Cargando…

Evaluation of the relationship between joint torque and angular velocity using a modified leg extension machine

OBJECTIVE: When performing knee extension using a leg extension machine, the lower limb is pushed back in the direction in which knee flexion occurs in response to the freefall of the weight after maximal knee extension. Therefore, eccentric contractions of the knee extensors are needed, which may l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanada, Yoshikiyo, Sakurai, Hiroaki, Sugiura, Yoshito, Arai, Tomoaki, Koyama, Soichiro, Tanabe, Shigeo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Fujita Medical Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8766240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35111508
http://dx.doi.org/10.20407/fmj.2018-018
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: When performing knee extension using a leg extension machine, the lower limb is pushed back in the direction in which knee flexion occurs in response to the freefall of the weight after maximal knee extension. Therefore, eccentric contractions of the knee extensors are needed, which may lead to cumulative fatigue of the extensors, consequently reducing the reliability of the knee extensor torque values. This study aimed to determine the relationship between joint torque and angular velocity in one repetition maximum (1RM) measurement for knee extension using a leg extension machine with and without a modification to prevent counter-rotation. METHODS: Twenty-one healthy adult men (mean age: 27.7±5.4 years) participated in the study. A leg extension machine was modified to prevent counter-rotation due to the freefall of weights. The subjects performed knee extension using the modified leg extension machine, and the joint torque and angular velocity were calculated using two-dimensional analysis. A regression equation between these two factors was created to estimate the maximal isometric torque. RESULTS: Both the joint torque and angular velocity tended to increase after modification of the leg extension machine, although these differences were not significant. Similarly, there were no significant post-modification changes in the estimated maximal isometric torque. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that the joint torque, angular velocity, and estimated maximal isometric torque remained unchanged after machine modification; thus, the modified leg extension machine may make it possible to produce the knee extensor torque more safely in 1RM measurement.