Cargando…

A Novel Inflammatory-Related Gene Signature Based Model for Risk Stratification and Prognosis Prediction in Lung Adenocarcinoma

Inflammation is an important hallmark of cancer and plays a role in both neogenesis and tumor development. Despite this, inflammatory-related genes (IRGs) remain to be poorly studied in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). We aim to explore the prognostic value of IRGs for LUAD and construct an IRG-based pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhai, Wen-Yu, Duan, Fang-Fang, Chen, Si, Wang, Jun-Ye, Lin, Yao-Bin, Wang, Yi-Zhi, Rao, Bing-Yu, Zhao, Ze-Rui, Long, Hao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8766344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35069695
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.798131
Descripción
Sumario:Inflammation is an important hallmark of cancer and plays a role in both neogenesis and tumor development. Despite this, inflammatory-related genes (IRGs) remain to be poorly studied in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). We aim to explore the prognostic value of IRGs for LUAD and construct an IRG-based prognosis signature. The transcriptomic profiles and clinicopathological information of patients with LUAD were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis and multivariate Cox regression were applied in the TCGA set to generate an IRG risk signature. LUAD cases with from the GSE31210 and GSE30219 datasets were used to validate the predictive ability of the signature. Analysis of the TCGA cohort revealed a five-IRG risk signature consisting of EREG, GPC3, IL7R, LAMP3, and NMUR1. This signature was used to divide patients into two risk groups with different survival rates. Multivariate Cox regression analysis verified that the risk score from the five-IRG signature negatively correlated with patient outcome. A nomogram was developed using the IRG risk signature and stage, with C-index values of 0.687 (95% CI: 0.644–0.730) in the TCGA training cohort, 0.678 (95% CI: 0.586–0.771) in GSE30219 cohort, and 0.656 (95% CI: 0.571–0.740) in GSE30219 cohort. Calibration curves were consistent between the actual and the predicted overall survival. The immune infiltration analysis in the TCGA training cohort and two GEO validation cohorts showed a distinctly differentiated immune cell infiltration landscape between the two risk groups. The IRG risk signature for LUAD can be used to predict patient prognosis and guide individual treatment. This risk signature is also a potential biomarker of immunotherapy.