Cargando…
Governance systems for skilled health worker migration, their public value and competing priorities: an interpretive scoping review
BACKGROUND: Governments worldwide participate in skilled health worker (SHW) migration agreements to protect access to health services in their countries. Previous studies have described the value offered by these agreements in separate source and destination country perspectives. OBJECTIVE: We soug...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8765257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35037590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2021.2013600 |
_version_ | 1784634305378516992 |
---|---|
author | Yakubu, Kenneth Durbach, Andrea van Waes, Alexandra Mabunda, Sikhumbuzo A. Peiris, David Shanthosh, Janani Joshi, Rohina |
author_facet | Yakubu, Kenneth Durbach, Andrea van Waes, Alexandra Mabunda, Sikhumbuzo A. Peiris, David Shanthosh, Janani Joshi, Rohina |
author_sort | Yakubu, Kenneth |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Governments worldwide participate in skilled health worker (SHW) migration agreements to protect access to health services in their countries. Previous studies have described the value offered by these agreements in separate source and destination country perspectives. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify and summarise existing literature on shared value creation for both source and destination countries. METHOD: We conducted a systematic scoping review of health databases and grey literature. Using Mark Moore and Colin Talbot frameworks, we summarised the public value propositions in migration agreements and how state actors addressed competing priorities. RESULTS: Most articles (34/63, 53.9%) reported transnational SHW mobility as the public value proposition for source and destination countries. Fewer articles, 14 (22.2%) and 9 (14.3%) articles, respectively, referred to achieving health workforce sustainability and building capacity for SHW migration governance as shared public values. The most identified competing public value (CPV) was an overriding focus on addressing SHW shortages in destination countries (20/63, 37.7%). Efforts to address this CPV include mitigation of the adverse effects of migration (43/63, 68.3%) and promoting health workforce development in source countries (15, 23.8%). At the same time, state actors retained regulatory discretion for protecting their country’s public health interest (34, 54%). Most articles reported the lack of funds (15/63, 23.8%) and implementation mechanisms (19/63, 30.2%) as constraints on the authorising environment and the operational capacity of SHW migration governance systems. CONCLUSION: Regarding SHW migration governance, the literature reports shared public value propositions for source and destination countries. It also shows how the value-creating process in the management of SHW migration favours destination countries. Future studies will need to explore shared value creation models that ensure equity in the governance of SHW migration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8765257 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87652572022-01-19 Governance systems for skilled health worker migration, their public value and competing priorities: an interpretive scoping review Yakubu, Kenneth Durbach, Andrea van Waes, Alexandra Mabunda, Sikhumbuzo A. Peiris, David Shanthosh, Janani Joshi, Rohina Glob Health Action Review Article BACKGROUND: Governments worldwide participate in skilled health worker (SHW) migration agreements to protect access to health services in their countries. Previous studies have described the value offered by these agreements in separate source and destination country perspectives. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify and summarise existing literature on shared value creation for both source and destination countries. METHOD: We conducted a systematic scoping review of health databases and grey literature. Using Mark Moore and Colin Talbot frameworks, we summarised the public value propositions in migration agreements and how state actors addressed competing priorities. RESULTS: Most articles (34/63, 53.9%) reported transnational SHW mobility as the public value proposition for source and destination countries. Fewer articles, 14 (22.2%) and 9 (14.3%) articles, respectively, referred to achieving health workforce sustainability and building capacity for SHW migration governance as shared public values. The most identified competing public value (CPV) was an overriding focus on addressing SHW shortages in destination countries (20/63, 37.7%). Efforts to address this CPV include mitigation of the adverse effects of migration (43/63, 68.3%) and promoting health workforce development in source countries (15, 23.8%). At the same time, state actors retained regulatory discretion for protecting their country’s public health interest (34, 54%). Most articles reported the lack of funds (15/63, 23.8%) and implementation mechanisms (19/63, 30.2%) as constraints on the authorising environment and the operational capacity of SHW migration governance systems. CONCLUSION: Regarding SHW migration governance, the literature reports shared public value propositions for source and destination countries. It also shows how the value-creating process in the management of SHW migration favours destination countries. Future studies will need to explore shared value creation models that ensure equity in the governance of SHW migration. Taylor & Francis 2022-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8765257/ /pubmed/35037590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2021.2013600 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Yakubu, Kenneth Durbach, Andrea van Waes, Alexandra Mabunda, Sikhumbuzo A. Peiris, David Shanthosh, Janani Joshi, Rohina Governance systems for skilled health worker migration, their public value and competing priorities: an interpretive scoping review |
title | Governance systems for skilled health worker migration, their public value and competing priorities: an interpretive scoping review |
title_full | Governance systems for skilled health worker migration, their public value and competing priorities: an interpretive scoping review |
title_fullStr | Governance systems for skilled health worker migration, their public value and competing priorities: an interpretive scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Governance systems for skilled health worker migration, their public value and competing priorities: an interpretive scoping review |
title_short | Governance systems for skilled health worker migration, their public value and competing priorities: an interpretive scoping review |
title_sort | governance systems for skilled health worker migration, their public value and competing priorities: an interpretive scoping review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8765257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35037590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2021.2013600 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yakubukenneth governancesystemsforskilledhealthworkermigrationtheirpublicvalueandcompetingprioritiesaninterpretivescopingreview AT durbachandrea governancesystemsforskilledhealthworkermigrationtheirpublicvalueandcompetingprioritiesaninterpretivescopingreview AT vanwaesalexandra governancesystemsforskilledhealthworkermigrationtheirpublicvalueandcompetingprioritiesaninterpretivescopingreview AT mabundasikhumbuzoa governancesystemsforskilledhealthworkermigrationtheirpublicvalueandcompetingprioritiesaninterpretivescopingreview AT peirisdavid governancesystemsforskilledhealthworkermigrationtheirpublicvalueandcompetingprioritiesaninterpretivescopingreview AT shanthoshjanani governancesystemsforskilledhealthworkermigrationtheirpublicvalueandcompetingprioritiesaninterpretivescopingreview AT joshirohina governancesystemsforskilledhealthworkermigrationtheirpublicvalueandcompetingprioritiesaninterpretivescopingreview |