietal regions, but not from the primary visual areas, can decode different numerosities both within and across spatial arrangements. The behavioral numerical acuity correlated with the decoding performance of the parietal but not with occipital regions. Overall, this experiment suggests that the estimation of grouped stimuli relies on the approximate number system for numerosity estimation, but additionally recruits regions involved in calculation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8764479/ /pubmed/34877718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25694 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Maldonado Moscoso, Paula A.
Greenlee, Mark W.
Anobile, Giovanni
Arrighi, Roberto
Burr, David C.
Castaldi, Elisa
Groupitizing modifies neural coding of numerosity
title Groupitizing modifies neural coding of numerosity
title_full Groupitizing modifies neural coding of numerosity
title_fullStr Groupitizing modifies neural coding of numerosity
title_full_unstemmed Groupitizing modifies neural coding of numerosity
title_short Groupitizing modifies neural coding of numerosity
title_sort groupitizing modifies neural coding of numerosity
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8764479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34877718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25694
work_keys_str_mv AT maldonadomoscosopaulaa groupitizingmodifiesneuralcodingofnumerosity
AT greenleemarkw groupitizingmodifiesneuralcodingofnumerosity
AT anobilegiovanni groupitizingmodifiesneuralcodingofnumerosity
AT arrighiroberto groupitizingmodifiesneuralcodingofnumerosity
AT burrdavidc groupitizingmodifiesneuralcodingofnumerosity
AT castaldielisa groupitizingmodifiesneuralcodingofnumerosity