Cargando…

Analysis of urgent follow up visits and complications after intravitreal injections: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Intravitreal injections (IVIs), a common treatment in ophthalmology, result in acute complications and urgent follow-up visits causing significant burden to both patient and physician. We evaluated the incidence of acute complications following IVIs which occurred within seven days of in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Alexander, Wilneff, Matthew A., Yazji, Andrew, Petrinec, Emily, Carbone, Michael, Miller, Chase, McCrossin, Christina, Donkor, Richard, Miller, David G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8764861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35042547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-021-00358-w
_version_ 1784634249577496576
author Miller, Alexander
Wilneff, Matthew A.
Yazji, Andrew
Petrinec, Emily
Carbone, Michael
Miller, Chase
McCrossin, Christina
Donkor, Richard
Miller, David G.
author_facet Miller, Alexander
Wilneff, Matthew A.
Yazji, Andrew
Petrinec, Emily
Carbone, Michael
Miller, Chase
McCrossin, Christina
Donkor, Richard
Miller, David G.
author_sort Miller, Alexander
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intravitreal injections (IVIs), a common treatment in ophthalmology, result in acute complications and urgent follow-up visits causing significant burden to both patient and physician. We evaluated the incidence of acute complications following IVIs which occurred within seven days of injection. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study conducted at a private retinal practice, in Cleveland, Ohio. Using the practice management software database, we examined 73,286 injections of patients with unscheduled or urgent visits within 7 days of an injection from August 1st,2018 to August 1st,2020. Data collected included: age, gender, eye, medication injected, diagnosis, reason for urgent follow-up, time between injection and urgent follow-up, and type of anesthesia administered. Data was analyzed using SPSS v.28 (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL). RESULTS: Study included 73,286 injections, with 441 injections (n = 441) resulting in urgent follow-up visits (0.60%). Mean patient age was 72.1 (± 30.4) years, with 187 male (42.4%) and 254 female (57.6%) patients. IVI medications included: aflibercept (60.3%), ranibizumab (22.4%), bevacizumab (13.4%), dexamethasone intravitreal implant (2%), triamcinolone acetonide (1.6%) brolucizumab (1.59%), fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant 0.19 mg (0.2%), and fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant 0.18 mg (0.03%) (Table 1). Medications associated with urgent visits included: aflibercept (42.9%), bevacizumab (37.4%), ranibizumab (7.9%), dexamethasone intravitreal implant (6.8%), brolucizumab (2.7%), and triamcinolone acetonide (2.3%) (Table 2). Days between injection and urgent follow-up was on average 3.96 ± 2.14 days. Urgent follow-ups included blurred vision in 164 patients (37.2% of urgent visits), flashes, floaters or posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) in 55 (12.5%), pain in 42 (9.5%), 43 (9.8%) corneal abrasions, 33 (7.5%) subconjunctival hemorrhages, corneal dryness or foreign body sensation in 30 (6.6%), endophthalmitis in 20 (4.5%), 18 (4.1%)vitreous hemorrhages, iritis or uveitis in 11 (2.5%), miscellaneous complications in 9 (2.0%), 7 (1.6%) elevated intraocular pressures, choroidal neovascular membrane in 4 (0.9%), 4 (0.9%) retinal detachments or tears, and 2 (0.45%) traumatic cataracts (Table 3). CONCLUSION: IVIs resulted in 0.60% urgent/unscheduled follow-up visits within 7 days of injection. Most common causes were blurred vision and symptoms of PVD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8764861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87648612022-01-19 Analysis of urgent follow up visits and complications after intravitreal injections: a retrospective cohort study Miller, Alexander Wilneff, Matthew A. Yazji, Andrew Petrinec, Emily Carbone, Michael Miller, Chase McCrossin, Christina Donkor, Richard Miller, David G. Int J Retina Vitreous Original Article BACKGROUND: Intravitreal injections (IVIs), a common treatment in ophthalmology, result in acute complications and urgent follow-up visits causing significant burden to both patient and physician. We evaluated the incidence of acute complications following IVIs which occurred within seven days of injection. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study conducted at a private retinal practice, in Cleveland, Ohio. Using the practice management software database, we examined 73,286 injections of patients with unscheduled or urgent visits within 7 days of an injection from August 1st,2018 to August 1st,2020. Data collected included: age, gender, eye, medication injected, diagnosis, reason for urgent follow-up, time between injection and urgent follow-up, and type of anesthesia administered. Data was analyzed using SPSS v.28 (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL). RESULTS: Study included 73,286 injections, with 441 injections (n = 441) resulting in urgent follow-up visits (0.60%). Mean patient age was 72.1 (± 30.4) years, with 187 male (42.4%) and 254 female (57.6%) patients. IVI medications included: aflibercept (60.3%), ranibizumab (22.4%), bevacizumab (13.4%), dexamethasone intravitreal implant (2%), triamcinolone acetonide (1.6%) brolucizumab (1.59%), fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant 0.19 mg (0.2%), and fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant 0.18 mg (0.03%) (Table 1). Medications associated with urgent visits included: aflibercept (42.9%), bevacizumab (37.4%), ranibizumab (7.9%), dexamethasone intravitreal implant (6.8%), brolucizumab (2.7%), and triamcinolone acetonide (2.3%) (Table 2). Days between injection and urgent follow-up was on average 3.96 ± 2.14 days. Urgent follow-ups included blurred vision in 164 patients (37.2% of urgent visits), flashes, floaters or posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) in 55 (12.5%), pain in 42 (9.5%), 43 (9.8%) corneal abrasions, 33 (7.5%) subconjunctival hemorrhages, corneal dryness or foreign body sensation in 30 (6.6%), endophthalmitis in 20 (4.5%), 18 (4.1%)vitreous hemorrhages, iritis or uveitis in 11 (2.5%), miscellaneous complications in 9 (2.0%), 7 (1.6%) elevated intraocular pressures, choroidal neovascular membrane in 4 (0.9%), 4 (0.9%) retinal detachments or tears, and 2 (0.45%) traumatic cataracts (Table 3). CONCLUSION: IVIs resulted in 0.60% urgent/unscheduled follow-up visits within 7 days of injection. Most common causes were blurred vision and symptoms of PVD. BioMed Central 2022-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8764861/ /pubmed/35042547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-021-00358-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Original Article
Miller, Alexander
Wilneff, Matthew A.
Yazji, Andrew
Petrinec, Emily
Carbone, Michael
Miller, Chase
McCrossin, Christina
Donkor, Richard
Miller, David G.
Analysis of urgent follow up visits and complications after intravitreal injections: a retrospective cohort study
title Analysis of urgent follow up visits and complications after intravitreal injections: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Analysis of urgent follow up visits and complications after intravitreal injections: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Analysis of urgent follow up visits and complications after intravitreal injections: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of urgent follow up visits and complications after intravitreal injections: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Analysis of urgent follow up visits and complications after intravitreal injections: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort analysis of urgent follow up visits and complications after intravitreal injections: a retrospective cohort study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8764861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35042547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-021-00358-w
work_keys_str_mv AT milleralexander analysisofurgentfollowupvisitsandcomplicationsafterintravitrealinjectionsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wilneffmatthewa analysisofurgentfollowupvisitsandcomplicationsafterintravitrealinjectionsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yazjiandrew analysisofurgentfollowupvisitsandcomplicationsafterintravitrealinjectionsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT petrinecemily analysisofurgentfollowupvisitsandcomplicationsafterintravitrealinjectionsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT carbonemichael analysisofurgentfollowupvisitsandcomplicationsafterintravitrealinjectionsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT millerchase analysisofurgentfollowupvisitsandcomplicationsafterintravitrealinjectionsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mccrossinchristina analysisofurgentfollowupvisitsandcomplicationsafterintravitrealinjectionsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT donkorrichard analysisofurgentfollowupvisitsandcomplicationsafterintravitrealinjectionsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT millerdavidg analysisofurgentfollowupvisitsandcomplicationsafterintravitrealinjectionsaretrospectivecohortstudy