Cargando…
Treatment interruption is a risk factor for sickness presenteeism: A large‐scale cross‐sectional study during the COVID‐19 pandemic
OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relationship between interruption to routine medical care during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and sickness presenteeism among workers in Japan. METHODS: A cross‐sectional study using data obtained from an internet monitor questionnaire was conducted. Inte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8766292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35043519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12313 |
_version_ | 1784634497652752384 |
---|---|
author | Okawara, Makoto Ishimaru, Tomohiro Tateishi, Seiichiro Hino, Ayako Tsuji, Mayumi Ogami, Akira Nagata, Tomohisa Matsuda, Shinya Fujino, Yoshihisa |
author_facet | Okawara, Makoto Ishimaru, Tomohiro Tateishi, Seiichiro Hino, Ayako Tsuji, Mayumi Ogami, Akira Nagata, Tomohisa Matsuda, Shinya Fujino, Yoshihisa |
author_sort | Okawara, Makoto |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relationship between interruption to routine medical care during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and sickness presenteeism among workers in Japan. METHODS: A cross‐sectional study using data obtained from an internet monitor questionnaire was conducted. Interruption to medical care was defined based on the response “I have not been able to go to the hospital or receive treatment as scheduled.” The fraction of sickness presenteeism days in the past 30 days was employed as the primary outcome. A fractional logit model was used for analysis to treat bounded data. RESULTS: Of the 27 036 participants, 17 526 (65%) were workers who did not require routine medical care, 8451 (31%) were using medical care as scheduled, and 1059 (4%) experienced interrupted medical care. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of sickness presenteeism was significantly higher among workers who experienced interrupted medical care (3.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.04–3.89) than those who did not require routine medical care. In terms of symptoms, the highest aOR was observed among workers with mental health symptoms (aOR: 5.59, 95% CI: 5.04–6.20). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests the importance of continuing necessary treatment during a pandemic to prevent presenteeism. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8766292 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87662922022-01-24 Treatment interruption is a risk factor for sickness presenteeism: A large‐scale cross‐sectional study during the COVID‐19 pandemic Okawara, Makoto Ishimaru, Tomohiro Tateishi, Seiichiro Hino, Ayako Tsuji, Mayumi Ogami, Akira Nagata, Tomohisa Matsuda, Shinya Fujino, Yoshihisa J Occup Health Original Articles OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relationship between interruption to routine medical care during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and sickness presenteeism among workers in Japan. METHODS: A cross‐sectional study using data obtained from an internet monitor questionnaire was conducted. Interruption to medical care was defined based on the response “I have not been able to go to the hospital or receive treatment as scheduled.” The fraction of sickness presenteeism days in the past 30 days was employed as the primary outcome. A fractional logit model was used for analysis to treat bounded data. RESULTS: Of the 27 036 participants, 17 526 (65%) were workers who did not require routine medical care, 8451 (31%) were using medical care as scheduled, and 1059 (4%) experienced interrupted medical care. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of sickness presenteeism was significantly higher among workers who experienced interrupted medical care (3.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.04–3.89) than those who did not require routine medical care. In terms of symptoms, the highest aOR was observed among workers with mental health symptoms (aOR: 5.59, 95% CI: 5.04–6.20). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests the importance of continuing necessary treatment during a pandemic to prevent presenteeism. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8766292/ /pubmed/35043519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12313 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Occupational Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japan Society for Occupational Health. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Okawara, Makoto Ishimaru, Tomohiro Tateishi, Seiichiro Hino, Ayako Tsuji, Mayumi Ogami, Akira Nagata, Tomohisa Matsuda, Shinya Fujino, Yoshihisa Treatment interruption is a risk factor for sickness presenteeism: A large‐scale cross‐sectional study during the COVID‐19 pandemic |
title | Treatment interruption is a risk factor for sickness presenteeism: A large‐scale cross‐sectional study during the COVID‐19 pandemic |
title_full | Treatment interruption is a risk factor for sickness presenteeism: A large‐scale cross‐sectional study during the COVID‐19 pandemic |
title_fullStr | Treatment interruption is a risk factor for sickness presenteeism: A large‐scale cross‐sectional study during the COVID‐19 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment interruption is a risk factor for sickness presenteeism: A large‐scale cross‐sectional study during the COVID‐19 pandemic |
title_short | Treatment interruption is a risk factor for sickness presenteeism: A large‐scale cross‐sectional study during the COVID‐19 pandemic |
title_sort | treatment interruption is a risk factor for sickness presenteeism: a large‐scale cross‐sectional study during the covid‐19 pandemic |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8766292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35043519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12313 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT okawaramakoto treatmentinterruptionisariskfactorforsicknesspresenteeismalargescalecrosssectionalstudyduringthecovid19pandemic AT ishimarutomohiro treatmentinterruptionisariskfactorforsicknesspresenteeismalargescalecrosssectionalstudyduringthecovid19pandemic AT tateishiseiichiro treatmentinterruptionisariskfactorforsicknesspresenteeismalargescalecrosssectionalstudyduringthecovid19pandemic AT hinoayako treatmentinterruptionisariskfactorforsicknesspresenteeismalargescalecrosssectionalstudyduringthecovid19pandemic AT tsujimayumi treatmentinterruptionisariskfactorforsicknesspresenteeismalargescalecrosssectionalstudyduringthecovid19pandemic AT ogamiakira treatmentinterruptionisariskfactorforsicknesspresenteeismalargescalecrosssectionalstudyduringthecovid19pandemic AT nagatatomohisa treatmentinterruptionisariskfactorforsicknesspresenteeismalargescalecrosssectionalstudyduringthecovid19pandemic AT matsudashinya treatmentinterruptionisariskfactorforsicknesspresenteeismalargescalecrosssectionalstudyduringthecovid19pandemic AT fujinoyoshihisa treatmentinterruptionisariskfactorforsicknesspresenteeismalargescalecrosssectionalstudyduringthecovid19pandemic AT treatmentinterruptionisariskfactorforsicknesspresenteeismalargescalecrosssectionalstudyduringthecovid19pandemic |