Cargando…

Exploring research capacity and culture of allied health professionals: a mixed methods evaluation

BACKGROUND: Despite the myriad benefits of research to patients, professionals, and organisations, fewer than 0.1% of the Allied Health Professions workforce are employed in clinical academic roles. Identified barriers include a lack of role modelling, management support, funding, and availability o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cordrey, Terry, King, Elizabeth, Pilkington, Emma, Gore, Katie, Gustafson, Owen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8764821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35039018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07480-x
_version_ 1784634241824325632
author Cordrey, Terry
King, Elizabeth
Pilkington, Emma
Gore, Katie
Gustafson, Owen
author_facet Cordrey, Terry
King, Elizabeth
Pilkington, Emma
Gore, Katie
Gustafson, Owen
author_sort Cordrey, Terry
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the myriad benefits of research to patients, professionals, and organisations, fewer than 0.1% of the Allied Health Professions workforce are employed in clinical academic roles. Identified barriers include a lack of role modelling, management support, funding, and availability of clinical academic roles. Research capacity building is critical to improving Allied Health Professional research capability. The aim of this evaluation was to explore the current research capacity and culture of Allied Health Professionals to inform future tailored research capacity building strategies at a local level. METHODS: A mixed methods evaluation of research capacity and culture was conducted within the Allied Health Professions department of a large National Health Service Foundation Trust using an online research capacity and culture questionnaire, followed by focus groups. Staff were recruited using a purposive method with the questionnaire and subsequent focus groups completed between July and September 2020. Data from the questionnaire was analysed using simple descriptive statistics and after inductive coding, focus group data was analysed thematically. RESULTS: 93 out of 278 staff completed the questionnaire and 60 staff members attended seven focus groups. The research capacity and culture survey reported the department’s key strength as promoting clinical practice based on evidence (median=8, range=6-9). A key reported weakness of the department was insufficient resources to support staff research training (med=4, 3-6). Respondents considered themselves most skilled in finding relevant literature (med=6, 5-8) and least skilled at securing research funding (med=1, 1-2). Greater than half of the respondents (n=50) reported not currently being involved with research. Five themes were identified from the focus groups: empowerment; building research infrastructure; fostering research skills; access for all; and positive research culture. CONCLUSIONS: Allied Health Professionals recognise the benefits of research at teams and departmental level, but marginally at an individual level. Local research capacity building strategies should aim to address the role, responsibilities and barriers to Allied Health Profession research development at an individual level. To ensure all staff can engage, research infrastructure and empowerment are essential. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07480-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8764821
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87648212022-01-18 Exploring research capacity and culture of allied health professionals: a mixed methods evaluation Cordrey, Terry King, Elizabeth Pilkington, Emma Gore, Katie Gustafson, Owen BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Despite the myriad benefits of research to patients, professionals, and organisations, fewer than 0.1% of the Allied Health Professions workforce are employed in clinical academic roles. Identified barriers include a lack of role modelling, management support, funding, and availability of clinical academic roles. Research capacity building is critical to improving Allied Health Professional research capability. The aim of this evaluation was to explore the current research capacity and culture of Allied Health Professionals to inform future tailored research capacity building strategies at a local level. METHODS: A mixed methods evaluation of research capacity and culture was conducted within the Allied Health Professions department of a large National Health Service Foundation Trust using an online research capacity and culture questionnaire, followed by focus groups. Staff were recruited using a purposive method with the questionnaire and subsequent focus groups completed between July and September 2020. Data from the questionnaire was analysed using simple descriptive statistics and after inductive coding, focus group data was analysed thematically. RESULTS: 93 out of 278 staff completed the questionnaire and 60 staff members attended seven focus groups. The research capacity and culture survey reported the department’s key strength as promoting clinical practice based on evidence (median=8, range=6-9). A key reported weakness of the department was insufficient resources to support staff research training (med=4, 3-6). Respondents considered themselves most skilled in finding relevant literature (med=6, 5-8) and least skilled at securing research funding (med=1, 1-2). Greater than half of the respondents (n=50) reported not currently being involved with research. Five themes were identified from the focus groups: empowerment; building research infrastructure; fostering research skills; access for all; and positive research culture. CONCLUSIONS: Allied Health Professionals recognise the benefits of research at teams and departmental level, but marginally at an individual level. Local research capacity building strategies should aim to address the role, responsibilities and barriers to Allied Health Profession research development at an individual level. To ensure all staff can engage, research infrastructure and empowerment are essential. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07480-x. BioMed Central 2022-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8764821/ /pubmed/35039018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07480-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Cordrey, Terry
King, Elizabeth
Pilkington, Emma
Gore, Katie
Gustafson, Owen
Exploring research capacity and culture of allied health professionals: a mixed methods evaluation
title Exploring research capacity and culture of allied health professionals: a mixed methods evaluation
title_full Exploring research capacity and culture of allied health professionals: a mixed methods evaluation
title_fullStr Exploring research capacity and culture of allied health professionals: a mixed methods evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Exploring research capacity and culture of allied health professionals: a mixed methods evaluation
title_short Exploring research capacity and culture of allied health professionals: a mixed methods evaluation
title_sort exploring research capacity and culture of allied health professionals: a mixed methods evaluation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8764821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35039018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07480-x
work_keys_str_mv AT cordreyterry exploringresearchcapacityandcultureofalliedhealthprofessionalsamixedmethodsevaluation
AT kingelizabeth exploringresearchcapacityandcultureofalliedhealthprofessionalsamixedmethodsevaluation
AT pilkingtonemma exploringresearchcapacityandcultureofalliedhealthprofessionalsamixedmethodsevaluation
AT gorekatie exploringresearchcapacityandcultureofalliedhealthprofessionalsamixedmethodsevaluation
AT gustafsonowen exploringresearchcapacityandcultureofalliedhealthprofessionalsamixedmethodsevaluation