Cargando…

Ceramic-on-ceramic versus ceramic-on-polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study at a minimum of 13 years follow-up

BACKGROUND: Nowadays hip replacement is one of the most successful surgery in terms of clinical outcome and patient’s satisfaction. Therefore, the choice of biomaterials in hip replacement is increasingly important with the aim of obtaining a long-term satisfaction of patient and a greater survivors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giuseppe, Malerba, Mattia, Basilico, Nadia, Bonfiglio, Raffaele, Vitiello, Pasquale, Ruberto, Stefano, D’ Adamio, Mattia, Sirgiovanni, Vincenzo, De Santis, Giulio, Maccauro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8764755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35039021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04950-x
_version_ 1784634228079591424
author Giuseppe, Malerba
Mattia, Basilico
Nadia, Bonfiglio
Raffaele, Vitiello
Pasquale, Ruberto
Stefano, D’ Adamio
Mattia, Sirgiovanni
Vincenzo, De Santis
Giulio, Maccauro
author_facet Giuseppe, Malerba
Mattia, Basilico
Nadia, Bonfiglio
Raffaele, Vitiello
Pasquale, Ruberto
Stefano, D’ Adamio
Mattia, Sirgiovanni
Vincenzo, De Santis
Giulio, Maccauro
author_sort Giuseppe, Malerba
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nowadays hip replacement is one of the most successful surgery in terms of clinical outcome and patient’s satisfaction. Therefore, the choice of biomaterials in hip replacement is increasingly important with the aim of obtaining a long-term satisfaction of patient and a greater survivorship of the implants. Ceramic-on-polyethylene (COP) and ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings are two common coupling used in total hip arthroplasty. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes between patients treated using CoC and CoP THA at a mean follow-up of 15 years. METHODS: 86 patients, average age 65.6, were included in the study: 43 in group A bearing CoC and 43 in group B bearing CoP. Minimum follow-up was 13 years. Primary outcome was a clinical evaluation assessed by HOOS and SF-12 questionnaires. Secondary outcome was a radiological evaluation on a A-P pelvis x-ray calculating acetabular cup inclination and anteversion and detecting osteolysis. RESULT: After a multivariate analysis was performed, our results show clinical outcomes in group B significantly better than in group A: statistically significant value (p < 0,05) was found in the mean HOOS-symptoms subscale (83.0 ± 15.4 in Group A vs 90.3 ± 12.2 in group B) in the SF-12 physical component score (39.7 ± 11.0 in Group A vs 48.1 ± 10.1 in group B) and in HOOS (79.0 ± 16 in Group A vs 87.0 ± 16 in group B). 3 squeaking was found in group A. The calculated mean acetabular cup inclination value was 44,87 in group A and 44,5 in group B and the mean socket version was 17,54 in group A and 15,10 in group B. No significant statistically relationship between radiographic parameters analyzed and clinical outcomes was noted. CONCLUSION: The current results provide us important information about the THA long-term outcome. CoP offered significantly better results compared with CoC at long-term follow up, and thus it should be considered in the choose of bearing in THA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8764755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87647552022-01-18 Ceramic-on-ceramic versus ceramic-on-polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study at a minimum of 13 years follow-up Giuseppe, Malerba Mattia, Basilico Nadia, Bonfiglio Raffaele, Vitiello Pasquale, Ruberto Stefano, D’ Adamio Mattia, Sirgiovanni Vincenzo, De Santis Giulio, Maccauro BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Nowadays hip replacement is one of the most successful surgery in terms of clinical outcome and patient’s satisfaction. Therefore, the choice of biomaterials in hip replacement is increasingly important with the aim of obtaining a long-term satisfaction of patient and a greater survivorship of the implants. Ceramic-on-polyethylene (COP) and ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings are two common coupling used in total hip arthroplasty. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes between patients treated using CoC and CoP THA at a mean follow-up of 15 years. METHODS: 86 patients, average age 65.6, were included in the study: 43 in group A bearing CoC and 43 in group B bearing CoP. Minimum follow-up was 13 years. Primary outcome was a clinical evaluation assessed by HOOS and SF-12 questionnaires. Secondary outcome was a radiological evaluation on a A-P pelvis x-ray calculating acetabular cup inclination and anteversion and detecting osteolysis. RESULT: After a multivariate analysis was performed, our results show clinical outcomes in group B significantly better than in group A: statistically significant value (p < 0,05) was found in the mean HOOS-symptoms subscale (83.0 ± 15.4 in Group A vs 90.3 ± 12.2 in group B) in the SF-12 physical component score (39.7 ± 11.0 in Group A vs 48.1 ± 10.1 in group B) and in HOOS (79.0 ± 16 in Group A vs 87.0 ± 16 in group B). 3 squeaking was found in group A. The calculated mean acetabular cup inclination value was 44,87 in group A and 44,5 in group B and the mean socket version was 17,54 in group A and 15,10 in group B. No significant statistically relationship between radiographic parameters analyzed and clinical outcomes was noted. CONCLUSION: The current results provide us important information about the THA long-term outcome. CoP offered significantly better results compared with CoC at long-term follow up, and thus it should be considered in the choose of bearing in THA. BioMed Central 2022-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8764755/ /pubmed/35039021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04950-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Giuseppe, Malerba
Mattia, Basilico
Nadia, Bonfiglio
Raffaele, Vitiello
Pasquale, Ruberto
Stefano, D’ Adamio
Mattia, Sirgiovanni
Vincenzo, De Santis
Giulio, Maccauro
Ceramic-on-ceramic versus ceramic-on-polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study at a minimum of 13 years follow-up
title Ceramic-on-ceramic versus ceramic-on-polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study at a minimum of 13 years follow-up
title_full Ceramic-on-ceramic versus ceramic-on-polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study at a minimum of 13 years follow-up
title_fullStr Ceramic-on-ceramic versus ceramic-on-polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study at a minimum of 13 years follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Ceramic-on-ceramic versus ceramic-on-polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study at a minimum of 13 years follow-up
title_short Ceramic-on-ceramic versus ceramic-on-polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study at a minimum of 13 years follow-up
title_sort ceramic-on-ceramic versus ceramic-on-polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study at a minimum of 13 years follow-up
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8764755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35039021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04950-x
work_keys_str_mv AT giuseppemalerba ceramiconceramicversusceramiconpolyethyleneintotalhiparthroplastyacomparativestudyataminimumof13yearsfollowup
AT mattiabasilico ceramiconceramicversusceramiconpolyethyleneintotalhiparthroplastyacomparativestudyataminimumof13yearsfollowup
AT nadiabonfiglio ceramiconceramicversusceramiconpolyethyleneintotalhiparthroplastyacomparativestudyataminimumof13yearsfollowup
AT raffaelevitiello ceramiconceramicversusceramiconpolyethyleneintotalhiparthroplastyacomparativestudyataminimumof13yearsfollowup
AT pasqualeruberto ceramiconceramicversusceramiconpolyethyleneintotalhiparthroplastyacomparativestudyataminimumof13yearsfollowup
AT stefanodadamio ceramiconceramicversusceramiconpolyethyleneintotalhiparthroplastyacomparativestudyataminimumof13yearsfollowup
AT mattiasirgiovanni ceramiconceramicversusceramiconpolyethyleneintotalhiparthroplastyacomparativestudyataminimumof13yearsfollowup
AT vincenzodesantis ceramiconceramicversusceramiconpolyethyleneintotalhiparthroplastyacomparativestudyataminimumof13yearsfollowup
AT giuliomaccauro ceramiconceramicversusceramiconpolyethyleneintotalhiparthroplastyacomparativestudyataminimumof13yearsfollowup