Cargando…

Treatment interruption is a risk factor for sickness presenteeism: A large‐scale cross‐sectional study during the COVID‐19 pandemic

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relationship between interruption to routine medical care during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and sickness presenteeism among workers in Japan. METHODS: A cross‐sectional study using data obtained from an internet monitor questionnaire was conducted. Inte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okawara, Makoto, Ishimaru, Tomohiro, Tateishi, Seiichiro, Hino, Ayako, Tsuji, Mayumi, Ogami, Akira, Nagata, Tomohisa, Matsuda, Shinya, Fujino, Yoshihisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8766292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35043519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12313
_version_ 1784634497652752384
author Okawara, Makoto
Ishimaru, Tomohiro
Tateishi, Seiichiro
Hino, Ayako
Tsuji, Mayumi
Ogami, Akira
Nagata, Tomohisa
Matsuda, Shinya
Fujino, Yoshihisa
author_facet Okawara, Makoto
Ishimaru, Tomohiro
Tateishi, Seiichiro
Hino, Ayako
Tsuji, Mayumi
Ogami, Akira
Nagata, Tomohisa
Matsuda, Shinya
Fujino, Yoshihisa
author_sort Okawara, Makoto
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relationship between interruption to routine medical care during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and sickness presenteeism among workers in Japan. METHODS: A cross‐sectional study using data obtained from an internet monitor questionnaire was conducted. Interruption to medical care was defined based on the response “I have not been able to go to the hospital or receive treatment as scheduled.” The fraction of sickness presenteeism days in the past 30 days was employed as the primary outcome. A fractional logit model was used for analysis to treat bounded data. RESULTS: Of the 27 036 participants, 17 526 (65%) were workers who did not require routine medical care, 8451 (31%) were using medical care as scheduled, and 1059 (4%) experienced interrupted medical care. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of sickness presenteeism was significantly higher among workers who experienced interrupted medical care (3.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.04–3.89) than those who did not require routine medical care. In terms of symptoms, the highest aOR was observed among workers with mental health symptoms (aOR: 5.59, 95% CI: 5.04–6.20). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests the importance of continuing necessary treatment during a pandemic to prevent presenteeism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8766292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87662922022-01-24 Treatment interruption is a risk factor for sickness presenteeism: A large‐scale cross‐sectional study during the COVID‐19 pandemic Okawara, Makoto Ishimaru, Tomohiro Tateishi, Seiichiro Hino, Ayako Tsuji, Mayumi Ogami, Akira Nagata, Tomohisa Matsuda, Shinya Fujino, Yoshihisa J Occup Health Original Articles OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relationship between interruption to routine medical care during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and sickness presenteeism among workers in Japan. METHODS: A cross‐sectional study using data obtained from an internet monitor questionnaire was conducted. Interruption to medical care was defined based on the response “I have not been able to go to the hospital or receive treatment as scheduled.” The fraction of sickness presenteeism days in the past 30 days was employed as the primary outcome. A fractional logit model was used for analysis to treat bounded data. RESULTS: Of the 27 036 participants, 17 526 (65%) were workers who did not require routine medical care, 8451 (31%) were using medical care as scheduled, and 1059 (4%) experienced interrupted medical care. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of sickness presenteeism was significantly higher among workers who experienced interrupted medical care (3.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.04–3.89) than those who did not require routine medical care. In terms of symptoms, the highest aOR was observed among workers with mental health symptoms (aOR: 5.59, 95% CI: 5.04–6.20). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests the importance of continuing necessary treatment during a pandemic to prevent presenteeism. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8766292/ /pubmed/35043519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12313 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Occupational Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japan Society for Occupational Health. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Okawara, Makoto
Ishimaru, Tomohiro
Tateishi, Seiichiro
Hino, Ayako
Tsuji, Mayumi
Ogami, Akira
Nagata, Tomohisa
Matsuda, Shinya
Fujino, Yoshihisa
Treatment interruption is a risk factor for sickness presenteeism: A large‐scale cross‐sectional study during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title Treatment interruption is a risk factor for sickness presenteeism: A large‐scale cross‐sectional study during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title_full Treatment interruption is a risk factor for sickness presenteeism: A large‐scale cross‐sectional study during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title_fullStr Treatment interruption is a risk factor for sickness presenteeism: A large‐scale cross‐sectional study during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Treatment interruption is a risk factor for sickness presenteeism: A large‐scale cross‐sectional study during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title_short Treatment interruption is a risk factor for sickness presenteeism: A large‐scale cross‐sectional study during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title_sort treatment interruption is a risk factor for sickness presenteeism: a large‐scale cross‐sectional study during the covid‐19 pandemic
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8766292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35043519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12313
work_keys_str_mv AT okawaramakoto treatmentinterruptionisariskfactorforsicknesspresenteeismalargescalecrosssectionalstudyduringthecovid19pandemic
AT ishimarutomohiro treatmentinterruptionisariskfactorforsicknesspresenteeismalargescalecrosssectionalstudyduringthecovid19pandemic
AT tateishiseiichiro treatmentinterruptionisariskfactorforsicknesspresenteeismalargescalecrosssectionalstudyduringthecovid19pandemic
AT hinoayako treatmentinterruptionisariskfactorforsicknesspresenteeismalargescalecrosssectionalstudyduringthecovid19pandemic
AT tsujimayumi treatmentinterruptionisariskfactorforsicknesspresenteeismalargescalecrosssectionalstudyduringthecovid19pandemic
AT ogamiakira treatmentinterruptionisariskfactorforsicknesspresenteeismalargescalecrosssectionalstudyduringthecovid19pandemic
AT nagatatomohisa treatmentinterruptionisariskfactorforsicknesspresenteeismalargescalecrosssectionalstudyduringthecovid19pandemic
AT matsudashinya treatmentinterruptionisariskfactorforsicknesspresenteeismalargescalecrosssectionalstudyduringthecovid19pandemic
AT fujinoyoshihisa treatmentinterruptionisariskfactorforsicknesspresenteeismalargescalecrosssectionalstudyduringthecovid19pandemic
AT treatmentinterruptionisariskfactorforsicknesspresenteeismalargescalecrosssectionalstudyduringthecovid19pandemic