Cargando…

Clinical Documentation during Scribed and Nonscribed Ophthalmology Office Visits

PURPOSE: To observe the impact of using scribes on documentation efficiency in ophthalmology clinics. DESIGN: Single-center retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 29 997 outpatient visits conducted by 7 attending ophthalmologists between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019, were inc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dusek, Haley L., Goldstein, Isaac H., Rule, Adam, Chiang, Michael F., Hribar, Michelle R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8765735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35059685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2021.100088
_version_ 1784634378308026368
author Dusek, Haley L.
Goldstein, Isaac H.
Rule, Adam
Chiang, Michael F.
Hribar, Michelle R.
author_facet Dusek, Haley L.
Goldstein, Isaac H.
Rule, Adam
Chiang, Michael F.
Hribar, Michelle R.
author_sort Dusek, Haley L.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To observe the impact of using scribes on documentation efficiency in ophthalmology clinics. DESIGN: Single-center retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 29 997 outpatient visits conducted by 7 attending ophthalmologists between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019, were included in the study: 18 483 with a scribe present during the encounter and 11 514 without a scribe present. METHODS: Use of a scribe. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total physician documentation time, physician documentation time during and after the visit, visit length, time to chart closure, note length, and percentage of note text edited by physician. RESULTS: Total physician documentation time was significantly less when working with a scribe (mean ± standard deviation, 4.7 ± 2.9 minutes/note vs. 7.6 ± 3.8 minutes/note; P < 0.001), as was documentation time during the visit (2.8 ± 2.2 minutes/note vs. 5.9 ± 3.1 minutes/note; P < 0.001). Physicians also edited scribed notes less, deleting 1.9 ± 4.4% of scribes’ draft note text and adding 14.8 ± 11.4% of the final note text, compared with deleting 6.0 ± 9.1% (P < 0.001) of draft note text and adding 21.2 ± 15.3% (P < 0.001) of final note text when not working with a scribe. However, physician after-visit documentation time was significantly higher with a scribe for 3 of 7 physicians (P < 0.001). Scribe use was also associated with an office visit length increase of 2.9 minutes (P < 0.001) per patient and time to chart closure of 3.0 hours (P < 0.001), according to mixed-effects linear models. CONCLUSIONS: Scribe use was associated with increased documentation efficiency through lower total documentation time and less note editing by physicians. However, the use of a scribe was also associated with longer office visit lengths and time to chart closure. The variability in the impact of scribe use on different measures of documentation efficiency leaves unanswered questions about best practices for the implementation of scribes and warrants further study of effective scribe use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8765735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87657352022-10-14 Clinical Documentation during Scribed and Nonscribed Ophthalmology Office Visits Dusek, Haley L. Goldstein, Isaac H. Rule, Adam Chiang, Michael F. Hribar, Michelle R. Ophthalmol Sci Original Article PURPOSE: To observe the impact of using scribes on documentation efficiency in ophthalmology clinics. DESIGN: Single-center retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 29 997 outpatient visits conducted by 7 attending ophthalmologists between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019, were included in the study: 18 483 with a scribe present during the encounter and 11 514 without a scribe present. METHODS: Use of a scribe. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total physician documentation time, physician documentation time during and after the visit, visit length, time to chart closure, note length, and percentage of note text edited by physician. RESULTS: Total physician documentation time was significantly less when working with a scribe (mean ± standard deviation, 4.7 ± 2.9 minutes/note vs. 7.6 ± 3.8 minutes/note; P < 0.001), as was documentation time during the visit (2.8 ± 2.2 minutes/note vs. 5.9 ± 3.1 minutes/note; P < 0.001). Physicians also edited scribed notes less, deleting 1.9 ± 4.4% of scribes’ draft note text and adding 14.8 ± 11.4% of the final note text, compared with deleting 6.0 ± 9.1% (P < 0.001) of draft note text and adding 21.2 ± 15.3% (P < 0.001) of final note text when not working with a scribe. However, physician after-visit documentation time was significantly higher with a scribe for 3 of 7 physicians (P < 0.001). Scribe use was also associated with an office visit length increase of 2.9 minutes (P < 0.001) per patient and time to chart closure of 3.0 hours (P < 0.001), according to mixed-effects linear models. CONCLUSIONS: Scribe use was associated with increased documentation efficiency through lower total documentation time and less note editing by physicians. However, the use of a scribe was also associated with longer office visit lengths and time to chart closure. The variability in the impact of scribe use on different measures of documentation efficiency leaves unanswered questions about best practices for the implementation of scribes and warrants further study of effective scribe use. Elsevier 2021-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8765735/ /pubmed/35059685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2021.100088 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Ophthalmology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Dusek, Haley L.
Goldstein, Isaac H.
Rule, Adam
Chiang, Michael F.
Hribar, Michelle R.
Clinical Documentation during Scribed and Nonscribed Ophthalmology Office Visits
title Clinical Documentation during Scribed and Nonscribed Ophthalmology Office Visits
title_full Clinical Documentation during Scribed and Nonscribed Ophthalmology Office Visits
title_fullStr Clinical Documentation during Scribed and Nonscribed Ophthalmology Office Visits
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Documentation during Scribed and Nonscribed Ophthalmology Office Visits
title_short Clinical Documentation during Scribed and Nonscribed Ophthalmology Office Visits
title_sort clinical documentation during scribed and nonscribed ophthalmology office visits
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8765735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35059685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2021.100088
work_keys_str_mv AT dusekhaleyl clinicaldocumentationduringscribedandnonscribedophthalmologyofficevisits
AT goldsteinisaach clinicaldocumentationduringscribedandnonscribedophthalmologyofficevisits
AT ruleadam clinicaldocumentationduringscribedandnonscribedophthalmologyofficevisits
AT chiangmichaelf clinicaldocumentationduringscribedandnonscribedophthalmologyofficevisits
AT hribarmicheller clinicaldocumentationduringscribedandnonscribedophthalmologyofficevisits